

Parasoft SOAtest and Acunetix compete in the testing and security analysis category. Acunetix seems to have the upper hand because of its comprehensive feature set and security-focused capabilities.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest is recognized for its integration with various platforms, offering automation features that ensure comprehensive environments. It supports extensive testing capabilities and seamless workflow integrations. Acunetix is known for vulnerability detection and scanning efficiency, providing automated security assessments and detailed threat reports, delivering a broad range of tools for security analysis.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users suggest enhancing the interface intuitiveness, improving reporting functionalities, and refining user engagement elements. Acunetix users recommend faster scanning speeds, better integration with third-party tools, and streamlined data management capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest provides a structured deployment process, although users desire quicker setup times and more personalized customer support. Acunetix deployment is smooth, with potential issues noted in customer response times, but it generally offers a seamless initial experience.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest users are generally satisfied with pricing, considering it fair in terms of ROI, but note a need for better long-term value. Acunetix, despite higher costs, provides substantial returns due to its advanced features, making it favored for ROI considerations.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
I could supply it with maybe a Swagger file or a JSON file, and Acunetix would pick it up, scan all the endpoints according to the OWASP Top Ten, and give me remediation and actionable remediation reports.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Acunetix | 2.6% |
| Parasoft SOAtest | 0.7% |
| Other | 96.7% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.