No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Airlock Digital Application Control vs McAfee Application Control comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Airlock Digital Application...
Ranking in Application Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
McAfee Application Control
Ranking in Application Control
8th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of Airlock Digital Application Control is 10.1%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of McAfee Application Control is 5.7%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Airlock Digital Application Control10.1%
McAfee Application Control5.7%
Other84.2%
Application Control
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Application allow listing has strengthened endpoint security and streamlines software approvals
Airlock Digital Application Control is a solid product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. The biggest challenge is the ongoing effort required to maintain allow listing policies in the environment where applications are updated frequently. While the initial deployment can be planned carefully, keeping policies current as vendors release new versions requires regular attention, and that can become time-consuming for IT teams managing a large number of endpoints. I would appreciate seeing more automation around approving trusted software updates and better integrations with common software deployment and vulnerability management tools to reduce manual effort. Reporting is another area that could be enhanced, particularly with more customizable dashboards and easier ways to generate compliance and operational reports for different audiences. From an administration perspective, some troubleshooting workflows could be more intuitive, especially when identifying why an application was blocked or determining the exact policy responsible for the decision. These limitations have not been significant enough to outweigh the benefits of the product, but addressing them would make day-to-day management more efficient, reduce administrative overhead, and improve the overall experience for security and endpoint management teams. One additional area for improvement is the overall user and administration experience. While the platform is functional, I think some of the management workflows could be simplified so that common tasks such as reviewing blocked applications, approving legitimate software, or tracing the reason behind a policy decision require fewer steps. For organizations with lean IT teams, a more intuitive interface and clearer guidance during policy creation would help reduce the learning curve for new administrators. I would appreciate seeing broader integrations with the endpoint management, SIEM, and IT service management platforms so application events, approval requests, and policy updates can fit more naturally into existing operational workflows. Better APIs and pre-built integrations would reduce manual work and make automation easier for larger environments. More flexible reporting and customizable dashboards would help different teams, whether security operations or compliance, quickly access the information that is most relevant to them without having to manually compile reports. Addressing these areas would improve efficiency and make the product easier to operate as organizations scale their endpoint environments.
reviewer1437648 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Security Specialist at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Easy to configure, reliable, secure, and has good support
With some specific versions, we are experiencing some issues where the policy configuration has some problems with the parent and child processes. There have been problems with the relationship between the parent and child process, from time to time. I would like to see better reporting and alerting features in the future.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Since implementing Airlock Digital Application Control, we have seen around a 50 to 60% reduction in unauthorized application incidents, 30 to 40% less time spent investigating endpoint security events, and lower malware remediation costs, resulting in measurable operational savings and improved IT efficiency."
"The improvements in operational efficiency, security, and risk reduction have made the solution worthwhile for us."
"After applying Airlock Digital Application Control, it has helped us considerably; now we have end-to-end security and end-to-end visibility on any device, including what employees download and what they cannot download, and we have control of everything in our hands."
"Airlock Digital Application Control brings many main benefits to the table that help improve the way the organization functions."
"Airlock Digital Application Control was found to be very light, very fast, and much better than the previous one."
"Airlock Digital Application Control is probably the easiest application control that I’ve come across; the product has a GUI-first, web interface-first approach to application control, and the way that it’s able to present exceptions or identify what those untrusted executions are is the best that I’ve seen in the field."
"What made Airlock Digital Application Control different is the features and options we had to approach a single problem."
"I compare Airlock Digital Application Control very highly to other vendors like ThreatLocker, Microsoft, Ivanti, and Carbon Black."
"The most valuable feature is the whitelisting; I can test the applications and we can also predefine rules for Windows, rules for the application and control."
"This is a basic solution; the policy screen is okay, and it's easy to configure."
"It does its job well, and it's not causing a lot of trouble."
"We also like the Change Control. We can control how things get executed. It has signatures for different kinds of protocols."
 

Cons

"Airlock Digital Application Control should provide a very detailed user manual because when we were new to this application, it was a bit confusing."
"Some of the vulnerabilities that are meant for CVEs specific to Airlock Digital Application Control need to be addressed in newer versions."
"In Airlock Digital Application Control, there are areas for improvement which, more specifically being a security tool, relate to the performance issues that end-user devices are experiencing because of the tool."
"Airlock Digital Application Control could be improved with a better management interface, richer reporting and analytics, broader third-party integrations, and simpler policy creation for large or complex environments."
"What I dislike about Airlock Digital Application Control is that the whole endpoint management concept as implemented there is silly, and they need to have a better flow so you can appropriately do that type of work at the access control layer, not at the machine layer."
"The biggest challenge is the ongoing effort required to maintain allow listing policies in the environment where applications are updated frequently."
"The first thing is that the new version release schedule is quite repetitive, deploying a new agent within a couple of months, which makes it difficult for us to keep in touch because we have a controlled environment and everything must be done via change management."
"Airlock Digital Application Control has room for improvement in detecting and setting a standard environment when updates for programs are released."
"I would like to see better reporting and alerting features in the future."
"The initial setup is not straightforward, it was complex. The manuals don't have all the information you need to deploy it."
"The intrusion detection features should also be improved. It is a very good feature but it should be maximized."
"With some specific versions, we are experiencing some issues where the policy configuration has some problems with the parent and child processes."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
34%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Airlock Digital Application Control?
Airlock Digital Application Control could be improved with a better management interface, richer reporting and analytics, broader third-party integrations, and simpler policy creation for large or ...
What is your primary use case for Airlock Digital Application Control?
My main use case for Airlock Digital Application Control is to implement application whitelisting, prevent unauthorized software from running, and strengthen endpoint security against malware and r...
What advice do you have for others considering Airlock Digital Application Control?
My advice to others looking into using Airlock Digital Application Control is to start with a clear application control strategy, use audit mode before enforcing policies, involve application owner...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Application, Change Control
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Contec
Find out what your peers are saying about Airlock Digital Application Control vs. McAfee Application Control and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.