Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Kinesis vs Azure Stream Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon Kinesis offers significant cost savings, seamless integration, improved monitoring, and reduces data ingestion costs, enhancing ROI and architecture.
Sentiment score
5.3
Azure Stream Analytics offers quick, cost-effective deployment, resulting in positive ROI and customer satisfaction for non-complex scenarios.
With Lambda, there is no need for data transfer charges, which is beneficial for less frequent workloads.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Amazon Kinesis customer support is generally quick and effective, but experiences vary in technical guidance and response times.
Sentiment score
6.2
Azure Stream Analytics support is effective and responsive, with service quality varying by subscription and occasional communication challenges.
We receive prompt support from AWS solution architects or TAMs.
The support on critical issues depends on the level of subscription that you have with Microsoft itself.
There is a big communication gap due to lack of understanding of local scenarios and language barriers.
They've managed to answer all my questions and provide help in a timely manner.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Amazon Kinesis is scalable for reliable streaming, but complex processing and costs may vary with implementation and data volumes.
Sentiment score
7.2
Azure Stream Analytics is highly scalable, cloud-based, easily integrated, adaptable, and efficiently manages varying workloads, despite some cost concerns.
Amazon Kinesis provides auto-scaling with streams that handle large volumes well.
Maintenance requires a couple of people, however, it's not a full-time endeavor.
Azure Stream Analytics is scalable, and I would rate it seven out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon Kinesis is praised for stability and fault tolerance, though some users report slowdowns and capacity issues.
Sentiment score
6.3
Azure Stream Analytics is reliable but can face downtime, bugs, transformation challenges, and requires tuning for optimal stability.
They require significant effort and fine-tuning to function effectively.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon Kinesis requires improvements in throughput, automation, setup complexity, data retention, machine learning features, and user-friendly interfaces.
Azure Stream Analytics needs better pricing, logging, customization, connectivity, integration, UI, flexibility, support, error handling, and simplified licensing.
Amazon Kinesis could improve its pricing to be more competitive, especially for large volumes.
There's setup time required to get it integrated with different services such as Power BI, so it's not a straight out-of-the-box configuration.
A cost comparison between products is also not straightforward.
Regarding technical support for Azure Stream Analytics, it's not good.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Kinesis is cost-effective compared to self-managed solutions, but prices can increase with high data usage and features.
Azure Stream Analytics offers competitive pricing but can be costly for enterprises; users find billing reports confusing.
Amazon Kinesis and Lambda pricing is competitive, but we noticed that scaling and large volumes could potentially increase costs significantly.
The Azure solution is better now, and competitors, even within Microsoft, may offer solutions that could make it cheaper.
Regarding the cost of Azure Stream Analytics, I believe the price is reasonable for the tool.
We sell the data analytics value and operational value to customers, focusing on productivity and efficiency from the cloud.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Kinesis offers easy configuration, real-time analytics, and robust AWS integration, ideal for managing large, complex data workflows.
Azure Stream Analytics provides integrated, scalable real-time analytics with SQL queries and machine learning, enhancing data processing capabilities efficiently.
Lambda's scalability, seamless integration with other AWS services, and support for multiple programming languages are very beneficial.
It's very accurate and uses existing technologies in terms of writing queries, utilizing standard query languages such as SQL, Spark, and others to provide information.
It is quite easy for my technicians to understand, and the learning curve is not steep.
Clients can choose and subscribe to the service items they need, making it more flexible than IBM solutions, especially in data analytics or data governance.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Kinesis
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Azure Stream Analytics
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Amazon Kinesis is 7.1%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Stream Analytics is 8.1%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Streaming Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Amazon Kinesis7.1%
Azure Stream Analytics8.1%
Other84.8%
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Rajni Kumar Jha - PeerSpot reviewer
Used for media streaming and live-streaming data
It is not compulsory to use Amazon Kinesis. If you don't want to use the data streaming, you can use just the Kinesis data firehose. Using the Kinesis data firehose is compulsory because we can't store all chats and recordings in Amazon S3 without it. When a call comes in the Amazon Kinesis instance, it will go to Data Streams if we use it. Otherwise, it will go to the Kinesis data firehose, where we need to define the S3 bucket path, and it will go to Amazon S3. So, without the Kinesis data firehose, we can't store all the chats and recordings in Amazon S3. Using Amazon Kinesis totally depends upon the user's requirements. If you want to use live streaming for the data lake or data analyst team, you need to use Amazon Kinesis. If you don't want to use it, you can directly use the Kinesis data firehose, which will be stored in Amazon S3. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
SantiagoCordero - PeerSpot reviewer
Native connectors and integration simplify tasks but portfolio complexity needs addressing
There are too many products in the Azure landscape, which sometimes leads to overlap between them. Microsoft continuously releases new products or solutions, which can be frustrating when determining the appropriate features from one solution over another. A cost comparison between products is also not straightforward. They should simplify their portfolio. The Microsoft licensing system is confusing and not easy to understand, and this is something they should address. In the future, I may stop using Stream Analytics and move to other solutions. I discussed Palantir earlier, which is something I want to explore in depth because it allows me to accomplish more efficiently compared to solely using Azure. Additionally, the vendors should make the solution more user-friendly, incorporating low-code and no-code features. This is something I wish to explore further.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Kinesis?
Amazon Kinesis's main purpose is to provide near real-time data streaming at a consistent 2Mbps rate, which is really impressive.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Kinesis?
Amazon Kinesis and Lambda pricing is competitive, but we noticed that scaling and large volumes could potentially increase costs significantly.
What needs improvement with Amazon Kinesis?
Amazon Kinesis could improve its pricing to be more competitive, especially for large volumes. Also, the KCL library's documentation could be improved to better explain the configuration parameters...
Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?
Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their orga...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stream Analytics?
The solution does not need any license; it comes with your subscription.
What needs improvement with Azure Stream Analytics?
It does not always give you the right reason or the correct reason. For example, if a service is stopped, it just tells you that it stopped and started. It does not give you any good insight as to ...
 

Also Known As

Amazon AWS Kinesis, AWS Kinesis, Kinesis
ASA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zillow, Netflix, Sonos
Rockwell Automation, Milliman, Honeywell Building Solutions, Arcoflex Automation Solutions, Real Madrid C.F., Aerocrine, Ziosk, Tacoma Public Schools, P97 Networks
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Kinesis vs. Azure Stream Analytics and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.