AgilePoint vs GitLab comparison

Read 91 GitLab reviews

17,443 Views
1,570 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

AgilePoint and GitLab are competitive products in application development and management. GitLab appears to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set and robust DevOps capabilities, making it a preferred choice for scalability and complete project lifecycle management.

Features: AgilePoint offers process management, low-code development, and seamless integrations with platforms like Microsoft and UiPath. GitLab is valued for its repository management, CI/CD pipelines, and an intuitive interface that allows easy code reviews and integrations.

Room for Improvement: AgilePoint could enhance its enterprise integration and user interface design to ensure smoother workflow automation. Its documentation could also be expanded for better user guidance. GitLab might improve its feature set accessibility and introduce more advanced DevOps tools. Additionally, enhancing user onboarding could increase its usability for new teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AgilePoint offers flexible deployment with hands-on customer support, allowing rapid customization for business needs. GitLab provides straightforward deployment and benefits from extensive documentation and community support, ensuring users can troubleshoot and optimize independently.

Pricing and ROI: AgilePoint provides competitive pricing with a focus on quick ROI through its low-code features. GitLab, while potentially higher in initial costs, offers substantial long-term ROI by integrating DevOps tools, ensuring value for larger, scalable deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. GitLab Report (Updated: December 2025).

Download the complete report

AgilePoint vs. GitLab

December 2025

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (19th), Low-Code Development Platforms (18th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (23rd)

GitLab

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (11th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (9th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (4th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 2.7%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	2.7%
AgilePoint	1.0%
Other	96.3%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2649213

Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Business processes are automated efficiently with a well-designed interface

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often claim to solve all process automation needs, but they only handle problems of certain complexity. AgilePoint cannot handle highly complex processes like ERPs.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Role-based workflows have transformed daily deployments and improve team collaboration

GitLab has role-based access control, so when a team member needs to make a code change, they cannot directly apply it to the environment but must put in a merge request. Once a senior reviews the code and approves it, then it is implemented across the environment, making it safer and allowing everyone to experience the process. The best features GitLab offers are version control and automation, which are the major things that stand out to me. When it comes to access, the login is very smooth, with just one login integrated with our Okta, allowing everyone to log in easily. Deployments become much easier, and that is how GitLab helps. The automation features make my work easier because we use a tool called AWX, which is connected to GitLab. Whenever we run a job on AWX, it directly checks the code and uses it. Since the code is not preserved locally but kept in the cloud, it is safe and nobody can tamper with it. When it comes to safety, that is a major thing. Automation features allow the code to be accessed from any tools we use, so the jobs we run are helping tremendously and doing their work perfectly. For pipeline tasks, we have created a significant amount of pipelines, which are all hosted in GitLab. Running the pipelines has become much easier, and they are doing a perfect job, helping tremendously in our day-to-day activities. GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks. Since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother. Improvements from GitLab have led to better team collaboration because when several people are working, they can all edit the code and submit it as a merge request, and once approved, it reflects directly to the main branch. Many can work at the same time. When it comes to deployments, deploying has become much faster since we started using GitLab, and even if errors occur, we can spot them easily and troubleshoot, which has helped tremendously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"I like GitLab from the CI/CD perspective. It is much easier to set up CI/CD and then integrate with other tools."

"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team."

"In terms of impact from using GitLab as an all-in-one DevOps platform, it helped with my project development life cycle."

"GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks, and since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother."

"It is very useful for reviews. We are using branch merging operations and full reset operations. It is also very useful for merging our code and tracking another branch. The graph diagrams of Git are very useful. Its interface is straightforward and not too complex for us."

"I have had no problem with the stability of the solution."

"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."

"GitLab is scalable and works well with multiple environments."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"They should add more information about functionality."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"Technologies are always changing. Nowadays, new things like serverless computing and workload management have emerged. We have noticed a few gap items for faster service delivery. For example, we do user interface testing in the latest team and automate it using some tools. Recently, we integrated a tool with user interface testing, which can simulate a multi-user environment. So, we would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security."

"GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges, which might not be favorable. Integrating these features into GitLab would streamline the pipeline and make it more convenient for users."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"I would like to see security increased in the future. A secure environment is very important."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

"GitLab should work on improving their user interface for GitOps as it is lagging behind."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"The price is okay."

"GitLab is cheap."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

15%

University

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

What is your primary use case for AgilePoint?

I use AgilePoint for business process automation. Traditionally, approvals and file movements within an organization would require physical documents. AgilePoint digitizes these processes by conver...

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The setup cost was moderate and not very high. For GitLab SaaS, the initial setup cost was minimal, while self-managed GitLab involved infrastructure, VM storage backups, runner configuration, and ...

What needs improvement with GitLab?

A pain point I have encountered with GitLab is that large GitLab-ci.yml files become hard to read and maintain. YAML syntax is strict, and errors are easy to make, while debugging pipeline logic ca...

Nintex Process Platform vs AgilePoint

Comparisons

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 19% of the time

Compared 10% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 8% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AgilePoint

Compared 7% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 48% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download AgilePoint product report

Download GitLab product report

January 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Fuzzit

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG