Amazon Aurora Serverless vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0, while Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.6. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Read 3 Amazon Aurora Serverless reviews

199 Views
193 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 21 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

484 Views
247 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and Amazon Aurora Serverless compete in the cloud database solutions category. Amazon Aurora Serverless appears to have the upper hand with its advanced features catering to value-focused buyers.

Features: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service provides comprehensive security, automated backups, and seamless integration with other Oracle products. Amazon Aurora Serverless offers scalability, automatic scaling capabilities, and compatibility with multiple database engines, focusing on flexibility and efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is recognized for its straightforward deployment and strong integration within Oracle's ecosystem. Its customer service is effective. Amazon Aurora Serverless has a serverless architecture allowing automatic scaling with minimal manual intervention and well-regarded customer support ensuring smooth deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is competitive in initial setup costs, providing reliable ROI through its integrated offerings and support. Amazon Aurora Serverless has higher upfront costs for advanced functionality but delivers better long-term ROI with flexible usage-based pricing and reduced resource management costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Aurora Serverless

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Amazon Aurora Serverless is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Oracle MySQL Cloud Service	0.5%
Amazon Aurora Serverless	0.4%
Other	99.1%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

MohitGupta3

Cloud Infrastructure Architect - AWS at Infopro Digital

Seamless growth management through serverless efficiency and reasonable pricing

The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora Serverless is its serverless nature, which means I do not have to maintain the underlying infrastructure. Additionally, it is highly scalable, and its pricing model is favorable. Aurora's automatic scaling greatly enhances our operational efficiency by eliminating the need to set specific thresholds and preventing client data access issues due to uneven growth. Its serverless setup allows us to manage costs effectively. Other notable features include direct integration with tools like SFTP Go for media file uploads, automatic backups ensuring data recovery, and its scalability in terms of handling growing database demands.

Read full review

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Aurora Serverless is easy to scale, offering a cluster-based shared scaling model with options for Autoscale."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Aurora Serverless is its serverless nature, which means I do not have to maintain the underlying infrastructure."

"Aurora could improve its affordability, even though its price is very completive compared to DBs as SLQ Server."

"The most valuable feature is the data aggregation function."

"The solution's performance is good."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is data migration."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"The access to a suite of management and administration tools that simplify tasks such as database provisioning, configuration, and monitoring."

"The product is good for tuning."

"The product is easy to learn."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

Cons

"Aurora could improve its affordability, as it is currently considered a bit expensive."

"Amazon Aurora Serverless could benefit from a few more security features, particularly in terms of its accessibility."

"Amazon Aurora could improve its detailed monitoring, especially in CloudWatch, to provide more precise query level insights."

"The user interface is not simple."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"There could be improvements, particularly in Firebird, where the indexing is limited to just a single B-tree index, leading to poor performance for large-scale queries."

"The technical support is in need of improvement."

"The product has many bugs."

"Sometimes, we face syntax issues with the solution."

"The solution should offer memory management."

"In a production environment, upgrading from a lower to an upper version is a very long process that needs to be improved."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"The product is expensive."

"It is an open-source product."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Aurora Serverless?

In my experience, Aurora is a bit expensive. The costs depend on the size of the database.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Aurora could improve its affordability, as it is currently considered a bit expensive. There is room to make it more cost-effective for users even though its price is very completive compared to DB...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Aurora Serverless?

I use Aurora mainly for creating and maintaining databases, such as Aurora (MySQL version) databases, within the system. I value it for its network security and quicker recovery options.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Citus Data vs Amazon Aurora Serverless

Compared 100% of the time

More Amazon Aurora Serverless Competitors

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 40% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 30% of the time

Amazon Aurora vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 30% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

August 2025

Download Amazon Aurora Serverless product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

August 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Overview

Amazon Aurora Serverless is a flexible, on-demand database service that automatically scales based on application needs. It removes the need for database management, allowing businesses to focus on innovation and efficiency.

This database service provides automatic rescaling of compute capacity, which makes it uniquely suited to unpredictable workloads and applications with variable demand. It integrates seamlessly with existing AWS services and supports both MySQL and PostgreSQL, ensuring high availability and durability while reducing costs associated with over-provisioning of resources. Aurora Serverless dynamically adjusts capacity, providing a cost-effective and reliable solution for cloud-native applications and serverless architectures.

What are the key features of Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Automatic Scaling: Instantly adjusts capacity in response to demand.
Managed Infrastructure: Offloads database maintenance and management tasks.
High Availability: Provides multi-AZ support to ensure uptime and reliability.
MySQL and PostgreSQL Compatibility: Supports migrations and existing applications.
Pay-Per-Use: Charges are based on the exact resources utilized.

What benefits can be found in reviews of Amazon Aurora Serverless?

Cost Savings: Helps significantly reduce infrastructure expenses.
Operational Efficiency: Frees up time for the IT team for strategic projects.
Scalability: Easily accommodates fluctuating application demands.
Integration: Works seamlessly with AWS services, enhancing service reach.
Resiliency: Robust data protection features contribute to data security.

Amazon Aurora Serverless has been widely adopted across industries such as ecommerce and online media, where demand can vary greatly and unpredictably. For instance, ecommerce platforms benefit from auto-scaling during peak shopping seasons, ensuring uninterrupted service without incurring unnecessary costs during off-peak periods. Similarly, media companies leverage its auto-scaling capabilities to manage traffic spikes during events or breaking news.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

September 2025

Free Report: Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Aurora Serverless vs. Oracle MySQL Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.