Apigee vs Red Hat Integration comparison

Google and Red Hat are both solutions in the API Management category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #43. Google holds a 6.8% mindshare in APIM, compared to Red Hat’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Apigee

Read 90 Apigee reviews

13,789 Views
13,237 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Red Hat Integration

Read 2 Red Hat Integration reviews

723 Views
723 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apigee

Red Hat Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apigee and Red Hat Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Apigee vs. Red Hat Integration Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. Red Hat Integration

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apigee

Ranking in API Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (12th)

Red Hat Integration

Ranking in API Management

43rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Apigee is 6.8%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Integration is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apigee	6.8%
Red Hat Integration	0.6%
Other	92.6%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Amandeep Pawar

Senior Engineer at Airy Software Technologies Private Limited

Centralized API gateway has improved microservice security and provided deep traffic analytics

Apigee's API gateway could be improved. There are some limitations for high throughputs, which we can address. Overall, Apigee is a robust API management platform where we can configure centralized traffic management, but there are a few areas for improvement. The developer experience could be more intuitive, especially for configurations and complex API proxies and policies. Debugging production issues can sometimes be challenging, so more detailed diagnostic and easier-to-use troubleshooting tools would be valuable. The analytics dashboard could offer more customization and deeper insights without requiring additional configuration. Simplifying pricing and licensing would make Apigee more accessible for smaller organizations. I would like better support for cloud-native deployments, Kubernetes integrations, and AI-assisted policy recommendations. I would also like to see AI-assisted troubleshooting, more customizable analytics and developer portal, better enterprise documentation, easier policy configuration, and a simplified licensing model to enhance both the developer experience and day-to-day operations.

Read full review

CHEW YONG

Principle Solution Architect at beans

Facilitates seamless integration while offering room for OpenShift flexibility

I am still a reseller for IBM products today. I focus on integration solutions. For integration, my clients are using CP4I. For CP4I, I'm using ACE-S, API Connect, and MQ. These are the three products I'm selling from IBM. My clients are using IBM App Connect on-premises. I basically sell open source, specifically Red Hat Integration for integration purposes. Red Hat Integration is part of the Red Hat Integration bundle, which includes two different software solutions bundled together with Red Hat. It's bundled with the OpenShift plus the foundation. I am a Principal Solution Architect. I would be available for them to reach out by email for any questions or comments regarding my review. I want to be a reference for them. I rate Red Hat Integration an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The usability is one of the best aspects of the product and it is broadly used in different functional areas, almost in all the contexts that we have."

"The most valuable feature is monetization."

"The most valuable feature of Apigee is its simplicity of deploying an API and restricting access, like rate limit, with the API."

"Apigee brings a lot of projects, including development projects; for example, when an oil company is swiping a card in the palm station for payment of oil, as it swipes, it hits the database, and Apigee manages the entire process with the help of dedicated proxies, and managing those proxies is very easy, and Apigee makes proxy management very simple."

"They capture the details of all the incoming and outgoing traffic of your APIs. Based on 300+ default dimensions you can generate beautiful and insightful reports on usage and consumption of APIs."

"The initial setup isn't too complex."

"I like implementing different policies, for example, rate-limiting policy."

"The capabilities are very powerful."

More Apigee pros

"The most valuable features of Red Hat Integration lie in its ease of customization for business needs and the flexibility to design workflows according to specific requirements."

"Real-time event streaming is good because you can do real-time data insight, monitor any event that happens, take the action, and provide a real-time dashboard based on certain data."

Cons

"Apigee's API gateway could be improved. There are some limitations for high throughputs, which we can address."

"They need to work on the cost of the solution."

"I would like to see the monitoring, dashboards, and reports improve."

"Apigee on premise is quite complex and it is always moving faster."

"Proxy versioning seems a bit confusing and buried in the publishing experience, especially for the URI-based versioning approach."

"Google isn't enthusiastic about supporting older versions. Google is now trying to move all of its clients to X within the cloud."

"iPaaS is something that we would like to see. For example, MuleSoft is kind of an integrated platform as a service (iPaaS), and it provides a lot of out-of-the-box connectors and other such things. This is where Apigee lacks. I'm not sure if that's the roadmap for Apigee, but any improvements on those lines would be helpful where things become easier to implement."

"The solution tends to hide the limitations to keep selling the product."

More Apigee cons

"The disadvantage of Red Hat Integration is that it has to be tightly coupled to the OpenShift platform, so I couldn't run it on any platform other than OpenShift."

"The performance of a few computations for the message broker version could be more stable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the licensing is based on the number of API calls that are made."

"The current version of Apigee is not too expensive, but we are currently in talks with Google to understand their roadmap for Apigee X. However, we anticipate that with the introduction of Apigee X, the pricing will likely increase."

"My clients pay for a license."

"The tool is extremely expensive."

"The solution is a bit expensive. It's not for organizations in the early stages of their lifecycle but is more suited for mid- to enterprise-level platforms. Pricing varies by deployment model, with SaaS being the cheapest, costing around $100,000 per year for a subscription. For hybrid and on-prem deployments, the price increases. The on-prem model includes a license and additional installation and configuration professional service costs, which can be at least $40,000 to $60,000 for the initial setup. While it's not cheap, it offers long-term value and can be worthwhile."

