Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Akamai App and API Protector vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] comparison

Akamai and TransUnion are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TransUnion users who would recommend it.
Akamai App and API Protector
Read 28 Akamai App and API Protector reviews
  • 1,691 Views
  • 1,034 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Neustar UltraDDoS EOL and Akamai App and API Protector compete in mitigating DDoS attacks and safeguarding applications. Akamai is superior due to its advanced features, offering a more comprehensive solution despite higher pricing.

Features: Neustar UltraDDoS EOL offers comprehensive DDoS protection, network visibility, and rapid response times. Akamai App and API Protector provides advanced application security, API-specific protection, and bot management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Neustar UltraDDoS EOL features a straightforward deployment process and strong technical support. Akamai App and API Protector requires more initial configuration but offers detailed documentation and responsive service for easier long-term management.

Pricing and ROI: Neustar UltraDDoS EOL is attractive for its lower initial costs and competitive ROI. Akamai App and API Protector has a higher upfront cost, but its advanced security capabilities deliver substantial long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Akamai App and API Protector
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Web Application Firewall (WAF) (8th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (4th), Cloud and Data Center Security (10th)
Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Deepesh Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Bot Manager and different features to manage threats
As a product, it has good capabilities, including professional support. However, it's risky for us to rely on AI for real-time traffic management. We use in-house analytics but avoid automatic actions due to their high impact. For example, I live in a developing country. Everyone has different types of phones, apps, and everything else. So, if someone is using a legacy phone, that is still a use case here. If AI decides that this is an end-of-life phone or end-of-life Android operating system, it starts blocking that traffic. We may potentially lose millions or probably thousands and hundreds of thousands of hits per second. Everything is all about how well we serve payments because we're into payments. So, AI is used for analytics but not for real-time decisions. We can't afford to block traffic based on AI models due to the variety of devices and operating systems our users have.
Read full review
JT
Identifies a request that comes up multiple times, block holds that particular IP, and lets the genuine traffic pass through
Genuine traffic coming in is still getting better. While I understand that it's some sort of algorithm that is written in this scale, that algorithm can be a little bit better because sometimes while we are doing DDoS mitigation, genuine traffic does get blocked. While it is one of the greatest features it can still be improved. I would like to see a dashboard that shows you the data that is transferred from which end. It's where people start looking at abuse management. People keep questioning when the mitigation is on what service it is and how many GBs are passing through. An end user dashboard that will help you identify all of these questions and that can be visible in your entire organization is something that would make sense.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like that the charges are all based on usage and labor costs. For the time that we spend onboarding almost 252020 FQDN, Akamai charges us only for the traffic usage, but it's only charging us for the labor costs for onboarding."
"The dashboard is the most interesting feature of the Akamai portal where you can have a detailed analysis of all the attacks that are happening. You can drill down an issue and see exactly what is happening, who are the bad guys attacking your website, and how Akamai is protecting the website. That is the most valuable feature."
"The solution can scale extremely well."
"The product is user-friendly."
"Everything will be handled by Akamai's system before it reaches our infrastructure."
"The CDN and the WAF features are the best."
"Traffic filtering and WAF are valuable."
"It gives us a report of traffic. It gives us a report of the day-to-day URL traffic, and it also gives an individual report. If we reach out to Akamai, they give us the IPs as well."
More Akamai App and API Protector pros
"In the DDoS it's difficult to validate what is a genuine request from an end user. We've started being able to do that with the logistics that they have set up. With the protection that they have provided, they are able to identify what is valid and what is not valid. We see that a person who is getting DDoS Neustar service is able to block that particular user. However, while they are doing that it doesn't affect other customers on the server."
 

