Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Koofr comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Koofr are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while Koofr is ranked #54. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.2% mindshare in CS, compared to Koofr’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution.

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Read 18 Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) reviews

7,659 Views
1,532 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Koofr

285 Views
285 Comparison Views

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Koofr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Koofr based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Google, CTERA and others in Cloud Storage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Ranking in Cloud Storage

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (13th)

Koofr

Ranking in Cloud Storage

54th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is 3.2%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Koofr is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)	3.2%
Koofr	0.6%
Other	96.2%

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

Parveen Garg

Subject Matter Expert at Bureau veritas

Utilizing network data sharing effectively with cost considerations

What should be improved in Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is the costing, as it should be reduced, but that depends on Amazon. To be frank, I don't have much comparison as we don't have a good volume. We have very little volume on the EFS (Elastic File System), which is why I couldn't do much cost comparison. Currently, I'm not aware of the exact costing, but previously I found that the costing was a bit high.

Read full review

Use Koofr?

Leave a review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

We don't need to purchase it; we are just using it and paying Amazon as per the utilization. We make direct payments to Amazon based on our usage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

When I started working with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), I faced a few issues. One issue was around the number of IOPS limitation. Initially, the number of IOPS that could be performed on the ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 68% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 2% of the time

Dell PowerScale vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 2% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 2% of the time

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

June 2026

Download Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

June 2026

Download Koofr product report

Overview

Amazon EFS provides elastic file storage in the cloud, offering unlimited storage and seamless integration with AWS services for dynamic workloads.

Amazon EFS serves as a scalable, shareable file storage across Linux servers, seamlessly integrating with AWS for data-intensive applications. Its auto-scaling capability handles shifting data demands in real time, ensuring cost-effective storage management. Offering high availability and support for NFS version 4, Amazon EFS optimizes performance and data integrity for cloud and serverless environments. While its strengths lie in scalability and Linux support, further enhancements in cost transparency, Windows compatibility, and deployment simplicity can broaden its applicability.

What are the key features of Amazon EFS?

Flexible Scaling: Automatically adjusts storage capacity to meet dynamic workload demands.
Usage-based Pricing: Only charges for storage used, optimizing cost efficiency.
Integration with AWS: Seamlessly connects with services like EC2 for enhanced application support.
Auto-scaling: Efficiently allocates resources for fluctuating data needs.
Shared Access: Facilitates collaborative data use across various applications.

What benefits should users expect from Amazon EFS reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined configuration and easy scaling of resources.
Cost Management: Reduced storage expenses through usage-based pricing.
Reliable Performance: Consistent data availability and stable system operations.
Improved Data Management: Simplified processes for handling extensive datasets.
Integration Capabilities: Smooth interoperability with AWS services enhances functionality.

Amazon EFS is widely implemented in industries needing robust cloud-based storage solutions, facilitating scalable storage for applications like web serving, content management, and data analytics. Its compatibility with EC2 and Linux optimizes resource management, supporting complex access needs and enhancing operational efficiency in technology-focused sectors.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Koofr is a reliable cloud storage solution for securely backing up files, sharing documents, syncing data across devices, and collaborating on projects.

It offers encryption features for added security and seamless media file management. Users appreciate its user-friendly interface and ample free storage space for enhanced productivity and organization.

Koofr

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend

1. Atlassian. 2. Bitbucket 3. CERN 4. Codeship 5. DigitalOcean 6. GitHub 7. Google 8. IBM 9. Intel 10. JetBrains11. LinkedIn 12. Lyft 13. Microsoft 14. Mozilla 15. Netflix 16. Pinterest 17. Qualcomm 18. SAP 19. Spotify 20. Square 21. Stripe 22. Tesla 23. Twitter 24. Uber 25. VMware 26. WeWork 27. Xero 28. Zoom

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Google, CTERA and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.