Adobe Web Experience Management vs Teradata comparison

Adobe Web Experience Manage...

Read 83 Teradata reviews

10,773 Views
431 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Teradata and Adobe Web Experience Management compete in the realms of data analytics and content management, respectively. Adobe is perceived to have an advantage due to its outstanding features that significantly enhance user engagement and digital presence, despite its higher cost.

Features:Teradata offers advanced data analytics, seamless scalability, and strong integration capabilities. Adobe Web Experience Management focuses on digital asset management, personalization, and content creation tools, which are pivotal for optimizing digital experiences and user customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Adobe Web Experience Management provides cloud-based deployment, allowing for rapid implementation and improved scalability. It offers extensive support resources and dedicated account management. Teradata, being primarily on-premise, demands more time for deployment, requiring technical expertise, but it delivers comprehensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI:Teradata's pricing, often based on data consumption, can be costly but yields substantial ROI through enhanced data insights and operational efficiencies. Adobe Web Experience Management, with its higher initial cost, delivers ROI by boosting digital presence and driving revenue growth through innovative features that enhance customer satisfaction and interaction.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Web Experience Management vs. Teradata Report (Updated: December 2025).

Adobe Web Experience Management vs. Teradata

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Web Experience Manage...

Ranking in Customer Experience Management

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Customer Experience Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (15th), Data Integration (15th), Relational Databases Tools (6th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (8th), Marketing Management (5th), Cloud Data Warehouse (3rd), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Customer Experience Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Web Experience Management is 2.1%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 1.8%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Experience Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Teradata	1.8%
Adobe Web Experience Management	2.1%
Other	96.1%

Customer Experience Management

Featured Reviews

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

It has a lot of features, and it is very easy to learn, use, integrate, and manage

It would be better if it also supports some styling. Currently, whenever we have to do design for a particular client according to their brand strategy, it takes a good amount of effort. Adobe never focuses on this area. They say that you design your pages, templates, etc. If they can define common components or a common section of the style sheet so that if you want to have a button by default, you can go and just mention the specifications, such as the color code, and those specifications are automatically followed across the whole site or multiple sites according to the brand strategy. Such functionality will be helpful because currently, it takes a lot of effort to manage them separately. They can increase the number of components in terms of combinations. For example, if I take an image and a text component, currently, Adobe gives you just an image and text component. It should provide multiple versions, such as image, text, and video. That's because, on most of the sites, clients always come up with this combination. They want to have a video. They want to have an image, and they want to have some text. There could be options to have any of the following combinations: * The image on the left, the video on the right, and the text at the bottom. * The image on the left, the video on the right, and the text at the top. * The image in the center, the video on top, and the text at the bottom. If they can come up with such permutations and combinations, it will make the work easier. It will help us in putting out the site in a faster way, instead of us having to do the regular development every time. They can come up with some out-of-the-box components to help you drag and drop a video that will be displayed in a particular player. Currently, some of the features are not available, and we have to customize them. They can look into the top video players that are being used by most of the end-users from a location and provide out-of-the-box components. They can look into the features of YouTube, Vimeo, and other top players.

Read full review

David Durand Velásquez

Engineers at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Delivers consistent performance and enables advanced analytics across complex data environments

Teradata stands out as a solid platform for managing and analyzing large volumes of data. Its architecture allows information to be processed efficiently while maintaining stable performance, even in highly demanding environments. One of its most notable strengths is the ability to run complex queries at high speed, which is essential for organizations that require timely and reliable analytics. Teradata offers a well-integrated ecosystem that supports working with different types of data and enables scalability as organizational needs grow. Its focus on advanced analytics, integration with modern business intelligence tools, and the ability to operate both on-premise and in the cloud make it a versatile solution for data warehousing and large-scale processing. Teradata's stability, technological maturity, and the availability of strong documentation and best practices are noteworthy. I consider Teradata to be a tool with great potential for any organization looking to enhance its analytical capabilities, optimize data processing, and move toward more data-driven decision-making. Teradata stands out as a solid platform for managing a large volume of data in different projects. Its architecture allows information to be processed efficiently while maintaining stable performance, even in high-demanding environments. A well-integrated AI ecosystem that supports working with different types of data and enables scalability as organizational needs grow across different kinds of enterprises or organizations. The focus on advanced analytics integration with modern business intelligence tools is particularly valuable. Teradata combines a powerful parallel process and optimizing SQL engine with a highly scalable architecture allowing businesses to execute complex queries and analytics in real-time. It supports multi-cloud, hybrid, and on-premise environments, giving organizations flexibility to choose the setup that best aligns with their strategy. One of the biggest strengths is the ability to unify disparate data sources and support high concurrency, enabling different teams, such as analytics, operations, BI, and data science, to access consistent, trusted data across the enterprise.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good content and digital management capabilities."

