Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud vs Rockset comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Kafka on Confluent C...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rockset
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Vector Databases (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the AWS Marketplace category, the mindshare of Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is 0.8%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rockset is 0.1%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

Ritik Varshney - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced data streaming with reliable features and good analytics
Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud provides an enhanced level of reliability and resources compared to Apache Kafka alone. It offers more features which are beneficial for our clients, including cluster linking, schema registry, error handling, and dead-letter queues. It significantly improves customer and publisher satisfaction, especially with topic integration and data streaming.
Raghavendra Sao - PeerSpot reviewer
Used to get data from the database faster
Rockset is an easy tool, and anyone can use it. The solution provides some type of data grouping. This grouping of data based on some parameters is not simple, but it is very useful. I would recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Confluent Cloud handles data volume pretty well."
"Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is more reliable and frequent to use compared to Apache Kafka."
"Overall, I think it's a good experience. Apache Kafka can be quite complex and difficult to maintain on your own, so using Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud makes it much easier to use it without worrying about setup and maintenance."
"Kafka and Confluent Cloud have proven to be cost-effective, especially when compared to other tools. In a recent BI integration program over the past year, we assessed multiple use cases spanning ship-to-shore and various Azure integrations. Our findings revealed that Confluent Kafka performed exceptionally well, standing out alongside Genesys and Azure Event Hubs. While these three are top contenders, the choice among other tools depends on the specific use case and project requirements. The customer initially used tools like SMQs, FITRA, and Stream for real-time data processing. However, after our recommendation, Confluent Cloud proved to be a superior choice, capable of replacing these three tools and simplifying their data infrastructure. This shift to a single tool, Confluent Cloud, streamlined their operations, making maintenance and management more efficient for their internal projects."
"Kafka provides handy properties that allow us to directly configure the data, whether to keep it or discard it after use."
"The state-saving feature is very much appreciated. It allows me to rewind a certain process if I see an error and then reprocess it."
"In case of huge transactions on the web or mobile apps, it helps you capture real-time data and analyze it."
"The product's installation phase is pretty straightforward for us since we know how to use it."
"The initial setup was very simple."
"Rockset is very fast, and you can query just like in MySQL."
 

Cons

"The solution is expensive."
"There are some premium connectors, for example, available in Confluent, which you cannot access in the marketplace, so there are some limitations."
"Some areas for improvement in Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud include issues faced during migration with Kubernetes pods."
"There could be an in-built feature for data analysis."
"Maybe in terms of Apache Kafka's integration with other Microsoft tools, our company faced some challenges."
"There's one thing that's a common use case, but I don't know why it's not covered in Kafka. When a message comes in, and another message with the same key arrives, the first version should be deleted automatically."
"Regarding real-time data usage, there were challenges with CDC (Change Data Capture) integrations. Specifically, with PyTRAN, we encountered difficulties. We recommended using our on-premises Kaspersky as an alternative to PyTRAN for that specific use case due to issues with CDC store configuration and log reading challenges with the iton components."
"The administration port could be more extensive."
"Filtering the database based on indexes is difficult in Rockset and should be simplified."
"Rockset is now bought by OpenAI. It’s uncertain if Rockset will continue to exist as it is."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the pricing is fair, but Confluent requires a little bit more thinking because the price can go up really quickly when it comes to premium connectors."
"Regarding pricing, Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is not a cheap tool. The right use case would justify the cost. It might make sense if you have a high volume of data that you can leverage to generate value for the business. But if you don't have those requirements, there are likely cheaper solutions you could use instead."
"I consider that the product's price falls under the middle range category."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Transportation Company
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud?
Kafka and Confluent Cloud have proven to be cost-effective, especially when compared to other tools. In a recent BI integration program over the past year, we assessed multiple use cases spanning s...
What needs improvement with Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud?
The ability to implement request-response communication on Apache Kafka ( /products/apache-kafka-reviews ) needs improvement. The schema registry is a bit misleading in terms of its location and ho...
What is your primary use case for Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud?
We send events to Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud ( /products/apache-kafka-on-confluent-cloud-reviews ) for microservices and in an event-driven system. We are building an event-driven system, and ...
What needs improvement with Rockset?
For our use, there is no room for improvement. It depends on how you use it, however, from our perspective, it has met our needs.
What is your primary use case for Rockset?
We used Rockset as an SQL interface on some of DynamoDB. Our use case is primarily for customer-facing data reporting.
What advice do you have for others considering Rockset?
Rockset is now bought by OpenAI. It’s uncertain if Rockset will continue to exist as it is. OpenAI may have its own agenda for it. They have started canceling some contracts with customers, so this...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud vs. Rockset and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.