Amazon QuickSight vs Posit comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Posit PBC are both solutions in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Posit PBC is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.7% mindshare in BIT, compared to Posit PBC’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 68% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Posit PBC users who would recommend it.

Amazon QuickSight

Read 34 Amazon QuickSight reviews

6,411 Views
4,488 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

Posit

Read 3 Posit reviews

645 Views
645 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Amazon QuickSight

Posit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Amazon QuickSight and Posit are analytics platforms, with Posit leading due to comprehensive features, while QuickSight stands out in cost efficiency and support.

Features: Amazon QuickSight offers scalability, AWS integration, and cloud-native tools, making it suitable for enterprises utilizing Amazon services. Posit provides advanced statistical analysis, visualization capabilities, and robust analytics features aimed at data scientists requiring sophisticated data manipulation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon QuickSight facilitates seamless deployment with cloud infrastructure and benefits from AWS’s vast support network. Posit offers both on-premise and cloud options, requiring more technical expertise yet provides responsive customer support to tackle deployment issues.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon QuickSight features a pay-per-session pricing model, reducing initial costs and maximizing ROI for smaller businesses. Posit demands a higher investment due to its complex feature set but is seen as valuable long-term. QuickSight's affordability and scalability contrast Posit's premium price with high productivity.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon QuickSight vs. Posit Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. Posit

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,954 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QuickSight

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Posit

Ranking in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

27th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the BI (Business Intelligence) Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon QuickSight is 3.7%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Posit is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon QuickSight	3.7%
Posit	0.7%
Other	95.6%

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ndip Takou

IT Infrastructure Support Specialist at Olam Agri

Can always access reports through intuitive dashboards that support diverse data connections

I can't specifically say how Amazon QuickSight could be improved since I focus more on using it and leveraging its functionalities. However, I could invest additional time to explore possible feedback from customers regarding their challenges. As cloud engineers, our capacity to improve is limited since AWS manages the services, but I would be open to feedback. I'm aware there are minor details that AWS could enhance, such as optimizing costs for beginners or small startups, which can be steep when trying to take Amazon QuickSight into production. Many have noticed that AWS services greatly benefit well-established companies, while startups struggle with costs as they transition data out of AWS. Understanding how AWS charges for Amazon QuickSight usage is critical for all users wanting to visualize their data effectively.

Read full review

SUBRATADEY

Principal Data Enigeneer at Oracle

Addressing installation challenges to utilize interactive dashboards effectively

Posit is valuable because many geo-scientists I work with are more comfortable writing R scripts and using R Shiny, making it a suited choice for them. On top of that, it integrates with the application and database, creating interactive dashboards. While there's a need to manage a significant portion manually, the performance overall is stable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Interactive dashboards do help with data analysis."

"The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there."

"The solution is simple to implement."

"Compared to other reporting tools, it is very effective but does require an understanding of certain concepts in QuickSight. This understanding is crucial for creating dimensions, changing metrics, and visualizing reports."

"A valuable feature of Amazon QuickSight is that it's a cloud-native service provided by AWS. As all platforms within my company run on AWS, that's the leverage of Amazon QuickSight. Amazon QuickSight is also easy to use, and I find the native connectors from AWS valuable as well."

"Easily able to connect with our other services and easy to manage."

"The most valuable feature I have found is the low-level securities are very easy to use."

"QuickSight is a great savior in terms of row level security, providing almost equivalent value to Tableau and Power BI."

More Amazon QuickSight pros

"Overall, I think Posit is a stable product."

"The most valuable feature of Posit is that it allows users to host different models in one place, making it easy to share with colleagues and teammates."

"I have found Posit’s integration with R, such as the autocomplete feature and the help panel, to be invaluable."

Cons

"The setup process falls somewhere in the middle. It is not straightforward, nor is it complex, but there is a significant amount of work needed on the back end to make it function."

"The product has some storage and SPICE data issues."

