AgilePoint vs GitLab comparison

Read 91 GitLab reviews

24,017 Views
2,402 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

AgilePoint and GitLab are competitive products in application development and management. GitLab appears to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set and robust DevOps capabilities, making it a preferred choice for scalability and complete project lifecycle management.

Features: AgilePoint offers process management, low-code development, and seamless integrations with platforms like Microsoft and UiPath. GitLab is valued for its repository management, CI/CD pipelines, and an intuitive interface that allows easy code reviews and integrations.

Room for Improvement: AgilePoint could enhance its enterprise integration and user interface design to ensure smoother workflow automation. Its documentation could also be expanded for better user guidance. GitLab might improve its feature set accessibility and introduce more advanced DevOps tools. Additionally, enhancing user onboarding could increase its usability for new teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AgilePoint offers flexible deployment with hands-on customer support, allowing rapid customization for business needs. GitLab provides straightforward deployment and benefits from extensive documentation and community support, ensuring users can troubleshoot and optimize independently.

Pricing and ROI: AgilePoint provides competitive pricing with a focus on quick ROI through its low-code features. GitLab, while potentially higher in initial costs, offers substantial long-term ROI by integrating DevOps tools, ensuring value for larger, scalable deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. GitLab Report (Updated: August 2026).

AgilePoint vs. GitLab

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (18th), Low-Code Development Platforms (20th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (23rd)

GitLab

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th), Build Automation (3rd), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (4th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 1.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 1.6%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GitLab	1.6%
AgilePoint	1.5%
Other	96.9%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2649213

Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Business processes are automated efficiently with a well-designed interface

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often claim to solve all process automation needs, but they only handle problems of certain complexity. AgilePoint cannot handle highly complex processes like ERPs.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Role-based workflows have transformed daily deployments and improve team collaboration

GitLab has role-based access control, so when a team member needs to make a code change, they cannot directly apply it to the environment but must put in a merge request. Once a senior reviews the code and approves it, then it is implemented across the environment, making it safer and allowing everyone to experience the process. The best features GitLab offers are version control and automation, which are the major things that stand out to me. When it comes to access, the login is very smooth, with just one login integrated with our Okta, allowing everyone to log in easily. Deployments become much easier, and that is how GitLab helps. The automation features make my work easier because we use a tool called AWX, which is connected to GitLab. Whenever we run a job on AWX, it directly checks the code and uses it. Since the code is not preserved locally but kept in the cloud, it is safe and nobody can tamper with it. When it comes to safety, that is a major thing. Automation features allow the code to be accessed from any tools we use, so the jobs we run are helping tremendously and doing their work perfectly. For pipeline tasks, we have created a significant amount of pipelines, which are all hosted in GitLab. Running the pipelines has become much easier, and they are doing a perfect job, helping tremendously in our day-to-day activities. GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks. Since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother. Improvements from GitLab have led to better team collaboration because when several people are working, they can all edit the code and submit it as a merge request, and once approved, it reflects directly to the main branch. Many can work at the same time. When it comes to deployments, deploying has become much faster since we started using GitLab, and even if errors occur, we can spot them easily and troubleshoot, which has helped tremendously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Anytime companies need any solution with workflow, they can base it on AgilePoint, because AgilePoint allows companies to design and implement workflows very fast using the system's interface."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"I like the design and the integration capacity, and it's also easy to use."

"We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature."

"It scales well."

"For us, Gitlab's most valuable feature is the integration with Cypress. We're using Cypress as an automation tool, so we're using GitLab as a tool for running in parallel."

"The CI/CD pipeline with Helm has significantly improved deployment speed and efficiency."

"I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently."

"CI/CD is valuable for me."

"Because of the simplicity of the product, GitLab is better than Jenkins."

"The dashboard and interface make it easy to use."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"Technical support is very slow to respond and they need to be quicker in getting back to clients when problems arise."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating."

"Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good."

"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository."

"From the DevOps perspective, the way we deploy applications is too complicated. It needs to be simplified."

"I don't really like the new Kubernetes integration because it is pretty focused on the on-premise environment, but we're in a hybrid environment."

"We'd like to see better integration with the Atlassian ecosystem. There needs to be better and native integration."

"Atlassian offers more products than GitLab. GitLab offers source control management, version control and collaboration between developers. Atlassian offers features on top of this as well as more integration points for developers."

"The integration could be slightly better."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The setup cost for GitLab is minimal since the team has its own minimal resource balancing. The costing falls into an intermediate stage and is impactful across all results within the team. It allo...

What needs improvement with GitLab?

There are many improvements that GitLab can implement, such as addressing the issue of caching. Currently, when I have multiple tasks to merge or attempt multiple merges, the CI/CD and overall GitL...

What is your primary use case for GitLab?

My main use case for GitLab is as a version control system that we are using. Currently, I am working on an end-to-end AI pipeline, and I have deployed my whole code using GitLab so that all things...

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Comparisons

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 33% of the time

Compared 5% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 5% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 3% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AgilePoint

Compared 3% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 33% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

Jenkins vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Veracode vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Business Process Management (BPM)

Download AgilePoint product report

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fuzzit

Overview

AgilePoint offers rapid app development through automation and digitization with a low-code, no-code approach, integrating seamlessly into business processes.

AgilePoint efficiently automates business workflows, transforming traditional document-based processes into digital applications. With integrations like Dynamics 365 and SharePoint, users automate approvals and workflows involving multiple stakeholders. AgilePoint's intuitive design enables the rapid crafting of workflows, allowing teams to develop forms, reports, and custom portals suitable for complex environments. Its strengths lie in process management, application integration, and ease of use, enabling efficient data management and access through anonymous forms.

What are AgilePoint's key features?

Automation: Simplifies business processes, reducing manual intervention.
Low-Code Development: Allows rapid application design without extensive coding.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with applications like Microsoft and UiPath.
Workflow Management: Streamlines approvals and stakeholder communication.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy navigation and task execution.

What benefits should users find in reviews?

Efficiency: Quickly transforms workflows into digital applications.
Flexibility: Supports multiple roles, enhancing collaboration.
Scalability: Potentially benefits from Docker compatibility for growth.
Technical Support: Demand for faster response and enhanced AI support.
Knowledge Base: Aids in advanced training and user experience improvement.

In industries like corporate enterprises, AgilePoint is leveraged to automate workflows, creating form-based applications that streamline tasks such as idea submission and file management. Its robust functionality meets complex process needs, ensuring efficient data handling across departments.

AgilePoint

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

AgilePoint vs. GitLab