No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apollo GraphOS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apollo GraphOS
Ranking in API Management
20th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SEEBURGER Business Integrat...
Ranking in API Management
24th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apollo GraphOS is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apollo GraphOS0.8%
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite1.5%
Other97.7%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Unified schemas have streamlined team collaboration and have reduced API-related deployment issues
We had a positive experience with Apollo GraphOS, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved. One area is the learning curve around GraphQL Federation and schema governance. Teams that are new to federated architectures often need to understand best practices. More guided onboarding, built-in recommendations, and practical examples would make adoption easier. I also think the observability and troubleshooting experience could be enhanced, particularly when diagnosing issues that span multiple subgraphs. While the platform provides useful insights, tracing complex requests across a federated environment can still require additional investigations. Another improvement would be more granular administrative controls and reporting, especially for larger organizations where different teams manage different parts of the GraphQL platform. Although the CI/CD integration is one of the product's strengths, having more out-of-the-box integrations and similar configurations for popular DevOps tools would reduce the initial setup effort. These suggestions would make the platform easier to adopt, operate, and scale, particularly for organizations that are beginning their GraphQL Federation journey. One thing I would like to see in future releases is deeper operational visibility for large-scale federated environments. As the number of subgraphs and development teams grows, it becomes more important to quickly identify where performance bottlenecks or schema-related issues are originating without having to correlate information from multiple tools. More built-in governance capabilities would be valuable, such as stronger policy enforcement, approval workflows for schema changes, and richer reporting for platform administrators. Another area that could be improved is the onboarding experience. While the documentation is comprehensive, having more guided setup wizards, architectures, and real-world implementation examples would help new teams become productive more quickly. I would also like to see even broader integrations with common enterprise monitoring, security, and development platforms so organizations can manage Apollo GraphOS as part of their existing operational ecosystem rather than relying on additional customization. These points would make day-to-day administration easier and improve the experience for organizations running GraphQL at a larger scale.
SS
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration
The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of Apollo GraphOS OS for me are its security and authentication processes."
"Overall, Apollo GraphOS has been a valuable asset."
"Apollo GraphOS has significantly enhanced both the developer experience and product delivery timelines by offering a centralized approach to managing GraphQL schemas and services, helping reduce overhead and improve collaboration between frontend and backend teams."
"Apollo GraphOS positively impacts my organization by providing a complete platform for API orchestration, schema governance, observability, and federation."
"Apollo GraphOS has had a positive impact on our organization by making our API development process more structured, predictable, and collaborative."
"Apollo GraphOS has had a positive impact by improving the way we manage and evolve our GraphQL APIs."
"Apollo GraphOS has positively impacted our organization by reducing unwanted code and helping us combine multiple services."
"Fault tolerance, we rarely get hanged processes, therefore, it is reliable."
"We can code in Java, which is really good feature. There is very vast command available, which can be used in mapping."
"It has a lot of basic EDI already established for all the main users. Also, it lets me share setups that I had already set up for my first plant. I was able to use them for my second one which was very helpful. I didn't have to start from scratch for my second facility."
"SEEBURGER has helped us to enable digital business transformation. Every time we add a new customer, there is a digital footprint. This is no longer a manual process."
"It's a tremendously powerful solution and it gives us a lot of leverage to get things done quickly."
"SEEBURGER BIS helps us automate processes. When something is manual and we have to fix the data, then it is really complicated. However, when it's automated, we trust it and the process in the system, so we don't have to go back and fix it. For example, we had a problem with a partner sending 17 files every week, but a few times a year, they wouldn't send files during a certain window. We would escalate this with them. Then, when they caught up and sent the files again, they weren't authenticated. We had to fix this situation before it became a nightmare because our financials were impacted. Also, it was really messy. So, I worked with SEEBURGER to have something automated to pick up the files within a certain window and validate them as accurate. If the files come outside of this window, then we have to approve the loading of them."
"SEEBURGER BIS increased our efficiency by at least 30 percent."
"Sitting around with SEEBURGER at a seminar in December and discussing their project plan for the future, I think this product is the way to go."
 

Cons

"I rated it six out of ten because while it offers useful capabilities such as schema management, schema validation, and API observability, I feel there are several areas that need improvement."
"Apollo GraphOS could be improved with simpler pricing, more transparent usage and cost reporting, easier onboarding for new teams and learners, and more detailed documentation and troubleshooting guidance for complex GraphQL."
