Informatica PowerExchange and Alteryx Designer compete in the data transformation and integration category. Informatica PowerExchange seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive integration capabilities, particularly in real-time features and scalability.
Features: Informatica PowerExchange is known for its robust data transformation and integration capabilities, especially its real-time features, scalability, and seamless integration with legacy systems. Its change data capture functionality is a highlight, offering effective real-time data management. Alteryx Designer offers a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, powerful data preparation, and analytics capabilities. It focuses on making data transformation accessible for non-technical users, offering automation tools suitable for a range of tasks.
Room for Improvement: Informatica PowerExchange users suggest enhancements in real-time capabilities, improved support for Oracle database features, and better cloud support. Simplified installation processes and pricing are also cited as areas of improvement. Alteryx Designer users point out its high cost, the need for more database connectors, and advanced reporting functionalities. Improvements in integration and technical support response are also desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both tools are predominantly deployed on-premises, with cloud deployment options. Informatica PowerExchange is generally commended for its reliability and comprehensive knowledge base, although support can vary. Alteryx Designer is praised for its straightforward deployment, but users note slow customer support response times as an issue.
Pricing and ROI: Both Informatica PowerExchange and Alteryx Designer are considered expensive with pricing models that can lead to significant costs based on usage. Informatica's pricing is capacity-based, requiring additional licenses for scaling. Alteryx's costs increase notably with feature integration and scaling, leading to user frustrations. Despite the costs, both tools are recognized for delivering significant ROI, enhancing decision-making, and streamlining processes, although the return might not always be immediate.
It is considered cost-efficient because it leads to the re-utilization of channels and platforms, which saves time and money.
There are areas where they need to improve response time and overall competence.
Their support aligns with what I have experienced with Informatica data quality teams, and it is quite effective.
Informatica's technical support team is very supportive and provides help whenever required.
The support was good enough, and they were able to resolve all the issues I raised in the past.
Technical errors sometimes occur, such as network breakages at the source level, which breaks connectivity.
One area that could be improved is performance, as PowerExchange sometimes has less performance compared to native connectors when dealing with a huge volume of data.
The addition of data quality dashboards or measures would also help in profiling data to assess its health before sharing or moving it.
It's cheaper than Palantir, but even Alteryx is too much for small clients.
Informatica PowerExchange is considered cost-efficient due to reduced number of APIs needed.
The pricing and cost depend heavily on SAP's licensing structure, especially if using SAP integration services.
The main valuable aspect is the simplicity of use across all features.
It also reduces the number of APIs needed for new integrations by offering a unified exchange platform.
The primary advantage of Informatica PowerExchange is being able to extract data from source systems that Informatica does not natively support.
PowerExchange is one of the best software solutions to build integrations with non-Oracle or standard database services, especially for SAP and Hana products.
Informatica PowerExchange Connectors provides high performance, out-of-the-box connectivity without having to develop custom data access programs.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
