No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Apollo GraphOS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apollo GraphOS
Ranking in API Management
18th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
4.1
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SEEBURGER Business Integrat...
Ranking in API Management
23rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apollo GraphOS is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Apollo GraphOS0.8%
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite1.4%
Other97.8%
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Unified schemas have streamlined team collaboration and have reduced API-related deployment issues
We had a positive experience with Apollo GraphOS, but there are a few areas where I think it could be improved. One area is the learning curve around GraphQL Federation and schema governance. Teams that are new to federated architectures often need to understand best practices. More guided onboarding, built-in recommendations, and practical examples would make adoption easier. I also think the observability and troubleshooting experience could be enhanced, particularly when diagnosing issues that span multiple subgraphs. While the platform provides useful insights, tracing complex requests across a federated environment can still require additional investigations. Another improvement would be more granular administrative controls and reporting, especially for larger organizations where different teams manage different parts of the GraphQL platform. Although the CI/CD integration is one of the product's strengths, having more out-of-the-box integrations and similar configurations for popular DevOps tools would reduce the initial setup effort. These suggestions would make the platform easier to adopt, operate, and scale, particularly for organizations that are beginning their GraphQL Federation journey. One thing I would like to see in future releases is deeper operational visibility for large-scale federated environments. As the number of subgraphs and development teams grows, it becomes more important to quickly identify where performance bottlenecks or schema-related issues are originating without having to correlate information from multiple tools. More built-in governance capabilities would be valuable, such as stronger policy enforcement, approval workflows for schema changes, and richer reporting for platform administrators. Another area that could be improved is the onboarding experience. While the documentation is comprehensive, having more guided setup wizards, architectures, and real-world implementation examples would help new teams become productive more quickly. I would also like to see even broader integrations with common enterprise monitoring, security, and development platforms so organizations can manage Apollo GraphOS as part of their existing operational ecosystem rather than relying on additional customization. These points would make day-to-day administration easier and improve the experience for organizations running GraphQL at a larger scale.
SS
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration
The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Apollo GraphOS has had a positive impact on our organization by making our API development process more structured, predictable, and collaborative."
"Apollo GraphOS has significantly enhanced both the developer experience and product delivery timelines by offering a centralized approach to managing GraphQL schemas and services, helping reduce overhead and improve collaboration between frontend and backend teams."
"Apollo GraphOS has had a positive impact by improving the way we manage and evolve our GraphQL APIs."
"The most valuable features of Apollo GraphOS OS for me are its security and authentication processes."
"Apollo GraphOS has positively impacted our organization by reducing unwanted code and helping us combine multiple services."
"For the tool that we used to have, we had specially trained developers who used to do all the development of EDI maps and the configuration. But with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) now, we were able to train our EDI analysts, and because the tool has very simple, intuitive mapping capabilities, even our EDI analysts are able to develop all the EDI maps, do all the configurations, and do all the setups for any of the trading partners."
"What would have been a manual process of transmitting data items around between us and third-parties has been automated. SEEBURGER BIS handles the automation and mapping side of the communications. The automation, along with the efficiency around time and cost, has improved our organization. Around 20,000 messages a month have been automated. These typically would be financial/order transactions and confirmations in invoicing that have been automated."
"SEEBURGER is a global company who offers a presence not only in the United States, but is also international across the globe, offering world-class services, a 24/7 support model, and managed services, with about 95 percent of a million files a month SLA, 99.9 percent uptime, and a response time normally under four hours if there is an issue at all."
"SEEBURGER BIS increased our efficiency by at least 30 percent."
"It's a very robust solution and it's very configurable. Before this product we would use an ESB-type of solution which required us to write code and go through a process. We can configure the SEEBURGER solution much more easily, instead of writing code... It can handle large files very well."
"Sitting around with SEEBURGER at a seminar in December and discussing their project plan for the future, I think this product is the way to go."
"Fault tolerance, we rarely get hanged processes, therefore, it is reliable."
"When orders come in they go into our ERP system directly, so there is integration there."
 

Cons

"The reason I held back from giving it a perfect score is that some enterprise scenarios still require additional effort."
"There’s room for improvement in schema collaboration tools, especially in large teams where multiple developers are working on overlapping parts of the API."
"I rated it six out of ten because while it offers useful capabilities such as schema management, schema validation, and API observability, I feel there are several areas that need improvement."
"Apollo GraphOS OS is using a detailed project, and it can be time-consuming because it has a lot of data to manage. It sometimes takes longer than three seconds, which can affect loading times and lead to user dissatisfaction. I would like to see improved performance."
"I don't think the scalability of the solution is that great because they have tied the solution to their named nodes and it does not allow scalability like some of the cloud products allow."
"There are some aspects at the front, the actual queries that you use, that could be improved. They're all very minor to be honest."
"When we got SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS), it was clear that it was going to take more of a technical person. It does take a technically-rooted individual to operate it. It's not something for your everyday guy to do. For what it's doing for us, a dedicated resource is required."
"We occasionally get ZIP files. Sometimes the ZIP file has one file inside of it, and sometimes the ZIP file might have 30 files inside of it. We have been working with SEEBURGER to enhance their PKUNZIP process to be able to unzip multiple files in a single workflow instead of just one file. This is still something that is in process."
"It's rather difficult to understand, from the application, what's broken and why it doesn't work. We typically need to get support from them directly, and it's usually in a consulting role, to fix issues."
"The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new transactions from scratch or performing search queries."
"Their traditional model is a vendor flow. We are looking to do a customer-based flow, which which require significant development from SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). We are working with them to do this using their WebEDI. It is a brand new area for them, but it could be an option in the future."
"On the server side, there are a lot of administration and configuration files that you need to go in and do maintenance on. You have to find them in a certain folder so it's very error-prone and it can be a little time consuming unless it's documented. They could pull some of those individual configuration files into the product itself where there's a better user interface for that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing and licensing is very competitive."
"The way they have their licensing structure set up, they have a lot of different modules. For us, we did not really know if we were licensed for certain things or not. We had to reach out to them multiple times to tell them that we were looking for this or that capability. We had to buy licenses for different things at different points in time, not knowing that we could have it bundled initially."
"We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable."
"The pricing seems to be competitive and the maintenance is standard."
"We pay for a maximum number of setups, then we pay per customer map, and we pay maintenance on each one of those. BIS provides the flexibility to pay as you grow. The price of each customer map is €200 and the hourly rate for maintenance is fairly reasonable."
"There is a standard agreement for the messaging every month. But if we make a change request — a change to a mapping or something like that — then there is a fixed price per hour."
"The solution provides the flexibility to start small and pay as you grow. SEEBURGER has a lot of offerings..."
"We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
University
12%
Program Development Consultancy
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
9%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise38
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apollo GraphOS?
I am not sensitive to nor very knowledgeable about the pricing and setup cost.
What needs improvement with Apollo GraphOS?
Overall, I've had a good experience, but if I had to choose one improvement, it would be improving the onboarding and troubleshooting experience for large GraphQL environments. A better diagnostic ...
What is your primary use case for Apollo GraphOS?
My main use case for Apollo GraphOS is managing and monitoring GraphQL APIs across the development life cycle. I use it to manage our GraphQL schema, validate schema changes before deployment, and ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.
What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...
What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SEEBURGER BIS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza
Find out what your peers are saying about Apollo GraphOS vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.