Alluvio AppResponse vs Statseeker comparison

Riverbed and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Riverbed is ranked #58 with an average rating of 8.0, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. Riverbed holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Alluvio AppResponse

Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews

624 Views
379 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

416 Views
252 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Alluvio AppResponse

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Statseeker compete in network performance management. Alluvio leads with superior data analytics, whereas Statseeker excels with its advanced alerting features.

Features: Alluvio AppResponse provides comprehensive traffic analysis, packet capture, and advanced troubleshooting analytics. Statseeker offers real-time monitoring, sophisticated alerting systems, and a lightweight architecture for efficient trend analysis.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio AppResponse can enhance ease of setup, streamline user interface complexity, and expand its real-time operational insights. Statseeker could benefit from more comprehensive data analytics, deeper packet analysis capabilities, and enhanced troubleshooting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker supports rapid deployment with minimal configuration and is known for effective customer service. Alluvio AppResponse, requiring a more comprehensive setup, offers strong support but takes longer to operationalize due to its extensive feature set.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio AppResponse has a higher setup cost justified by its analytics, offering long-term ROI. Statseeker presents a competitive pricing structure and immediate ROI through efficient monitoring. The choice depends on prioritizing cost-effectiveness or analytical depth, with Statseeker being budget-friendly and Alluvio focusing on detailed analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

58th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (48th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic

Network and Security Unit Manager at Bankalararası Kart Merkezi (BKM)

It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels

I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.

Read full review

Jessie Hackney

Network Engineer at West Virginia Department of Education

Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise

The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."

"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."

"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."

"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."

"Riverbed's product is a superb product."

"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."

"We really like the scalability capabilities."

"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."

More Alluvio AppResponse pros

"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."

"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."

"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."

"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."

"We are a smaller enterprise, but we're watching approximately fifteen-thousand switchboards with no problem at all."

"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."

"In terms of network visibility, Statseeker can be very granular. We can tell it exactly where we want it to go and where we want it to check, or it can do an SNMP walk and find out where everything is. It's very detailed."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"Technical support needs to be more responsive."

"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."

"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."

"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."

"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

More Alluvio AppResponse cons

"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."

"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."

"We haven't seen an ROI."

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."

"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."

"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."

"I'd say the interface could improve a little bit. I find with new users, I tend to have to spend a bit of time walking them through how to use the interface. It could be a little more user friendly."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 22% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 22% of the time

Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 19% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 19% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 17% of the time

More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 54% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 46% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Download Alluvio AppResponse product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

April 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert

No data available

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.