Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Trend Vision One - Cloud Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and Trend Vision One - Cloud Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Guardicore Centra offers the best coverage specifically in backward compatibility with legacy operating systems.""We like the centralized management of the firewalls. Until we installed Guardicore Centra, we managed all our firewalls individually, so making changes was complicated, difficult, and time-consuming.""This tool greatly helps in understanding the footprint of the attacks.""The most valuable features of the solution are the maps and ring fencing that help monitor events.""That is primarily because I've seen increased rules. It's kind of caught us a little off guard. With GuardiCore, I have had to deal with their technical support and engineering team in Israel. They are amazing. They are very quick to adapt.""The tool is a complete package that offers many features like visibility. You can get a graph with real-time workflows and visibility into server-to-server communication. We get visibility into many things happening within our environment.""The interface and dashboard are amazing.""Its deception features are great, providing a rich telemetry of lured origins, and are a great resource for any active defense strategy."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Pros →

"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution.""The storage and computing features are valuable.""The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight.""It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints.""The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities.""I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most.""Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS.""Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."

More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pros →

Cons
"The long-term management of the security policies could be improved with some kind of automation platform, something like Chef or Puppet or Ansible, to help you manage the policies after day-one... to then manage the policies and changes to those policies, going forward, through some type of automation process is not turning out to be really easy.""It would be very helpful for beginners if the solution had more windows to help with the terms inside instead of going to the documentation.""It doesn't support a PAAC solution (Platforma as a service) in the cloud.""The dashboard needs improvement. It should be more flexible so that I can easily see what I want or need to see.""The maps could go a bit faster. They are useful but slightly slow.""Customers would want to see the cost improved.""Needs more customization of honeypots and a vaster catalog of systems able to be mimicked.""Incident tagging could be improved. Other vendors offer semi-automatic tagging, which Guardicore doesn't yet have."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Cons →

"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input.""They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance.""The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols.""One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive.""Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful.""The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT.""The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent.""Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."

More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "GuardiCore has made some new changes to the license now. We've seen monthly and annual licenses based on a subscription. We have a few clients that pay anywhere from $25,000 a year."
  • "Compared to the pricing we were seeing from both Illumio and Edgewise, Guardicore was very competitive."
  • "Guardicore Centra provides better value for money than NSX, was the other solution that we looked at, which was too expensive for what it does."
  • "This is not a cheap solution but you have to consider the bigger picture, which is what it is giving you."
  • "The customer would complain about the cost."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced and I would rate it a six out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
  • "The price is the same as other products in the market. There's no price argument to choose one or the other product, it will cost the customer approximately the same."
  • "Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is expensive."
  • More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a slightly expensive product."
  • "Pricing for Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security in the corporate market is okay."
  • "The is price is 25% cheaper than it was a couple of years ago, which is good."
  • "The price could be lower. That is a bit of a consideration."
  • "The pricing for Cloud One is reasonable because my costs scale up and down based on my infrastructure usage."
  • "With everything I deal with, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is somewhere in the middle."
  • "One year ago, Trend transitioned to a credit system for licensing, which has confused users."
  • More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Guardicore Centra offers the best coverage specifically in backward compatibility with legacy operating systems.
    Top Answer:The pricing is too high. Based on market standards, I'd recommend lowering the price. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being affordable. The DQE feature increases the license cost… more »
    Top Answer:Customers would want to see the cost improved.
    Top Answer:The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight.
    Top Answer:The is price is 25% cheaper than it was a couple of years ago, which is good.
    Top Answer:The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent.
    Ranking
    Views
    6,151
    Comparisons
    3,346
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    442
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    5,565
    Comparisons
    1,705
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    1,092
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Guardicore Centra, GuardiCore
    Trend Micro Cloud One , Cloud One Workload Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Application Security, Cloud One File Storage Security, Cloud One Network Security, Cloud One Conformity
    Learn More
    Akamai
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is a software-based microsegmentation solution that provides the simplest, fastest, and most intuitive way to enforce Zero Trust principles. It enables you to prevent malicious lateral movement in your network through precise segmentation policies, visuals of activity within your IT environment, and network security alerts. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation works across your data centers, multicloud environments, and endpoints. It is faster to deploy than infrastructure segmentation approaches and provides you with unparalleled visibility and control of your network.

    Trend Vision One- Cloud Security Security provides comprehensive cloud security, threat protection, and compliance monitoring. Users commend its advanced features, ease of use, and strong performance in keeping digital assets safe. The platform improves efficiency and productivity for organizations while offering excellent customer support.

    Sample Customers
    Santander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE
    * **ABN AMRO** * **Accenture** * **Acer** * **Adidas** * **Aetna** * **AIG** * **Air France-KLM** * **Airtel** * **Allianz** * **Amazon** * **American Express** * **Amadeus** * **Aon** * **Apple** * **AT&T** * **Audi** * **Aviva** * **Bank of America** * **Bank of China** * **Bank of Montreal** * **Barclays** * **Bayer** * **Berkshire Hathaway** * **BNP Paribas** * **Boeing** * **BT** * **Cadbury** * **Carrefour** * **Caterpillar** * **Cisco** * **Coca-Cola** * **Comcast** * **ConocoPhillips** * **Credit Suisse** * **Danone** * **Dell** * **Deutsche Bank** * **Disney** * **Eni** * **Ericsson** * **ExxonMobil** * **FedEx** * **Fiat Chrysler** * **Ford** * **Freescale** * **GE** * **Google** * **H&M** * **Honda** * **Honeywell** * **HSBC** * **IBM** * **Intel** * **JPMorgan Chase** * **Kellogg's** * **Konica Minolta** * **L'Oréal** * **LVMH** * **Mastercard** * **McDonald's** * **Merck** * **MetLife** * **Microsoft** * **Mitsubishi** * **Nissan** * **Nike** * **Nokia** * **Oracle** * **Panasonic** * **PepsiCo** * **Philip Morris** * **Prudential** * **Qualcomm** * **Rakuten** * **Renault** * **SAP** * **Samsung** * **Santander** * **Schneider Electric** * **Siemens** * **Sony** * **Spotify** * **Starbucks** * **Tesla** * **Toyota** * **Unilever** * **Visa** * **Vodafone** * **Walmart** * **WeWork** * **Western Digital** * **WPP** * **Xerox** * **Yamaha** * **Zara**
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University20%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Government13%
    Retailer13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Hospitality Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization26%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise32%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise43%
    Buyer's Guide
    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is ranked 13th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 17 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 6th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 17 reviews. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Akamai Guardicore Segmentation writes "Allowed us to build out a data center topology without worrying about placement of physical or virtual firewalls that can create bottlenecks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is most compared with Illumio, VMware NSX, Cisco Secure Workload, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.

    See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.