Amazon EKS vs Google Container Engine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
9,816 views|7,645 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Google Logo
115 views|88 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Google Container Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool works well with the nodes in AWS. It's scalability is also good in terms of architecture.""Amazon EKS is very scalable.""The solution is easy to use.""AWS cloud services are flexible and have thorough documentation. AWS also has data centers all over the world.""The product helps us to configure the new environment.""It's a faster solution to adopt on native applications.""The most valuable feature is the cluster engine.""I like its auto-scale feature very much."

More Amazon EKS Pros →

"The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs."

More Google Container Engine Pros →

Cons
"Amazon EKS should improve its integration.""The goal and idea behind microservices are to always be available and capable of handling any load, no matter how many requests come through...All of these services are great, but I also think it would be useful to have the same technology available in a miniature resource size, enabling the same applications and services to run on a small machine.""It is very cumbersome to assign permissions to users to interact with a cluster.""They need to work on the Amazon plugins on the Kubernetes cluster.""The dashboard needs to be more user-friendly.""I would like to see the user interface improved because it is hard to find and not straightforward.""Amazon EKS's vulnerability management of data could be improved.""I believe the initial setup could be a better experience and faster customer support."

More Amazon EKS Cons →

"Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products."

More Google Container Engine Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is more expensive than other competitors and does not require a license."
  • "Cloud based pay-as-you-go pricing"
  • "My company paid for the license."
  • "Pricing is dependent upon instance type."
  • "The solution is quite costly and developers will start exploring other solutions or moving their workloads to other clouds if costs aren't reduced."
  • "The price could be cheaper. I would rate it as seven out of ten."
  • "Amazon EKS has fair pricing. It's better in terms of pricing than other platforms."
  • "I would like a cheaper version of it."
  • More Amazon EKS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's most valuable features are scalability, observability, and performance.
    Top Answer:The product pricing depends on the specific requirements. For instance, clients between $3000-$4000 per month might find the pricing reasonable, with clusters priced around $70 to $80 plus additional… more »
    Top Answer:They could add logging features. At present, we use external tools to increase and decrease the number of instances.
    Top Answer:The tool is very powerful, scalable, and easy to manage. Its autoscaling features helped us save costs.
    Top Answer:Google Container Engine needs to be able to manage network products.
    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    9,816
    Comparisons
    7,645
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    356
    Rating
    8.5
    14th
    Views
    115
    Comparisons
    88
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    211
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a fully managed Kubernetes service. Customers such as Intel, Snap, Intuit, GoDaddy, and Autodesk trust EKS to run their most sensitive and mission critical applications because of its security, reliability, and scalability.

    EKS is the best place to run Kubernetes for several reasons. First, you can choose to run your EKS clusters using AWS Fargate, which is serverless compute for containers. Fargate removes the need to provision and manage servers, lets you specify and pay for resources per application, and improves security through application isolation by design. Second, EKS is deeply integrated with services such as Amazon CloudWatch, Auto Scaling Groups, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), and Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), providing you a seamless experience to monitor, scale, and load-balance your applications. Third, EKS integrates with AWS App Mesh and provides a Kubernetes native experience to consume service mesh features and bring rich observability, traffic controls and security features to applications. Additionally, EKS provides a scalable and highly-available control plane that runs across multiple availability zones to eliminate a single point of failure.
    EKS runs upstream Kubernetes and is certified Kubernetes conformant so you can leverage all benefits of open source tooling from the community. You can also easily migrate any standard Kubernetes application to EKS without needing to refactor your code.

    Google Container Engine is a powerful cluster manager and orchestration system for running your Docker containers. Container Engine schedules your containers into the cluster and manages them automatically based on requirements you define (such as CPU and memory). It's built on the open source Kubernetes system, giving you the flexibility to take advantage of on-premises, hybrid, or public cloud infrastructure.

    Sample Customers
    GoDaddy, Pearson, FICO, Intuit, Verizon, Honeywell, Logicworks, RetailMeNot, LogMeIn, Conde Nast, mercari, Trainline, Axway
    Tock
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Container Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EKS is ranked 2nd in Container Management with 38 reviews while Google Container Engine is ranked 14th in Container Management with 1 review. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Google Container Engine is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "An easily downloadable solution that enables containerization without relying on cloud infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Container Engine writes "Has autoscaling features that helps to save costs ". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and Linode, whereas Google Container Engine is most compared with .

    See our list of best Container Management vendors.

    We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.