"Pricing options need to be chosen on a case-by-case basis."

"The product's pricing is fair. You need to pay additional costs for the support."

"In Latin America, Apigee is expensive. It's not for small businesses; it's more for big businesses."

More Apigee pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive platform and not suitable for small companies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	67

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Apigee or Amazon API Gateway?

Amazon API Gateway is a platform that supports the creation and publication of API for web applications. The platform can support thousands of simultaneous API calls, and it provides monitoring, ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apigee?

There is room for improvement with Apigee as OPDK private cloud enhancements have stopped, focusing only on Apigee hybrid and Apigee X, with Google no longer adding new features to OPDK private clo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Integration?

The disadvantage of Red Hat Integration is that it has to be tightly coupled to the OpenShift platform, so I couldn't run it on any platform other than OpenShift.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Integration?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Integration?

The use cases for Red Hat Integration are integration and transformation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Apigee

Compared 27% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Apigee

Compared 6% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Apigee

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs Apigee

Compared 5% of the time

More Apigee Competitors

3scale API Management vs Red Hat Integration

Compared 42% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Red Hat Integration

Compared 38% of the time

Perforce Acana vs Red Hat Integration

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Red Hat Integration

Compared 9% of the time

More Red Hat Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apigee

August 2026

Download Apigee product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

August 2026

Download Red Hat Integration product report

Overview

Apigee offers API management, analytics, and developer portals with robust security, scalability, and flexibility. Its hybrid deployment ensures data privacy, while analytics tools support insightful decision-making, making it suitable for organizations seeking comprehensive API solutions.

Apigee provides a seamless platform for managing APIs, integrating external and internal applications. It serves as an API gateway, featuring robust security and scalability, supporting OAuth and rate-limiting policies. Organizations appreciate its ease of use, integration capabilities, and documented resources. The hybrid deployment model ensures private data remains on-premise, while the orchestration layer increases security. With a drag-and-drop interface and customization options, policy management becomes straightforward. Its analytics and monitoring tools offer insights into traffic patterns and API performance. However, users desire improvements in role-based access, code versioning integration, and traffic handling. Suggestions include enhanced security, support, automation, and a more flexible pricing model.

What are Apigee's Key Features?

API Management: Simplifies API exposure and manages internal and external APIs efficiently.
Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns and API performance for informed decision-making.
Security: Enforces OAuth, rate-limiting, and other protocols to secure data.
Developer Portals: Supports developer onboarding with comprehensive tools and documentation.
Hybrid Deployment: Ensures data privacy by keeping sensitive information on-premise.

What Benefits Can Organizations Gain from Apigee?

Ease of Use: Streamlined integration and policy management with a drag-and-drop interface.
Scalability: Adapts to increase in traffic and ensures performance consistency.
Flexibility: Offers customizable options to suit unique API management needs.
Comprehensive Insights: Analytics tools for monitoring API performance and user engagement.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Apigee is extensively used for developing proxies, implementing security protocols, and managing APIs. Organizations leverage its capabilities to facilitate seamless API interactions, fostering developer onboarding and API customization. The platform supports API gateways for enhanced security, scalability, and insights, proving crucial for managing extensive application networks.

Google

Red Hat Integration is a comprehensive platform that facilitates agile integration, connecting applications, data, and devices. Designed for developers and enterprises, it offers modern integration features to streamline operations and enhance connectivity.

Red Hat Integration provides an efficient solution for creating and managing integrations with its robust tools and services. It supports modern IT environments, promoting collaboration and reducing complexity with its open-source technology. Key features like messaging, transformation, and service orchestration empower businesses to implement flexible integration strategies seamlessly.

What are the key features of Red Hat Integration?

Messaging: Connects applications through various messaging patterns for scalable data exchange.
Data Transformation: Enables efficient data processing across diverse systems.
API Management: Offers comprehensive API control and security measures.
Service Orchestration: Integrates multiple services to create cohesive processes.
Event-Driven Architecture: Supports responsive application design through real-time events.

What benefits and ROI should you consider?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines integration processes, saving time and resources.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business demands with ease.
Flexibility: Provides multiple integration methods to suit different needs.
Cost Savings: Reduces operational costs by leveraging open-source solutions.

Red Hat Integration finds its application in industries like finance and healthcare, where it plays a vital role in secure data processing and compliance management. Its flexibility and scalable architecture make it a preferred choice for enterprises aiming to enhance their digital capabilities through efficient system integration.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Adobe, advance.net, Amadeus, AT&T, Bechtel, Belly, Burberry, Chegg, Citrix, Dell, eBay, Equifax, GameStop, First Data, Globe, HCSC, Intralinks, Kao, Meredith, Mitchell, Orange, Pearson

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Apigee vs. Red Hat Integration

August 2026

Free Report: Apigee vs. Red Hat Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Apigee vs. Red Hat Integration and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apigee vs. Red Hat Integration report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.