Splunk AppDynamics and Cisco UCS Manager are contenders in the enterprise IT management space. Splunk AppDynamics has an advantage in comprehensive analytics and monitoring features, while Cisco UCS Manager excels in easy integration and management capabilities.
Features: Splunk AppDynamics provides capabilities such as JVM performance monitoring, transaction snapshots, and integrated analytics, allowing precise tracking of application performance and end-user experience. Its auto-baselining for performance metrics is a notable feature. Cisco UCS Manager is known for its robust management of network and storage components, offering seamless control over hardware configurations and a user-friendly dashboard.
Room for Improvement: Splunk AppDynamics users find dashboard customization complex and face challenges with asynchronous method tracking and limited integration support for newer technologies. Cisco UCS Manager could benefit from a more streamlined interface and enhanced centralized management capabilities. High licensing costs are also a concern for its users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk AppDynamics supports diverse deployment environments including public, private, and hybrid clouds, which enhances its versatility. While its customer service is generally well-regarded, users sometimes experience delays in technical support. Cisco UCS Manager is primarily on-premises, with reliable support that might be daunting for smaller organizations due to complexity and expense.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk AppDynamics is considered costly due to its expansive licensing model, but it offers value through quick ROI from troubleshooting efficiency and performance improvements. Cisco UCS Manager, though more expensive compared to alternatives, is justified by its comprehensive features leading to operational stability and reduced management efforts. The high upfront costs can impact initial investment decisions.
There's no need for an extra management device or virtual machine, as everything runs within the fabric interconnect.
Cisco UCS Manager provides cost savings by reducing the time support staff spend on long deployments.
Overall, as a production gatekeeper, we achieve at least 50% efficiency immediately, with potential savings ranging from 60 to 70% as well, reinforcing why it is a popular tool in the banking industry.
According to errors, exceptions, and code-level details related to their application performance on a daily basis, the application development team tries to help with Splunk AppDynamics to reduce errors and exceptions, which helps the end users get application availability and feel more confident.
To understand the magnitude of it, when the company asked to replace Splunk AppDynamics with another tool, I indicated that for the proposed tool, we would need five people to do the analysis that Splunk AppDynamics enables me to do.
For a severity one case, a call ensures immediate assistance and resolution of the matter.
With Intersight, service requests are automatically generated, enhancing the user experience and providing timely resolutions.
Regarding Cisco tech, they are pretty good.
AppDynamics is much more helpful.
We got a contact, an account manager, to work directly with for technical support.
They help us resolve any issues raised by our team relating to operations, application instrumentation, or any other issues.
Adding new chassis and extra blades is streamlined.
I would rate the scalability at nine out of ten, probably.
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
I would rate the scalability of Splunk AppDynamics as a nine out of ten.
I assess how Splunk AppDynamics scales with the growing needs of my organization as good, since we are growing and adding more servers.
If there's a really complex problem, I would probably give it a ten since it gets escalated quickly.
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
There are no issues or bugs with the 20.4 version; it is very stable with no functionality or operational issues.
Splunk AppDynamics is superior to any alternative, including Dynatrace.
We would benefit from advancements in AI that offer firmware recommendations automatically, reducing the need for human intervention and vendor communication.
It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing.
While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the tabs would enhance user experience.
Splunk AppDynamics does not support the complete MELT framework, which includes metrics, events, logging, and tracing for the entire stack.
If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems.
A good integration with Splunk would be very interesting, as Splunk is a good product for logs, and that part is currently missing in Splunk AppDynamics.
Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offers like buying three servers and getting one free, along with UCSC and fabric included for free.
As long as they can afford it, there is a setup cost involved.
We completed a three-year deal for Splunk and for AppDynamics, which costs millions of dollars.
Overall, I consider Splunk AppDynamics an expensive product; it's very expensive.
Customers have to pay a premium price, however, they receive considerable value from the product.
It supports ease of deployment, allowing for quick mass deployments in the data center, saving time and resources by doing so from a remote location.
Whenever there's a failure of any component, it's very easy to swap because you just disassociate that profile, remove the faulty blade, connect the new blade, and associate that profile, maintaining the same MAC address and worldwide port name.
One of the valuable features is the user interface base, specifically the C user interface.
We have multiple tools, but end users prefer to use Splunk AppDynamics because their portal navigation is very simple and clear.
The real user monitoring and digital experience monitoring effectively track actual user experience with the applications, including page loading, interaction time for both desktop and mobile applications.
This is the best feature because, although you can't monitor a whole application at once, Splunk AppDynamics gives you the option that if there is any failure—simple failure regarding anything set up as per our use cases—you will get an alert.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk AppDynamics | 2.6% |
| Cisco UCS Manager | 1.3% |
| Other | 96.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 198 |
Splunk AppDynamics is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool providing end-to-end transaction tracking, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly interface. With AI-powered features, it enhances operational efficiency and resilience by offering insights into user interactions and infrastructure issues.
Splunk AppDynamics excels in monitoring applications and infrastructure performance, offering extensive support across environments like AWS and cloud. It aids in application performance monitoring, end-user experience, database analysis, and proactive incident detection. Supporting Java, .NET, and other technologies, it provides real-time insights into application health, resource utilization, and transaction tracking, ensuring reliable user experiences. Challenges remain in UI complexity, agent-based architecture, integration with diverse environments, and documentation clarity. Its licensing model is costly, and customer support may be slow. Performance concerns exist in historical data granularity and network visibility.
What features make Splunk AppDynamics stand out?Organizations in industries like finance and healthcare implement Splunk AppDynamics to monitor critical applications and infrastructure. Its capabilities in transaction tracking and AI-driven insights are crucial for maintaining system reliability, supporting technologies such as Java and .NET, and ensuring optimal resource utilization.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
