

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Spot - A Flexera company and others in Compute Service.
Thanks to improvements on both our side in how we run processes and enhancements to Apache NiFi, we have reduced the time commitment to almost not needing to interact with Apache NiFi except for minor queue-clearance tasks, allowing it to run smoothly.
It supports not just ETL but also ELT, allowing us to save significant time.
There may be return on investment based on the technology and easily moving our workloads onto Apache NiFi from our previous system.
The customer support is really good, and they are helpful whenever concerns are posted, responding immediately.
Customer support for Apache NiFi has been excellent, with minimal response times whenever we raise cases that cannot be directly addressed by logs.
I would rate the customer support of Apache NiFi a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10.
There is a big communication gap due to lack of understanding of local scenarios and language barriers.
They've managed to answer all my questions and provide help in a timely manner.
The support on critical issues depends on the level of subscription that you have with Microsoft itself.
Depending on the workload we process, it remains stable since at the end of the day, it is just used as an orchestration tool that triggers the job while the heavy lifting is done on Spark servers.
Scaling up is fairly straightforward, provided you manage configurations effectively.
Based on the workload, more nodes can be added to make a bigger cluster, which enhances the cluster whenever needed.
Maintenance requires a couple of people, however, it's not a full-time endeavor.
This is crucial for applications demanding constant monitoring, such as healthcare or financial services.
Azure Stream Analytics is scalable, and I would rate it seven out of ten.
I have seen Apache NiFi crashing at times, which is one of the issues we have faced in production.
Apache NiFi is stable in most cases.
They require significant effort and fine-tuning to function effectively.
For example, Azure Stream Analytics processes more data every second, which is why it's recommended for real-time streaming.
Apache NiFi should have APIs or connectors that can connect seamlessly to other external entities, whether in the cloud or on-premises, creating a plug-and-play mechanism.
The history of processed files should be more readable so that not only the centralized teams managing Apache NiFi but also application folks who are new to the platform can read how a specific document is traversing through Apache NiFi.
The initial error did not indicate it was related to memory or size limitations but appeared as a parsing error or something similar.
A cost comparison between products is also not straightforward.
There's setup time required to get it integrated with different services such as Power BI, so it's not a straight out-of-the-box configuration.
Azure Stream Analytics currently allows some degree of code writing, which could be simplified with low-code or no-code platforms to enhance performance.
The pricing in Italy is considered a little bit high, but the product is worth it.
Choosing between pay-as-you-go or enterprise models can affect pricing, and depending on data volume, charges might increase substantially.
From my point of view, it should be cheaper now, considering the years since its release.
We sell the data analytics value and operational value to customers, focusing on productivity and efficiency from the cloud.
Apache NiFi has positively impacted my organization by definitely bridging the gap between the on-premises and cloud interaction until we find a solution to open the firewall for cloud components to directly interact with on-premises services.
Development has improved with a reduction in time spent being the main benefit; before we needed a matter of days to create the ingestion flows, but now it only takes a couple of hours to configure.
The ease of use in Apache NiFi has helped my team because anyone can learn how to use it in a short amount of time, so we were able to get a lot of work done.
It's very accurate and uses existing technologies in terms of writing queries, utilizing standard query languages such as SQL, Spark, and others to provide information.
Azure Stream Analytics reads from any real-time stream; it's designed for processing millions of records every millisecond.
It is quite easy for my technicians to understand, and the learning curve is not steep.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Apache NiFi | 9.5% |
| AWS Lambda | 13.8% |
| AWS Batch | 12.9% |
| Other | 63.8% |
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Stream Analytics | 6.2% |
| Apache Flink | 12.3% |
| Databricks | 10.0% |
| Other | 71.5% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
Azure Stream Analytics is a robust real-time analytics service that has been designed for critical business workloads. Users are able to build an end-to-end serverless streaming pipeline in minutes. Utilizing SQL, users are able to go from zero to production with a few clicks, all easily extensible with unique code and automatic machine learning abilities for the most advanced scenarios.
Azure Stream Analytics has the ability to analyze and accurately process exorbitant volumes of high-speed streaming data from numerous sources at the same time. Patterns and scenarios are quickly identified and information is gathered from various input sources, such as social media feeds, applications, clickstreams, sensors, and devices. These patterns can then be implemented to trigger actions and launch workflows, such as feeding data to a reporting tool, storing data for later use, or creating alerts. Azure Stream Analytics is also offered on Azure IoT Edge runtime, so the data can be processed on IoT devices.
Top Benefits
Reviews from Real Users
“Azure Stream Analytics is something that you can use to test out streaming scenarios very quickly in the general sense and it is useful for IoT scenarios. If I was to do a project with IoT and I needed a streaming solution, Azure Stream Analytics would be a top choice. The most valuable features of Azure Stream Analytics are the ease of provisioning and the interface is not terribly complex.” - Olubisi A., Team Lead at a tech services company.
“It's used primarily for data and mining - everything from the telemetry data side of things. It's great for streaming and makes everything easy to handle. The streaming from the IoT hub and the messaging are aspects I like a lot.” - Sudhendra U., Technical Architect at Infosys
We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.