We performed a comparison between Akamai Kona Site Defender and Signal Sciences based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
Earn 20 points
Signal Sciences' next-gen web application firewall (WAF) and runtime application self protection (RASP) increase security and maintain reliability without sacrificing velocity - all at the lowest total cost of ownership.
Akamai Kona Site Defender is ranked 12th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews while Signal Sciences is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Akamai Kona Site Defender is rated 8.0, while Signal Sciences is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Akamai Kona Site Defender writes "Great technical support, scales extremely well, and is very stable". On the other hand, Akamai Kona Site Defender is most compared with AWS WAF, Akamai Prolexic Routed, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Cloudflare, whereas Signal Sciences is most compared with AWS WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Wallarm NG WAF and Cloudflare.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.