We performed a comparison between Allot IoTSecure and Forescout Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security."The most valuable feature of Allot IoTSecure is bandwidth optimization."
"Being able to sort on device types or devices with open ports is helpful when narrowing down assets of possible misconfigured devices that may be vulnerable on the network. We can take action on those devices based off of corporate policy."
"It has helped with improving our security posture in terms of controlling the access of rogue devices into our network through identification. We have been able to prevent rogue device activities on the network, check the health of the system, and ensure remediation."
"You can quickly filter your view of devices and zero in on the ones you want using a variety of tools, such as what subnet it is on or what it has been classified as."
"We think it's simple. We think it's very useful and we really like reports and everything."
"We use the Forescout Platform for device visibility and control in our network. It's very helpful for tracking malicious or unusual activity. We use it to track which ports are open, which machines are running specific services, and to identify vulnerabilities. For example, there was a vulnerability related to SMB, and we could use the product to determine which machines inside our organization were allowing SMB traffic."
"The most valuable features of the Forescout Platform are NAC for sharing, Network Access Control, and port sharing of the devices."
"The stability is amazing for the Forescout Platform. We have been using Forescout for four years, and no one complained about the stability."
"The most valuable features of the Forescout Platform are ease of management and outstanding visibility. The visibility is simple to obtain."
"Allot IoTSecure could improve by providing better documentation, there was not any documentation on their website."
"I should be able to integrate my Forescout with any other third party security technology, to build that connected security strategy."
"It's scalable, but not without a big investment. It doesn't do so well at the branch. At the home office, it does okay and not so well at the branch."
"Other solutions have TACACS+, but Forescout does not. In the next release, I would like to see Forescout have accounting."
"Forescout Platform's technical support is slow to respond and could be more knowledgeable."
"Forescout Platform isn't flexible with connections to devices like printers and forces you to re-enter details like the MAC address after any breakdowns."
"The solution could always improve by adding more features to make it more robust."
"In the next release of the solution, it could benefit from being more flexible to allow for more freedom."
"Forescout Platform needs to improve how the device works in preventing rogue servers."
Allot IoTSecure is ranked 9th in IoT Security with 1 review while Forescout Platform is ranked 1st in IoT Security with 69 reviews. Allot IoTSecure is rated 6.0, while Forescout Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Allot IoTSecure writes "Useful bandwidth optimization, reliable, but difficult to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". Allot IoTSecure is most compared with Palo Alto Networks IoT Security, whereas Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Armis.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.
We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
