We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] and Mendix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce and others in Mobile Development Platforms."I have found Adobe Experience Manager Mobile to be reliable."
"I think it's the best content management system, fulfilling all the requirements of a CMS tool."
"It is a brilliant solution."
"The most valuable features are the decorative style, model-driven development, and the fact that Mendix validates flows. Mendix is quick to develop because it's a low-code platform. It's very robust, flexible, open, and scalable. It's for a low-code customer. The tooling is also really good and it has mobile capabilities."
"It is stable."
"The most valuable features are the integration and UI customization."
"The development environment is model-driven. We can use the information from this for our business engineers to make the information models, and they can also execute the model."
"The features that I have found most valuable with Mendix are its business process management and its minimal low code, both from an interface perspective and from a process perspective."
"I think that the workflow and automation features are quite good."
"The most valuable features of Mendix are the drag and drop functions, the data entities, domain models, and all the related features."
"Adobe Experience Manager Mobile could be improved by making it much easier to share the design system between different projects."
"The license cost is too high, and customers hesitate to implement this solution."
"One thing I would like to improve is the support system offered by Mendix. It can sometimes take a while to get the help I need when I'm using Mendix."
"It needs to provide an overview of model versioning control for the sake of the review process; better SCRUM board; an overview of model changes from the repository through Sprintr (SCRUM board). Also, a choice between versioning control system would be nice."
"There's no direct tech support."
"I would like to see more documentation as well as how-to documents."
"Mendix could improve by allowing the customization of different programming languages, such as Python and C++."
"While the community is great, they need to work on making their direct technical support services better."
"There needs to be an increase in the number of the UI components."
"The code refactoring tools could be better, especially for applications running for years. It's not bad, but it could be smoother. Also, writing new widgets can be trickier than it should be for some people, but not if you're familiar with Mendix."
More Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Mobile Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Mendix is ranked 2nd in Mobile Development Platforms with 48 reviews. Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Mendix is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] writes "Fulfills all the requirements of a CMS tool and is stable and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mendix writes "Low-code, helpful support, and great native mobile capability". Adobe Experience Manager Mobile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Mendix is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Appian and ServiceNow.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.