Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud vs Kali Linux comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Confluent Logo
294 views|265 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Kali Linux Logo
138 views|126 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud and Kali Linux based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two AWS Marketplace solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud vs. Kali Linux Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In case of huge transactions on the web or mobile apps, it helps you capture real-time data and analyze it.""I use it for real-time processing workloads. So, in some instances, it's like IoT data. We need to put it into a data lake.""Kafka and Confluent Cloud have proven to be cost-effective, especially when compared to other tools. In a recent BI integration program over the past year, we assessed multiple use cases spanning ship-to-shore and various Azure integrations. Our findings revealed that Confluent Kafka performed exceptionally well, standing out alongside Genesys and Azure Event Hubs. While these three are top contenders, the choice among other tools depends on the specific use case and project requirements. The customer initially used tools like SMQs, FITRA, and Stream for real-time data processing. However, after our recommendation, Confluent Cloud proved to be a superior choice, capable of replacing these three tools and simplifying their data infrastructure. This shift to a single tool, Confluent Cloud, streamlined their operations, making maintenance and management more efficient for their internal projects."

More Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud Pros →

"The solution's stability is very good.""Kali Linux is much better than other OS because it gives you a good set of tools. It is preferred for vulnerability assessments and cybersecurity.""Additionally, it now includes comprehensive migration analytics and reporting capabilities.""We use the product for open-source intelligence and identifying vulnerabilities.""I'm mostly using for the web security web application, so end map and the troubleshoot will it's my price, and it's available in ColliNX.""The most valuable feature of Kali Linux is the attack it performs using a CVE script that's already on the internet.""I use the tool with Nmap to perform network audits. We use it to find vulnerabilities in our network through attacks. It's for those who want to launch or create viruses or perform attacks on systems. With Kali Linux, you can conduct penetration testing for networks, web applications, and Android mobile apps.""The tools available in Kali Linux are incredibly effective for conducting security assessments."

More Kali Linux Pros →

Cons
"There could be an in-built feature for data analysis.""Regarding real-time data usage, there were challenges with CDC (Change Data Capture) integrations. Specifically, with PyTRAN, we encountered difficulties. We recommended using our on-premises Kaspersky as an alternative to PyTRAN for that specific use case due to issues with CDC store configuration and log reading challenges with the iton components.""For the original Kafka, there is room for improvement in terms of latency spikes and resource consumption. It consumes a lot of memory."

More Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud Cons →

"Any new user or someone without deep expertise won't be able to understand how to scale or manage it""The product should integrate AI and GPT capabilities.""There can be some lagging issues because the product gets stuck at times, making it an area of concern where improvements are required.""From an improvement perspective, Kali Linux could include more ML to help with academic literature, as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings in the solution.""I would like to have automation in Kali Linux instead of manually configuring or setting up something in case of an upgrade.""I would like for them to offer more features for the free version in order for users to test them in their internal environment before purchasing.""Unfortunately, my current tool runs on Windows 10, and its use is restricted to enterprise versions. Integrating this tool or similar functionalities into Kali Linux for non-enterprise users would be incredibly valuable.""The installation process of Kali Linux can be slow, particularly when installing and upgrading packages within virtualized environments."

More Kali Linux Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's quite affordable considering the value it provides."
  • More Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Kali Linux is a free product, and you don't have to pay for a license."
  • "There is no need to make any payments towards the licensing costs since it is a solution that is available for free."
  • "Kali Linux is open source."
  • "It is an open-source tool."
  • "I use it free of charge."
  • "The licensing fee is expensive compared to other products."
  • "The tool is open-source."
  • "The price is good because Kali Linux already provides a good bundle of tools."
  • More Kali Linux Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Kafka and Confluent Cloud have proven to be cost-effective, especially when compared to other tools. In a recent BI integration program over the past year, we assessed multiple use cases spanning… more »
    Top Answer:I saw an interesting improvement related to the analytics environment.
    Top Answer:We use Apache Kafka with Confluent Cloud for specific real-time transaction use cases, both on-premise and in the cloud. We have been using Confluent Cloud for about five years. We initially used it… more »
    Top Answer:The interface is good and straightforward to use.
    Top Answer:In the older versions of the solution, there were problems with the UI. Improvements are only required in the UI of the product's older version. In the latest version of the product, the UI is good… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 130 in AWS Marketplace
    Views
    294
    Comparisons
    265
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    436
    Rating
    8.5
    8th
    out of 130 in AWS Marketplace
    Views
    138
    Comparisons
    126
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    345
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Kali Linux
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Confluent Cloud is a resilient, scalable streaming data service based on Apache Kafka®, delivered as a fully managed service. Confluent Cloud has a web interface and local command line interface. You can manage cluster resources, settings, and billing with the web interface. You can use Confluent CLI to create and manage Kafka topics. Sign up for Confluent Cloud to get started.

    Kali Linux is an open-source, Debian-based Linux distribution geared towards various information security tasks, such as Penetration Testing, Security Research, Computer Forensics and Reverse Engineering.
    Kali Linux is an open-source, Debian-based Linux distribution geared towards various information security tasks, such as Penetration Testing, Security Research, Computer Forensics and Reverse Engineering.
    A version of Kali is always close to you, no matter where you need it. Mobile devices, Containers, ARM, Cloud providers, Windows Subsystem for Linux, Pre-built Virtual Machine, Installer Images, and others are all available.
    The Kali Linux penetration testing platform contains a vast array of tools and utilities. From information gathering to final reporting, Kali Linux enables security and IT professionals to assess the security of their systems.

    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Educational Organization12%
    Government10%
    Outsourcing Company10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business73%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud vs. Kali Linux
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud vs. Kali Linux and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is ranked 5th in AWS Marketplace with 4 reviews while Kali Linux is ranked 8th in AWS Marketplace with 10 reviews. Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is rated 8.6, while Kali Linux is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud writes "Helps us manage transactions effectively and integrates seamlessly with our data analysis tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kali Linux writes "Offers good UI and is useful for vulnerability assessment". Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is most compared with Bitnami, Conductor Cloud Rendering and Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, whereas Kali Linux is most compared with Security Onion, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), Rocky Linux, Windows 10 and CentOS. See our Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud vs. Kali Linux report.

    See our list of best AWS Marketplace vendors.

    We monitor all AWS Marketplace reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.