Akamai App and API Protector vs Sucuri comparison

Akamai and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7, while Sucuri Security is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. Akamai holds a 3.6% mindshare in WAF, compared to Sucuri Security’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

Akamai App and API Protector

Read 28 Akamai App and API Protector reviews

3,054 Views
1,379 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

683 Views
269 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai App and API Protector

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Sucuri and Akamai App and API Protector are two competing solutions in the web application security category. While Sucuri is favored for its pricing and support, Akamai is seen as potentially superior due to its comprehensive features, meriting the higher investment.

Features: Sucuri provides robust website security with malware removal, a website firewall, and incident response, focusing on affordability and effective protection. Akamai App and API Protector offers advanced bot management, application-layer encryption, and threat intelligence services, catering to organizations needing comprehensive security.

Room for Improvement: Sucuri could enhance advanced threat management capabilities, integration with third-party tools, and reporting features to compete with more comprehensive solutions. Akamai App and API Protector might focus on reducing complexity in feature management, enhancing affordability for smaller enterprises, and improving the initial learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai App and API Protector benefits from comprehensive cloud integration and high-level support, easing seamless transition and management. Sucuri offers intuitive deployment with user-friendly setup and responsive customer service, making it attractive for users seeking straightforward implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Sucuri's competitive pricing structure and low initial setup costs are ideal for smaller enterprises looking for quick ROI. Akamai App and API Protector requires a higher investment, justified by its extensive feature set and potential for greater long-term ROI for businesses seeking advanced security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai App and API Protector vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Sucuri

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai App and API Protector

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

8th

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud and Data Center Security (10th)

Sucuri

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

24th

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Domain Name System (DNS) Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Akamai App and API Protector is 3.6%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Deepesh Singh

Senior Engineering Manager Cybersecurity at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Bot Manager and different features to manage threats

As a product, it has good capabilities, including professional support. However, it's risky for us to rely on AI for real-time traffic management. We use in-house analytics but avoid automatic actions due to their high impact. For example, I live in a developing country. Everyone has different types of phones, apps, and everything else. So, if someone is using a legacy phone, that is still a use case here. If AI decides that this is an end-of-life phone or end-of-life Android operating system, it starts blocking that traffic. We may potentially lose millions or probably thousands and hundreds of thousands of hits per second. Everything is all about how well we serve payments because we're into payments. So, AI is used for analytics but not for real-time decisions. We can't afford to block traffic based on AI models due to the variety of devices and operating systems our users have.

Read full review

Akshit Malik

Junior Associate - IT at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Provides website security, safeguarding against various threats and effective protection against DDoS attacks

The initial setup is moderate because it's neither too easy nor too hard. Sucuri provides us with many ways to set up our site, handle the routing, and perform the necessary configurations. It's deployed on the cloud. We used the managed service of Sucuri and then routed all the requests from Sucuri to our AWS platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Adaptive stream delivery and WAF protection are valuable."

"The product has a good UI."

"The CDN and the WAF features are the best."

"We are getting security for each and every API."

"The solution easily identifies, delays, or allows business traffic."

"Everything will be handled by Akamai's system before it reaches our infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature is the DDoS protection, which is the main reason we got it."

"The solution can scale extremely well."

More Akamai App and API Protector pros

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

Cons

"There are some issues with pushing configurations across a network. It still takes about 20 minutes and that means to retract it's another 20 minutes."

"Could integrate more features for each security."

"The custom rules must be improved."

"The solution could offer even more integrations."

"We are experimenting with EdgeWorkers to write our own code at the Edge level. It could grow to be much better."

"Akamai needs to focus on quickly responding to risks, even those that may potentially be of zero threat..Maybe some of the documentation is a little confusing. They have a lot of different places where you can go to get information, and some of the information is quite out of date."

"The WAF features definitely have a lot of room for improvement. A lot of the WAF is really basic. For some products or some of our solutions, we need to run a second layer of more advanced WAF. If it had better layer seven protection then we would not need a second WAF."

"Customer support has room for improvement."

More Akamai App and API Protector cons

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"Based on the billing discussions in the DevOps team, Akamai's cost does not seem to be a major thing. However, LOE is an issue. When it comes to support, we know that even all the competitors do this. For a 30-minute issue, they give us a LOE of one or two hours. That is a basic practice, but that is something we worry about."

"The product’s price is high."

"Cost depends on the volume of traffic."

"If you want quality, you have to pay the price. Its price is fair. Their account managers are also very helpful. They help you a lot with pricing even though they are working with Akamai."

"There is no license at all for Akamai. They are going to charge us only for the usage."

"Akamai is very expensive."

"Price-wise, I would say Akamai's pricing is competitive."

More Akamai App and API Protector pricing and cost advice

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

27%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Akamai Web Application Protector?

The product is user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The price is higher than others. It could be about 80% to 70% more expensive than other tools. So, it’s not just a slight difference.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Akamai Web Application Protector?

It could have better analytics and reporting visibility in the OEM console.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sucuri?

The initial setup was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sucuri?

The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sucuri?

The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 11% of the time

AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 8% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 8% of the time

More Akamai App and API Protector Competitors

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 48% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 18% of the time

AWS WAF vs Sucuri

Compared 15% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Sucuri

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector

June 2025

Download Akamai App and API Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

May 2025

Download Sucuri product report

Also Known As

Akamai Web Application Protector, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender

No data available

Overview

Akamai App and API Protector provides website security by preventing DDoS attacks, acting as an application firewall, managing content delivery, and monitoring APIs. It adapts to threat profiles and is used for fast media delivery and identifying malicious activities.

Akamai App and API Protector offers strong protection, adaptable security features, and efficient traffic management. Its WAF blocks IP addresses and country-specific threats while preventing SQL injections. Companies utilize it for scalable CDN services and comprehensive traffic analysis. Known for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly dashboard, this protector stands out for its customizable rules and technical support. Users also highlight the ease of integration and detailed attack insights available through its advanced dashboard.

What are the key features of Akamai App and API Protector?

DDoS Protection: Strong defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
Scalable CDN: Manages content delivery efficiently under high traffic loads.
WAF Capabilities: Blocks specific IPs and countries, prevents SQL injections.
Traffic Filtering: Analyzes and controls incoming requests to maintain security.
Adaptive Stream Delivery: Adjusts content delivery to meet bandwidth needs.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security tools at a competitive price.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Scalability: Easily handles increasing traffic and data loads.
Ease of Integration: Simple integration with existing systems.
Insightful Analytics: Offers data-driven insights into traffic and attack patterns.

In media, Akamai App and API Protector ensures smooth streaming by handling high bandwidth demands. E-commerce companies use it to guard against fraud and data breaches. Financial sectors rely on its ability to protect sensitive transactions. Implementations in healthcare focus on safeguarding patient data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Akamai

Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.

Sucuri Security

Sample Customers

Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Sucuri

June 2025

Free Report: Akamai App and API Protector vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai App and API Protector vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai App and API Protector vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors and best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.