"There’s room for improvement in schema collaboration tools, especially in large teams where multiple developers are working on overlapping parts of the API."
"I think Apollo GraphOS can be improved since teams new to GraphQL federation may find concepts such as subgraphs, schema composition, contracts, and router configuration take time to understand, making the platform seem more complex than necessary for smaller teams."
"Apollo GraphOS OS is using a detailed project, and it can be time-consuming because it has a lot of data to manage. It sometimes takes longer than three seconds, which can affect loading times and lead to user dissatisfaction. I would like to see improved performance."
"The reason I held back from giving it a perfect score is that some enterprise scenarios still require additional effort."
"The cost models have room for improvement. There are different licensing models between Europe and the USA, which is something that I don't understand."
"We've lost a little bit of that personalization — someone who might know our business more."
"They made improvements to the email error alerts that go out, for the EDI technical. Those typically go straight out to the partners. Those messages are significantly clearer and easy to read. The same messages in the front end are not nearly as clear. It's supposed to be the same error, but the message that goes out for EDI is really easy for anybody to read and understand, but you have to be really solution-savvy to understand the message in the system itself."
"I would've liked, from day one, to learn how to do my own mapping. That would have saved a lot of time and effort if that had been brought forward earlier. It's there, I just didn't know about it. Also, some tidier, easier-to-use interfaces would help."
"Frontline support, or first-level support though, gets a rating of 4/10. Most of the time, they seem to be very bad at understanding the critical nature of an issue and they rarely manage to fulfill their own SLAs."
"There are a lot of service packs during the year. I know that part is the process for updating features, but sometimes it's difficult to update service packs every month."
"The solution's documentation is not up to the mark and needs to be improved."
"The documentation can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing has always seemed fair."
"The cost of the SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) can be considered high. We have elected to have SEEBURGER consulting do the installation. Licensing could also be considered high. However, one would be hard pressed to find another product that does all that this one does."
"I had a problem at one time with their invoicing. I told them, then we worked on the process and improved it. They installed the connection between SAP and SEEBURGER BIS in Europe first. This was awhile ago. When I came along, I became involved in the project and started working with them. Every time that I made a request, the work was done well, but I was not receiving my invoices. I knew I had to pay for the work and was trying to find someone to send me the invoices or a report of what was being done. From that end, it was really not working. After a few years, I was complaining and not happy. At the end of the year, they would come with a long list of invoices to pay, which was really bad. So, I asked for a change. We worked on the process, and since five years ago, I have worked with SEEBURGER based in North America. Now, when I have a question, I know who to contact. They send me a report with invoices every month. They really reacted to my concern, and we improved the process. Since then, I have had no problem."
"I have had exposure to other big vendors over the years and would have to say the pricing is pretty typical. They all fall into a common pricing range, at least the bigger vendors: Axway, IBM Sterling, Globalscape, and SEEBURGER. They all fall into that mid-tier pricing. So, SEEBURGER is commensurate with other large integration vendors operating in this space. Maybe it is lower than some of the really high-end ones. You can get some of these high-end transactional messaging integration systems, like TIBCO, that tend to be kind of on a higher echelon of pricing. I would say SEEBURGER is more mid-level."
"The pricing and licensing is very competitive."
"There is a standard agreement for the messaging every month. But if we make a change request — a change to a mapping or something like that — then there is a fixed price per hour."
"We pay for a maximum number of setups, then we pay per customer map, and we pay maintenance on each one of those. BIS provides the flexibility to pay as you grow. The price of each customer map is €200 and the hourly rate for maintenance is fairly reasonable."
"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want..."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
University
10%
Program Development Consultancy
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
9%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise38
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apollo GraphOS?
I am not sensitive to nor very knowledgeable about the pricing and setup cost.
What needs improvement with Apollo GraphOS?
I think Apollo GraphOS can be improved since teams new to GraphQL federation may find concepts such as subgraphs, schema composition, contracts, and router configuration take time to understand, ma...
What is your primary use case for Apollo GraphOS?
My main use case for Apollo GraphOS is creating APIs with GraphQL. I create subgraphs and schema composition, contracts, schema registry, and change validation, which helps me prevent breaking chan...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.
What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...
What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SEEBURGER BIS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza
Find out what your peers are saying about Apollo GraphOS vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.