ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Redwood RunMyJobs comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Redwood Software are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #19, while Redwood Software is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 2.8% mindshare in WA, compared to Redwood Software’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Redwood Software users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 36 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

1,943 Views
1,477 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Redwood RunMyJobs

Read 30 Redwood RunMyJobs reviews

2,971 Views
2,971 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Redwood RunMyJobs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Redwood RunMyJobs are key players in the automation tool sector. Based on the features, Redwood RunMyJobs has a slight advantage due to its strong event-driven automation and real-time monitoring capabilities, essential for enterprises with hybrid needs.

Features: ActiveBatch stands out for its broad automation capabilities and integration options, allowing for streamlined task management and reduced manual intervention. It gives a clear snapshot of current and future workflows, minimizing manual effort. Redwood RunMyJobs excels with its event-driven automation, ensuring smooth operations between cloud and on-premises systems, and offers real-time monitoring and alerting, which is crucial for maintaining enterprise-level operations.

Room for Improvement: ActiveBatch users suggest that better integration with cloud platforms and improved user interface navigation are needed. Enhancing documentation and addressing version upgrade challenges are also advised. Redwood RunMyJobs could benefit from richer integration with AI, improved reporting features, and a more accessible pricing structure for smaller businesses. Enhanced documentation would aid user onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ActiveBatch offers on-premises and hybrid deployment, appreciated for its robust support though faster escalation responses are desired. The transition to a subscription model has been challenging for some users. Redwood RunMyJobs provides flexibility with support for public and hybrid cloud deployments and has well-received customer service, though pricing concerns exist for smaller implementations.

Pricing and ROI: ActiveBatch is noted for aligning with industry pricing, though recent price hikes with the subscription model have been mentioned. It is valued for boosting efficiency and ROI by reducing manual tasks. Redwood RunMyJobs is considered cost-effective, providing good value and competitive ROI by efficiently handling workloads and integrating across diverse platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,029 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Workload Automation

19th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (34th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (18th)

Redwood RunMyJobs

Ranking in Workload Automation

12th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 2.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Redwood RunMyJobs is 8.7%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Redwood RunMyJobs	8.7%
ActiveBatch by Redwood	2.8%
Other	88.5%

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Associate Consultant at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

MaheshKumar6

Senior Analyst at Electronics For Imaging, Inc

Future-proof and powerful with great support

Improvements include: 1) Cost of the Software. Redwood is more expensive than most of the other Automation Software available today; they could make it budget-friendly. 2) It has limited reporting features. Some basic reporting features are missing. 3) There is no option to extract data in Excel. This feature could help in finding errors in the data. 4) Integration with ServiceNow is not supported. 5) The cloud platform compatibility is not up to the mark. 6) Security standards need to be improved. 7) Handling failure is not great; the workflow stops when a job fails and human intervention is required. 8) Configuration and set-up are difficult for someone with less coding knowledge. 9) They need to provide more documentation to assist new users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Approximately ~20 hours of manual effort have been reduced to ~5 hours with the help of ActiveBatch."

"The automation feature is a very valuable feature as the associates do not have to worry about performing repetitive tasks (i.e. endpoint security scans on a daily basis) that would take several hours to complete on a daily basis."

"Error Handling is one of the best standout features of ActiveBatch."

"What ActiveBatch allows you to do is develop a more efficient process. It gave me visibility into all my jobs so I could choose which jobs to run in parallel. This is much easier than when I have to try to do it through cron for Windows XP, where you really can't do things in parallel and know what is going on."

"From a scheduling point of view, it is pretty good."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to trigger workflows, one after another, based on success, without having to worry about overlapping workflows. The ability to integrate our BI, analytics, and our data quality jobs is also valuable"

"ActiveBatch by Redwood has positively impacted my organization by efficiently managing a significant volume of data and workflow between our database and applications on the web browser."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the versatility of the prebuilt jobs."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"Its monitoring and alerting features are what I found the most valuable."

"It's a very powerful tool. It has a lot of flexibility for how you can define jobs and build them. There are different ways in which you can construct jobs depending on your specific needs and requirements."

"Our team was able to integrate it with the ITSM tool as well as security monitoring tools to make the incident creation process automatically feasible."

"Error handling and the recovery feature ensure that my job processes are not stopped if any error occurs."

"This product is simple and easy to use."

"With automation in place, employees can focus on more strategic tasks that require human expertise, increasing overall productivity."

"This program works with every browser."

