We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and AuraQuantic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"It's stable."
"The product is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"Apache Airflow is useful for workflow automation, making it capable of automating pipelines, data pipelines, and data warehouse processes."
"Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"The user interface for monitoring and managing workflows has been excellent, particularly in the latest version. c"
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"UI can be improved with additional user-friendly features for non-programmers and for fewer coding practitioner requirements."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"We're currently using version 1.10, but I understand that there's a lot of improvements in version 2. In the earlier version that we're using, we sometimes have problems with maintenance complexity. Actually using Airflow is okay, but maintaining it has been difficult."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while AuraQuantic is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while AuraQuantic is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda and Bizagi. See our Apache Airflow vs. AuraQuantic report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.