Cons

"In terms of precedence of Akamai rules, the last one is implemented. That is the one that is operational. If two rules contradict, the last one is implemented. We had a clash, but it was really tough to find that out. I would like to have a rulebook because, in their architecture documentation, it is not mentioned anywhere that if two rules clash, the last one works, and if it does not work, then what to do. This is something we were debating today with their tech support. With AWS, we get documents for the issues so that they do not occur in the future. Akamai's support and knowledge base needs to be improved."
"The solution could offer even more integrations."
"If we talk about application layer attacks, including WAF, CloudFlare is leading. Akamai can focus a bit more on the application layer attacks and how to protect them."
"They are already very flexible, but room for improvement is there. Reports generation could be better and should be improved."
"Support and the pricing need to improve."
"There are some issues with pushing configurations across a network. It still takes about 20 minutes and that means to retract it's another 20 minutes."
"The custom rules must be improved."
"One area where Akamai can improve is the captcha part. Cloudflare provides a captcha if there are a certain number of threats. For example, I can assign that if there are 10 requests within a second from a single IP, it should send a captcha to the user. The user should fill in the captcha, and only after that, the user should be able to access our website. This captcha feature should be built into Bot Manager. I love this captcha feature of Cloudflare."
More Akamai App and API Protector cons
"I would like to see a dashboard that shows you the data that is transferred from which end. It's where people start looking at abuse management. People keep questioning when the mitigation is on what service it is and how many GBs are passing through. An end user dashboard that will help you identify all of these questions and that can be visible in your entire organization is something that would make sense."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive, but it is worth the money."
"Its price is at the medium level. It is not very high. It is also not very low. It serves the purpose."
"Its price is slightly high. Every company has a justification for the high price. Overall, it feels worth the money based on how the service has been structured, but we do negotiate it."
"Cost depends on the volume of traffic."
"Akamai is very expensive."
"Price-wise, I would say Akamai's pricing is competitive."
"The product’s price is high."
"Akamai Web Application Protector is an expensive product."
More Akamai App and API Protector pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Akamai Web Application Protector?
The product is user-friendly.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Akamai Web Application Protector?
The price is higher than others. It could be about 80% to 70% more expensive than other tools. So, it’s not just a slight difference.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Akamai Web Application Protector?
It could have better analytics and reporting visibility in the OEM console.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Akamai App and API Protector Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Akamai App and API Protector
Compared 11% of the time
AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector Logo
AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector
Compared 11% of the time
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Akamai App and API Protector Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Akamai App and API Protector
Compared 9% of the time
Cloudflare vs Akamai App and API Protector Logo
Cloudflare vs Akamai App and API Protector
Compared 8% of the time
Arbor DDoS vs Akamai App and API Protector Logo
Arbor DDoS vs Akamai App and API Protector
Compared 7% of the time
More Akamai App and API Protector Competitors
Arbor DDoS vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] Logo
Arbor DDoS vs Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Akamai App and API Protector
July 2025
Akamai App and API Protector reportDownload Akamai App and API Protector product report
Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
June 2025
Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] reportDownload Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

Akamai Web Application Protector, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender
Neustar UltraDDoS, UltraDDoS
 

Overview

Akamai App and API Protector provides website security by preventing DDoS attacks, acting as an application firewall, managing content delivery, and monitoring APIs. It adapts to threat profiles and is used for fast media delivery and identifying malicious activities.

Akamai App and API Protector offers strong protection, adaptable security features, and efficient traffic management. Its WAF blocks IP addresses and country-specific threats while preventing SQL injections. Companies utilize it for scalable CDN services and comprehensive traffic analysis. Known for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly dashboard, this protector stands out for its customizable rules and technical support. Users also highlight the ease of integration and detailed attack insights available through its advanced dashboard.

What are the key features of Akamai App and API Protector?
  • DDoS Protection: Strong defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
  • Scalable CDN: Manages content delivery efficiently under high traffic loads.
  • WAF Capabilities: Blocks specific IPs and countries, prevents SQL injections.
  • Traffic Filtering: Analyzes and controls incoming requests to maintain security.
  • Adaptive Stream Delivery: Adjusts content delivery to meet bandwidth needs.
What benefits should users expect?
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security tools at a competitive price.
  • Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
  • Scalability: Easily handles increasing traffic and data loads.
  • Ease of Integration: Simple integration with existing systems.
  • Insightful Analytics: Offers data-driven insights into traffic and attack patterns.

In media, Akamai App and API Protector ensures smooth streaming by handling high bandwidth demands. E-commerce companies use it to guard against fraud and data breaches. Financial sectors rely on its ability to protect sensitive transactions. Implementations in healthcare focus on safeguarding patient data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Akamai

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] is an enterprise-level DDoS protection service designed to safeguard online operations by mitigating attack risks. It provides comprehensive security features that ensure continuous online availability.

Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] has been valued for its robust ability to protect against distributed denial-of-service attacks. It offers scalability and effective traffic analysis to detect potential threats swiftly. The system can be enhanced by addressing needs for customization and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure. Despite being end-of-life, it set a standard for DDoS protection through proactive monitoring and advanced threat detection technologies.

What are the most important features of Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL]?
  • Advanced Traffic Analysis: Identifies and mitigates threats in real-time.
  • Scalability: Protects networks of all sizes from large-scale attacks.
  • Proactive Monitoring: Continuously scans for vulnerabilities and potential threats.
Which benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
  • Reduced Downtime: Ensures constant access to services during attacks.
  • Cost Efficiency: Limits financial losses by maintaining operations.
  • Enhanced Security: Provides peace of mind with comprehensive threat management.

In industries like finance and e-commerce, Neustar UltraDDoS [EOL] was crucial for maintaining transaction integrity and service reliability. It provided peace of mind to businesses by ensuring network stability, allowing them to focus on growth without disruption concerns.

TransUnion
 

Sample Customers

Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet
Choxi
Buyer's Guide
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Radware, NETSCOUT and others in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.