"The templates and components that come out of the box are very helpful, especially in terms of the content fragments and experience fragments. Every client would like to have some templates and components, and they would like to cut down the effort of having to create every component that's customized. So, they try to use them out of the box. Other than that, the user roles and permissions workflows, third-party integrations, and system integration are the features that are very important."

"A conventional and easily defined way to build a data warehouse or a layer of data marts."

"Teradata can be deployed on-premise, on the cloud, or in a virtual machine, which means customers can move without having to create their architecture all over again."

"Teradata can be easily used in ETL mode transformations, so there is no need for expensive and inconvenient ETL tools"

"Teradata's capabilities enhance data management efficiency, support scalability, and contribute to faster query performance."

"The data processing, clustering, and distributed computing are impressive."

"It has given our business the ability to gain insights into the data and create data labs for analysis and PoCs."

"Teradata combines a powerful parallel process and optimizing SQL engine with a highly scalable architecture allowing businesses to execute complex queries and analytics in real-time."

"It has reduced a lot of reworking on maintaining indexes, partitions, etc."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"It would be better if it also supports some styling. Currently, whenever we have to do design for a particular client according to their brand strategy, it takes a good amount of effort. Adobe never focuses on this area. They say that you design your pages, templates, etc. If they can define common components or a common section of the style sheet so that if you want to have a button by default, you can go and just mention the specifications, such as the color code, and those specifications are automatically followed across the whole site or multiple sites according to the brand strategy. Such functionality will be helpful because currently, it takes a lot of effort to manage them separately."

"Unable to handle very large video files."

"The solution’s pricing, scalability, and technical support response time could be improved."

"I would not say it was very performance efficient, but it was definitely good."

"Azure Synapse SQL has evolved from a solely dedicated support tool to a data lake. It can store data from multiple systems, not just traditional database management systems. On the other hand, Teradata has limitations in loading flat files or unstructured data directly into its warehouse. In Azure Synapse SQL, we can implement machine learning using Python scripts. Additionally, Azure Synapse SQL offers advanced analytical capabilities compared to Teradata. Teradata is also expensive."

"There is a need to improve performance in high transaction processes, as well as the reporting system."

"The following could be better: licensing, architecture openness, integration with other tools."

"Teradata could be improved by having a web interface that can really help users to plug and play."

"Their level of technical support is adequate. It could be better."

"It is hard for some of our users to set up rules for cleansing and transforming data, so this is something that could be improved."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's definitely an expensive solution, but it comes with a lot of features and scalability. As compared to other content management systems that we have in the market, AEM is the costliest one. There is no hidden or additional fee."

"Make sure you have the in-house skills to design and support the solution, as relying on external sources is extremely costly and tends to lock you into specific platforms, tools, and paradigms."

"The cost is significantly high."

"We are looking for a more flexible cost model for the next version that we use, whether it be cloud or on-premise."

"In this day and age, we want to get things done quickly. So, we go to the AWS Marketplace."

"Teradata is expensive, so it's typically marketed to big customers. However, there have been some changes, and Teradata is now offering more flexible pricing models and equipment leasing. They've added pay-as-you-go and cloud models, so it's changing, but Teradata is generally known as an expensive high-end product."

"Teradata's licensing is on the expensive side."

"The tool costs about 30,000 euros a month, while Azure Synapse SQL only costs 10,000."

