Apache Spark and Azure Stream Analytics are top contenders in real-time data processing, with Azure Stream Analytics often considered superior for its seamless Azure integration and user-friendly interface, despite Apache Spark's cost-effectiveness in large-scale processing. Spark's in-memory processing offers an advantage in handling extensive datasets.
Features: Apache Spark is known for Spark Streaming, efficient Spark SQL querying, and MLlib's advanced machine learning capabilities, excelling in speed and scalability. Azure Stream Analytics provides robust real-time analytics, easily integrates with Microsoft ecosystems, benefiting IoT solutions and Azure infrastructures.
Room for Improvement: Apache Spark could improve real-time query performance, integrate better for non-technical users, and enhance memory management and error logs. Azure Stream Analytics may benefit from increased flexibility, improved data validation, and better integration with non-Azure services.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Spark offers flexible deployment options across environments, backed by community support, while Azure Stream Analytics provides straightforward cloud deployment and higher-rated customer service, though criticized for high costs outside the Azure ecosystem.
Pricing and ROI: Apache Spark, being open-source, is cost-effective and appealing for large-scale deployments without licensing fees, offering significant cost savings and high ROI. In contrast, Azure Stream Analytics has competitive pricing aligned with usage, leveraging Azure's expansive service infrastructure, balancing its higher costs with integration capabilities.
The support on critical issues depends on the level of subscription that you have with Microsoft itself.
They've managed to answer all my questions and provide help in a timely manner.
There is a big communication gap due to lack of understanding of local scenarios and language barriers.
Maintenance requires a couple of people, however, it's not a full-time endeavor.
Azure Stream Analytics is scalable, and I would rate it seven out of ten.
MapReduce needs to perform numerous disk input and output operations, while Apache Spark can use memory to store and process data.
They require significant effort and fine-tuning to function effectively.
A cost comparison between products is also not straightforward.
There's setup time required to get it integrated with different services such as Power BI, so it's not a straight out-of-the-box configuration.
Although customers can invite Microsoft Taiwan office staff for introductions, there are not many useful case references, suggesting room for improvement in market support.
The Azure solution is better now, and competitors, even within Microsoft, may offer solutions that could make it cheaper.
Regarding the cost of Azure Stream Analytics, I believe the price is reasonable for the tool.
We sell the data analytics value and operational value to customers, focusing on productivity and efficiency from the cloud.
Not all solutions can make this data fast enough to be used, except for solutions such as Apache Spark Structured Streaming.
It's very accurate and uses existing technologies in terms of writing queries, utilizing standard query languages such as SQL, Spark, and others to provide information.
Clients can choose and subscribe to the service items they need, making it more flexible than IBM solutions, especially in data analytics or data governance.
It is quite easy for my technicians to understand, and the learning curve is not steep.
Spark provides programmers with an application programming interface centered on a data structure called the resilient distributed dataset (RDD), a read-only multiset of data items distributed over a cluster of machines, that is maintained in a fault-tolerant way. It was developed in response to limitations in the MapReduce cluster computing paradigm, which forces a particular linear dataflowstructure on distributed programs: MapReduce programs read input data from disk, map a function across the data, reduce the results of the map, and store reduction results on disk. Spark's RDDs function as a working set for distributed programs that offers a (deliberately) restricted form of distributed shared memory
Azure Stream Analytics is a robust real-time analytics service that has been designed for critical business workloads. Users are able to build an end-to-end serverless streaming pipeline in minutes. Utilizing SQL, users are able to go from zero to production with a few clicks, all easily extensible with unique code and automatic machine learning abilities for the most advanced scenarios.
Azure Stream Analytics has the ability to analyze and accurately process exorbitant volumes of high-speed streaming data from numerous sources at the same time. Patterns and scenarios are quickly identified and information is gathered from various input sources, such as social media feeds, applications, clickstreams, sensors, and devices. These patterns can then be implemented to trigger actions and launch workflows, such as feeding data to a reporting tool, storing data for later use, or creating alerts. Azure Stream Analytics is also offered on Azure IoT Edge runtime, so the data can be processed on IoT devices.
Top Benefits
Reviews from Real Users
“Azure Stream Analytics is something that you can use to test out streaming scenarios very quickly in the general sense and it is useful for IoT scenarios. If I was to do a project with IoT and I needed a streaming solution, Azure Stream Analytics would be a top choice. The most valuable features of Azure Stream Analytics are the ease of provisioning and the interface is not terribly complex.” - Olubisi A., Team Lead at a tech services company.
“It's used primarily for data and mining - everything from the telemetry data side of things. It's great for streaming and makes everything easy to handle. The streaming from the IoT hub and the messaging are aspects I like a lot.” - Sudhendra U., Technical Architect at Infosys
We monitor all Hadoop reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.