Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor comparison

Riverbed and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Riverbed is ranked #56 with an average rating of 8.0, while SolarWinds is ranked #30 with an average rating of 7.8. Riverbed holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 1,209 Views
  • 762 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
SolarWinds Network Device M...
Read 23 SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reviews
  • 835 Views
  • 802 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and SolarWinds Network Device Monitor are competing in the network monitoring category. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set, despite higher costs.

Features: Alluvio AppResponse provides high-speed data capture, real-time application analytics, and comprehensive reporting for effective performance monitoring. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor offers robust device health monitoring, network path analysis, and automated network mapping, enhancing network management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio AppResponse could enhance its advanced feature sets and expand integration options. It may also benefit from improving scalability for large enterprises. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could improve its initial implementation costs, reduce complexity in its user interface, and offer more personalized support options to match its comprehensive features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alluvio AppResponse offers a streamlined deployment process with responsive customer support, ideal for users requiring guidance. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor emphasizes a straightforward installation process with self-service resources, suiting technically proficient teams.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio AppResponse is noted for its competitive setup costs, offering favorable ROI through performance insights. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor has higher upfront costs, justified by its feature-rich environment leading to long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
56th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (49th)
SolarWinds Network Device M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
30th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor0.6%
Alluvio AppResponse0.5%
Other98.9%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels
I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.
Read full review
Vijay Samant - PeerSpot reviewer
Monitor network utilization and manage bandwidth efficiently with live monitoring and reliable fault management capabilities
I use SolarWinds Network Device Monitor for monitoring network utilization, bandwidth utilization, uptime, and downtime. It also assists in incident management SolarWinds Network Device Monitor provides live monitoring capabilities, which are very useful. Its fault management capabilities are…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."
"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."
"Riverbed's product is a superb product."
"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."
"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."
"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"The product is useful for switches and IP phones."
"I rate the product's initial setup process a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is a difficult phase and ten is an easy process."
"There are vital features of auto-plugin core ports"
"The solution and its interface are elaborate and fully integrate all monitored items for easy analysis and troubleshooting."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable features of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor are the reports. We are configuring the reports, and the first reports are only about the devices. We are configuring the thresholds in order to monitor all the devices."
"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is it shows you the utilization of devices to allow you to take proactive action before something goes down or reaches the saturation point. You can take proactive action to fix the problem before it occurs."
"The alerting functionality in SolarWinds Network Device Monitor helps us stay informed during off-hours by sending alerts if our main links or devices are impacted, allowing us to quickly address any issues."
More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pros
 

Cons

"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."
"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."
"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"Although I haven't explored all of the features available, I wouldn't mind if the software were made to be a bit more customizable."
"When an organization's network grows, the complexity of the dashboard becomes an area of concern where improvements are required."
"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could improve by being more user-friendly. The network has so many features which make it difficult to find how to configure how to use it. It is not simple to customize."
"It would be beneficial if SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could provide a feature to monitor CRC errors specifically on individual interfaces rather than the entire device. This would help in detecting intermittent issues and packet drops on main links more accurately, especially when there are CRC errors. It's important for us to be aware of these issues to avoid any voice quality problems or interruptions on our MTS links."
"SolarWinds Network Device Monitor lacks the granularity of other monitoring tools like LiveNX."
"If everything were in the package so that everything was ready to go out of the box, that would be ideal."
"The security needs improvement, which is why we are moving away from Solar Winds. We have security concerns."
"The initial setup of the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor could be easier. It took us approximately one month to complete the implementation."
More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"The price of the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is good."
"I find the cost of SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reasonable for our company. Though, I'm not aware of the exact licensing cost."
"The product is expensive."
"When compared with other solutions SolarWinds is more expensive."
"The enterprise license is good for the SolarWinds Network Device Monitor. However, it is expensive, they should reduce their price."
"Well, we had a perpetual license and the renewal was $20 to $25,000."
"Thankfully, it doesn't take a lot of manpower to install and deploy."
"I rate the product's price as three to three and a half or on a scale of one to ten, where one means low price, and ten means high price."
More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Performing Arts
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
What do you like most about SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?
I rate the product's initial setup process a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one means it is a difficult phase and ten is an easy process.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?
I am not a positive person regarding SolarWinds Network Device Monitor.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SolarWinds Network Device Monitor?
There are solutions that can perform better, but due to pricing for our corporate implementation, we had to stay with this solution. It accomplishes the necessary tasks, but there is room for impro...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 20% of the time
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 12% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 12% of the time
Pico Corvil Analytics vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Pico Corvil Analytics vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 11% of the time
OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 9% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
ScienceLogic vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
Compared 25% of the time
FortiMonitor vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Logo
FortiMonitor vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
Compared 16% of the time
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
Compared 15% of the time
ThousandEyes vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
Compared 9% of the time
Checkmk vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Logo
Checkmk vs SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
Compared 8% of the time
More SolarWinds Network Device Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
September 2025
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
September 2025
SolarWinds Network Device Monitor reportDownload SolarWinds Network Device Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
Network Device Monitor
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed
Network Device Monitor is a free tool that makes it easy to monitor the real-time performance and health of a single device on your network with a desktop dashboard that alerts you when your device is in trouble.
SolarWinds
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
Air Rarotonga
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
September 2025
Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.