Parasoft SOAtest and Acunetix compete in the testing and security analysis category. Acunetix seems to have the upper hand because of its comprehensive feature set and security-focused capabilities.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest is recognized for its integration with various platforms, offering automation features that ensure comprehensive environments. It supports extensive testing capabilities and seamless workflow integrations. Acunetix is known for vulnerability detection and scanning efficiency, providing automated security assessments and detailed threat reports, delivering a broad range of tools for security analysis.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users suggest enhancing the interface intuitiveness, improving reporting functionalities, and refining user engagement elements. Acunetix users recommend faster scanning speeds, better integration with third-party tools, and streamlined data management capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest provides a structured deployment process, although users desire quicker setup times and more personalized customer support. Acunetix deployment is smooth, with potential issues noted in customer response times, but it generally offers a seamless initial experience.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest users are generally satisfied with pricing, considering it fair in terms of ROI, but note a need for better long-term value. Acunetix, despite higher costs, provides substantial returns due to its advanced features, making it favored for ROI considerations.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
The technical support from Acunetix is quite good
The support program was helpful in addressing it.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
