

Rocky Linux and Kali Linux are both competing in the Linux distribution category, with Rocky Linux taking the upper hand in enterprise environments due to its stability and compatibility with Red Hat, whereas Kali Linux is favored in security-focused tasks with its comprehensive toolkit.
Features: Rocky Linux is noted for its stability, compatibility with Red Hat, and extensive community support. It is a strong option for enterprises seeking a CentOS alternative. Additionally, Rocky Linux is community-driven with regular security patches and updates. Kali Linux is geared towards security professionals, offering tools like Nmap, Metasploit, and SQLMap for penetration testing. It allows comprehensive vulnerability assessments, runs from a USB for security audits, and is open source.
Room for Improvement: Rocky Linux could enhance its integration with Active Directory and improve on clarity in market positioning. Improved update releases and security advisories are also areas to work on. Kali Linux could enhance its user interface for beginners, improve hardware detection, and develop more intuitive GUI tools. Adding machine learning and AI integrations would further strengthen its capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rocky Linux is designed for on-premises and cloud environments, with users heavily relying on community support due to the lack of official customer service. It's particularly suitable for enterprises needing stable deployments. Kali Linux, primarily for security tasks, also benefits from strong community support, focusing on reliability and minimal need for customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Both Rocky Linux and Kali Linux are open-source, offering financial advantages by eliminating licensing costs. Rocky Linux provides a cost-effective alternative to commercial distributions, enhancing ROI with enterprise-level features at reduced costs. Kali Linux remains free, making it ideal for users needing robust security tools without incurring software licensing expenses.
Integrating Kali Linux with DevOps tools has resulted in reduced operational costs due to automated test cases, making it a worthwhile investment with significant returns by decreasing the attack surface area and the frequency of attack incidents.
If we had installed it on-premises or through other means, it would have incurred significant money and effort to create the VMs, deploy it on machines, and then delete and format it after use.
I have saved time by avoiding the lag I sometimes face on the TryHackMe in-built machine, and I have learned more efficiently.
When it comes to return on investment, a lot of money is saved since we moved from a purchased license to the open source provided by Rocky Linux.
ROI has been good as we have significant open source community involvement.
I have seen a return on investment since there was definitely money saved at the time due to the lack of need for licensing since Rocky is available openly.
Since most of the tools and other things are community-based, the documentation and other community support are very good.
I was able to solve the problems I was experiencing.
The support level is extraordinary, providing on-time assistance.
We have not yet needed to contact a vendor regarding Rocky Linux.
Even if we raise a support ticket, we receive a resolution or a reply from the team within two business days.
Regarding the scalability of Kali Linux for my work and projects, whenever I was conducting brute force attacks and provided more than two or three million lines of payload, the system would freeze.
I find Kali Linux very scalable.
If I need more workload, I would probably need more CPU, and Kali Linux will handle that properly.
Even if the server is not responding and we want to attach the volume on another instance or a temporary instance, it is very easy and straightforward with no hiccups.
It has handled growth or changing needs well.
The scalability is quite good, though there are some issues with Rocky Linux.
Kali Linux is stable for my use cases, though not the latest version.
Kali Linux is very stable for my needs.
Rocky Linux is stable, scalable, and it is very much easier to use.
Rocky Linux is stable.
If real-time customized port scanning can be added, for example, instead of a default port such as 8080 or 443, if we can use a customized port such as 9876, that capability would be great.
I face significant challenges with Kali Linux regarding a major issue with the Grub loader becoming corrupted, which makes it very difficult to recover data.
Making Kali Linux more customizable would allow users to personalize it to their style.
It is based on customer requirements, as they might want to use Rocky Linux or Ubuntu, depending on their needs.
Rocky Linux could be improved by having more integration with Kubernetes.
Currently, it takes more than one month to release a new package or kernel, so speeding that up would help reduce reported vulnerability remediations.
Kali Linux is free software, an operating system that's available to download without any cost or licensing fees.
I simply create a VM, so there are no costs involved.
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Kali Linux has been positive, as it operates under an open-source model.
We switched to Rocky Linux because of the license price, and in our business, we don't need to have a higher cost as that is not a good idea.
There is no extra cost for a license if we are purchasing Rocky Linux from the AWS Marketplace.
Rocky Linux is free, and I can download it and deploy it in whatever environment I have, whether it be H3C, VMware, or Hyper-V.
Kali Linux has positively impacted my organization by improving efficiency in penetration testing; its open-source nature permits extensive customization and inclusion of numerous comprehensive pre-installed tools, contributing to a secure network environment with effective monitoring of network applications.
A unique and really helpful feature of Kali Linux, compared to other operating systems, is that many of the offensive security tools are already pre-configured and pre-installed.
Kali Linux positively impacts my organization by allowing us to monitor changes and security posture for the company.
Rocky Linux has positively impacted my organization, specifically through cost savings, because we did not have to buy any licenses or extra licenses of other distros, such as Oracle or Red Hat.
For production deployment, Rocky Linux is a great choice because it offers full RHEL compatibility without licensing costs, along with strong community support.
Since migrating to Rocky Linux, I've seen specific outcomes such as improved security because CentOS stopped the project, and security patches aren't being released.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Rocky Linux | 13.0% |
| Kali Linux | 3.3% |
| Other | 83.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
Kali Linux is widely used by organizations for penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, web application security, network audits, ethical hacking, and open-source intelligence, providing extensive free features.
Organizations run Kali Linux in virtualized environments alongside other operating systems, employing tools for automated scans, malware identification, infrastructure testing, and application development or hosting. These users benefit from lower maintenance requirements and a smaller footprint. The toolset includes Nmap, SQLMap, Metasploit, and Hydra, ensuring effective security assessments. Its high scalability, performance, user-friendly interface, and extensive documentation enhance the platform's usability. Known for stability, flexibility, and virus resistance, Kali Linux supports web security, troubleshooting, and configuration tasks comprehensively.
What are the most important features of Kali Linux?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Kali Linux can support industries in improving security through stable and flexible environments that resist viruses and provide extensive documentation. Users employ it for web security, troubleshooting, and configuring capabilities. Necessary improvements include automation, user-friendliness, and integrating AI and blockchain. Enhancements in security features, faster installations, and better learning tools are also essential. Machine learning integration and non-enterprise user functionalities can address current limitations.
Rocky Linux provides enterprise-grade stability and seamless Red Hat compatibility, coupled with extensive community support. Known for easy setup and minimal maintenance, its open-source nature ensures cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for critical systems.
Rocky Linux is an open-source operating system valued for its compatibility with Red Hat Enterprise Linux, making it an attractive choice for organizations migrating from CentOS. It focuses on stability, security, and long-term support, crucial for critical systems. Users benefit from seamless integration with automation tools and its strong community backing. While it offers ease of setup and package availability, areas like software availability and faster updates need enhancement. The system's UX design supports productivity, with potential improvements in documentation and security integration helping to maintain competitive advantages.
What Are the Key Features?Rocky Linux is widely implemented across numerous industries as a server platform and backend OS, supporting web hosting, big data projects, and cloud infrastructure. Companies in IT environments like Nutanix data centers and high-performance computing choose it for its compatibility with open-source tools, making it favored for automation with Ansible and monitoring through Prometheus.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.