"You can't tell a data story as well in QuickSight as you can on others, especially in TIBCO Spotfire."

"Compared to Power BI, I felt QuickSight lacks some features, like delayed drill-downs. Drill-downs were the main area where we found QuickSight lacking."

"The cost of queries is very high."

"QuickSight needs to add more visuals similar to what Power BI offers."

"Lacked connectivity with other third-party tools and data sources."

"The product is quite expensive because the price is too close to QlikView's prices but it does not ring as well as QlikView."

More Amazon QuickSight cons

"Posit lacks a smooth solution for the build and release pipeline, requiring duplicate effort for production transitions."

"I would like to see improvements in SSH capabilities."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is simpler and cheaper than other solutions."

"A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."

"The Amazon QuickSight licensing model my company's on is pay-as-you-go, but I wouldn't be able to give the figures because that's handled by the finance department."

"The product pricing is better than other vendors."

"I wouldn't say that it is an expensive product, but to stay competitive they would need to bring down the prices."

"Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments."

"The solution is not affordable."

"The standard edition is free to use for exploration purposes while the enterprise edition needs to be paid for. The pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

More Amazon QuickSight pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QuickSight?

The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QuickSight?

Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QuickSight?

I don't want to hypothetically say about the effectiveness of Amazon QuickSight in terms of machine learning, so I need to pass on that. At the moment, on the cloud perspective, we have Amazon majo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Posit?

I use Posit for both Posit Connect and Posit Workbench. The Workbench is used for development, as there are many packages not supported by RStudio because I didn't have RStudio Pro. Posit Connect i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Posit?

RStudio Pro and Workbench are quite expensive. Workbench is especially costly because it supports multiple sessions, so there's a strategy to use it only during full-phase development, then switch ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Posit?

Posit lacks a smooth solution for the build and release pipeline. Its documentation is weak, which can make installation cumbersome for someone without terminal experience. Additionally, there are ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 48% of the time

Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 10% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 9% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 4% of the time

QlikView vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon QuickSight Competitors

Tableau Enterprise vs Posit

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Posit

Compared 33% of the time

Domo vs Posit

Compared 18% of the time

Hex vs Posit

Compared 16% of the time

More Posit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight

January 2026

Download Amazon QuickSight product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

January 2026

Download Posit product report

Also Known As

QuickSight

No data available

Overview

Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Posit offers data analysis and visualization tools designed to enhance decision-making through actionable insights. It supports diverse programming environments and integrates seamlessly, facilitating efficient data processes for teams in analytics-driven sectors.

Posit elevates analytical operations by providing powerful tools for data management and visualization. Its adaptive nature enables integration with several programming languages, catering to the needs of data professionals seeking adaptable and efficient solutions. Its architecture is robust, fostering seamless collaboration across analytical platforms. While it enhances data workflows, user reviews often hint at the need for advanced analytic capabilities to enhance unique data interrogation methods, which remains an area for enhancement.

What are the valuable features of Posit?

Data Integration: Provides seamless connection with programming environments, optimizing processes.
Visualization Tools: Offers a variety of graphical representations for data clarity.
Collaboration Support: Enables effective teamwork through accessible shared features.
Scalability: Adapts to the growing needs of data environments without losing performance.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines data processes, saving time and enhancing productivity.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers powerful capabilities with a focus on reducing operational expenses.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Provides insights that lead to better business outcomes.
User Adoption: High acceptance rates due to intuitive design elements that simplify operations.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Posit finds applications in creating dashboards that track and analyze performance data, aiding in strategic planning. Educational institutions use Posit to introduce data science concepts, offering students hands-on experience with data analytics tools.

Posit PBC

Sample Customers

MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight vs. Posit

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon QuickSight vs. Posit

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon QuickSight vs. Posit and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,954 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon QuickSight vs. Posit report.

See our list of best BI (Business Intelligence) Tools vendors.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.