Amazon Aurora Serverless vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.3% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Read 3 Amazon Aurora Serverless reviews

95 Views
41 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 20 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

223 Views
158 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and Amazon Aurora Serverless compete in the cloud database solutions category. Amazon Aurora Serverless appears to have the upper hand with its advanced features catering to value-focused buyers.

Features: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service provides comprehensive security, automated backups, and seamless integration with other Oracle products. Amazon Aurora Serverless offers scalability, automatic scaling capabilities, and compatibility with multiple database engines, focusing on flexibility and efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is recognized for its straightforward deployment and strong integration within Oracle's ecosystem. Its customer service is effective. Amazon Aurora Serverless has a serverless architecture allowing automatic scaling with minimal manual intervention and well-regarded customer support ensuring smooth deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is competitive in initial setup costs, providing reliable ROI through its integrated offerings and support. Amazon Aurora Serverless has higher upfront costs for advanced functionality but delivers better long-term ROI with flexible usage-based pricing and reduced resource management costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora Serverless is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Anibal Palacios

CTO at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Database availability has improved with quick recovery and enhanced network setup

I use Aurora mainly for creating and maintaining databases, such as Aurora (MySQL version) databases, within the system. I value it for its network security and quicker recovery options Aurora is used as it is an easier solution for our requirements and offers high availability. It allows us to…

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Aurora Serverless is easy to scale, offering a cluster-based shared scaling model with options for Autoscale."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora Serverless is its serverless nature, which means I do not have to maintain the underlying infrastructure."

"Aurora could improve its affordability, even though its price is very completive compared to DBs as SLQ Server."

"Overall, I rate Oracle MySQL Cloud Service as a nine out of ten."

"The stability of the solution is very good. I wouldn't have used it for the past seven years if I was not satisfied."

"The solution overall is very, very good. It's got good integration with other databases and adds new features often."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"MySQL is a centralized RDBMS in itself, and you don't have the overkill of having the full Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server. It's ideal, and it helps with the developer console. It has three versions for developers. It's a very good tool for open source."

"The product is easy to learn."

"It is an established open-source database with a vast array of resources available, ensuring you can learn everything needed."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is flexible and is an open-source product."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"Aurora could improve its affordability, as it is currently considered a bit expensive."

"Amazon Aurora Serverless could benefit from a few more security features, particularly in terms of its accessibility."

"Amazon Aurora could improve its detailed monitoring, especially in CloudWatch, to provide more precise query level insights."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"The support is not that great. They're not really supporting directly anymore and relying on experts to figure out technical issues."

"The solution should offer memory management."

"There could be more courses where the people could learn more easily how to use the tool."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"The product has many bugs."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is expensive."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora Serverless?

In my experience, Aurora is a bit expensive. The costs depend on the size of the database.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Aurora could improve its affordability, as it is currently considered a bit expensive. There is room to make it more cost-effective for users even though its price is very completive compared to DB...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Aurora Serverless?

I use Aurora mainly for creating and maintaining databases, such as Aurora (MySQL version) databases, within the system. I value it for its network security and quicker recovery options.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 57% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 43% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

March 2025

Download Amazon Aurora Serverless product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora Serverless is a flexible, on-demand database service that automatically scales based on application needs. It removes the need for database management, allowing businesses to focus on innovation and efficiency.

This database service provides automatic rescaling of compute capacity, which makes it uniquely suited to unpredictable workloads and applications with variable demand. It integrates seamlessly with existing AWS services and supports both MySQL and PostgreSQL, ensuring high availability and durability while reducing costs associated with over-provisioning of resources. Aurora Serverless dynamically adjusts capacity, providing a cost-effective and reliable solution for cloud-native applications and serverless architectures.

What are the key features of Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Automatic Scaling: Instantly adjusts capacity in response to demand.
Managed Infrastructure: Offloads database maintenance and management tasks.
High Availability: Provides multi-AZ support to ensure uptime and reliability.
MySQL and PostgreSQL Compatibility: Supports migrations and existing applications.
Pay-Per-Use: Charges are based on the exact resources utilized.

What benefits can be found in reviews of Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Cost Savings: Helps significantly reduce infrastructure expenses.
Operational Efficiency: Frees up time for the IT team for strategic projects.
Scalability: Easily accommodates fluctuating application demands.
Integration: Works seamlessly with AWS services, enhancing service reach.
Resiliency: Robust data protection features contribute to data security.

Amazon Aurora Serverless has been widely adopted across industries such as ecommerce and online media, where demand can vary greatly and unpredictably. For instance, ecommerce platforms benefit from auto-scaling during peak shopping seasons, ensuring uninterrupted service without incurring unnecessary costs during off-peak periods. Similarly, media companies leverage its auto-scaling capabilities to manage traffic spikes during events or breaking news.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.