"Installing and configuring Redwood agents are easy, and scheduling jobs on Redwood helps in triggering the batches as per business requirements."

More Redwood RunMyJobs pros

Cons

"The help center and documentation are not that helpful."

"Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referring to the documents."

"The reporting needs improvement. There is a real need for the ability to generate audit reports on the fly. It needs to be a lot easier than what I can do right now. This is a major item for me."

"The documentation is very limited, and it can be improved."

"Some improvements can be made to the user interface."

"It could be easier to provide dashboards on how many jobs are running at the same time; more monitoring."

"They should offer pricing that is more affordable."

"Providing some detailed training materials could be very helpful for new users who have very limited technical information about the tool."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"Having a graphical user interface for the dashboard would be great."

"The price wise, it is not affordable. When we compare with other industry leading softwares and even the same scale, there are certain softwares that can compete with Redwood, but Redwood is very highly paced.So it is more SAP friendly, I would say, at this point. Since it was owned by SAP for very long time, they have made it SAP friendly. But if you look at the tool as a enterprise tool. Like, in general, it is not really that great as a tool. So you can you have better options when you couple it with SAP. But if you would like to control your enterprise level applications, anything after that, like, Azure AWS and things like that Oracle."

"Redwood RunMyJobs should add more good features."

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing and accessible to a wide range of users."

"Adding machine learning and AI capabilities would enable Redwood to automate more complex business processes and tasks."

"The documentation for this product is limited, which can be improved in the future."

"Customer support should be enhanced so that we can automatically raise tickets and incidents in customer service."

"Enhancing the user interface would make it more appealing to new users with limited technical knowledge."

More Redwood RunMyJobs cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"It initially surprised me because we went from an application that was priced by connection to agents/the number of agents to an application that was priced based on the number of job executions. At that time, many of the products we looked at were also priced on job execution. That seems to be more common in the business or in the vendors that provide solutions out there, but that was probably our biggest difference."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	55

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What advice do you have for others considering Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition?

Even though it is highly-priced, it is a go to SAP product. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Redwood RunMyJobs?

We can achieve anything that anything that we would like to do. In SAP, it's not generally possible with just with SAP. So we have solution manager as an option, but run by job.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Redwood RunMyJobs?

Price-wise, it is not affordable. When we compare with other industry-leading software and even the same scale, there are certain software that can compete with Redwood, but Redwood is very highly ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 13% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 39% of the time

Control-M vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 23% of the time

Automic Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 11% of the time

Stonebranch vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs

Compared 3% of the time

More Redwood RunMyJobs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

October 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Redwood RunMyJobs

October 2025

Download Redwood RunMyJobs product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

Redwood Software - Workload Automation Edition, Redwood Business Process Automation - Workload Edition, RunMyJobs, Redwood RunMyJobs

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Redwood Software is a prominent player in the enterprise automation space, known for its robust and scalable solutions. It caters to a wide range of industries, offering tools for IT and business process automation. Redwood Software users on PeerSpot often highlights the flexibility and robustness of the solutions. Many users commend the platform for its ability to automate complex and time-consuming processes, which has led to significant time and cost savings. Additionally, the strong customer support and continuous updates are frequently mentioned, indicating a commitment to evolving with customer needs and technological advancements.

Redwood Software offers a holistic suite of automation tools, covering areas such as finance automation, IT process automation, and robotic process automation (RPA). This comprehensive approach ensures that various aspects of business operations can be automated, leading to increased efficiency and reduced manual intervention. Redwood Software is a cloud-native platform, which offers scalability, flexibility, and reduced infrastructure costs.

Redwood Software users shares that its user interfaces is intuitive and this is reducing the learning curve and enabling users across different departments to leverage automation tools effectively. The platform offers sophisticated scheduling and workflow capabilities, allowing for the automation of complex processes.

Redwood Software excels in its ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide range of systems and applications. This integration is key for enterprises that operate in diverse IT environments, ensuring that automation can be implemented across different platforms and applications without compatibility issues. Another important factor for enterprises, is focus on compliance and security, Redwood Software incorporates robust security measures and compliance protocols.

Redwood Software

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

AMD, American Home Shield, Avaya, Burberry, Centrica, City of Dallas, The Container Store, Core & Main, Daikin, Dart Containers, Deere, Energizer, Epson, Halliburton, Keen Foodware, National Gypsum, Rockport Group, Ryder, Technicolor, The University of Michigan, Virgin Money, Whitbread

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

September 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. Redwood RunMyJobs report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.