"We had a lot of parties involved when purchasing from the AWS Marketplace. They are very flexible and aggressive in trying to close the deal. They are good at what they have to offer and listening to the customer. It's a two-way street."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Experience Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

See all answers

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

See all answers

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sitecore Customer Engagement Platform vs Adobe Web Experience Management

Compared 100% of the time

More Adobe Web Experience Management Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Database vs Teradata

Compared 5% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Customer Experience Management

Download Adobe Web Experience Management product report

Download Teradata product report

Also Known As

No data available

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture, Teradata Vantage Enterprise (DIY)

Overview

Adobe Web Experience Management (WEM) is a comprehensive content management system that empowers businesses to create, manage, and deliver personalized digital experiences across multiple channels. With its intuitive interface and robust features, WEM enables organizations to streamline their content creation process, enhance customer engagement, and drive conversions.

One of the key features of Adobe WEM is its powerful content-authoring capabilities. The platform provides a user-friendly interface that allows content creators to easily create and edit web pages, blogs, and other digital assets. With its drag-and-drop functionality and customizable templates, users can quickly design and publish content without the need for technical expertise.

Another standout feature of Adobe WEM is its robust personalization capabilities. The platform leverages advanced targeting and segmentation tools to deliver personalized experiences to each individual user. By analyzing user behavior and preferences, WEM enables businesses to deliver relevant content and offers, increasing customer engagement and driving conversions.

Adobe WEM also offers seamless integration with other Adobe products, such as Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target. This integration allows businesses to gain valuable insights into user behavior and preferences, enabling them to optimize their digital experiences and drive better results. Additionally, WEM's integration with Adobe Target enables businesses to run A/B tests and personalized campaigns, further enhancing the effectiveness of their marketing efforts.

Furthermore, Adobe WEM provides comprehensive content management capabilities, including version control, workflow management, and content reuse. These features enable businesses to efficiently manage their content lifecycle, ensuring consistency and accuracy across all channels.

Adobe

Teradata is a powerful tool for handling substantial data volumes with its parallel processing architecture, supporting both cloud and on-premise environments efficiently. It offers impressive capabilities for fast query processing, data integration, and real-time reporting, making it suitable for diverse industrial applications.

Known for its robust parallel processing capabilities, Teradata effectively manages large datasets and provides adaptable deployment across cloud and on-premise setups. It enhances performance and scalability with features like advanced query tuning, workload management, and strong security. Users appreciate its ease of use and automation features which support real-time data reporting. The optimizer and intelligent partitioning help improve query speed and efficiency, while multi-temperature data management optimizes data handling.

What are the key features of Teradata?

Parallel Processing Architecture: Enables efficient handling of substantial data volumes.
Cloud and On-Premise Deployment: Offers seamless adaptability across environments.
Query Tuning: Improves speed and performance of data retrieval processes.
Workload Management: Ensures optimal resource allocation for enhanced performance.
Robust Security: Provides high levels of data protection and system integrity.
Data Integration: Facilitates cohesive data management from multiple sources.
Automation for Real-time Reporting: Enhances timely data insights and decision-making.
Optimizer and Intelligent Partitioning: Further increase query speed and system efficiency.
Multi-Temperature Data Management: Optimizes the handling and retrieval of data.

What benefits and ROI do users look for?

Efficient Data Management: Facilitates smooth integration and processing of diverse data sets.
Scalability: Easy adjustment to increasing or decreasing data requirements.
Improved Performance: Fast query speeds and optimized resource use.
Comprehensive Security: Safeguards data integrity and accessibility.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data handling and operational processes.

In the finance, retail, and government sectors, Teradata is employed for data warehousing, business intelligence, and analytical processing. It handles vast datasets for activities like customer behavior modeling and enterprise data integration. Supporting efficient reporting and analytics, Teradata enhances data storage and processing, whether deployed on-premise or on cloud platforms.

Sample Customers

Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg, University of Georgia, The University of Auckland, Dalhousie University, KfW Bankengruppe, IG Group, National Australia Bank, Investec, New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT), Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), Singapore Tourism Board, European Southern Observatory (ESO)

Netflix

Adobe Web Experience Management vs. Teradata