ActiveBatch by Redwood vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and UiPath are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.4, while UiPath is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 2.8% mindshare in WA, compared to UiPath’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews

2,093 Views
1,633 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Orchestrator

Read 34 UiPath Orchestrator reviews

467 Views
453 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ActiveBatch by Redwood

UiPath Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

ActiveBatch by Redwood and UiPath Orchestrator are leading automation software products competing in the enterprise automation and orchestration domain. ActiveBatch stands out for its single-pane-of-glass feature for monitoring workflows, while UiPath Orchestrator excels with its user-friendly design and AI-integrated features, showcasing a slight advantage depending on specific needs.

Features: ActiveBatch by Redwood offers robust automation, a vast job library, and integration flexibility across platforms. Its single-pane-of-glass monitoring and customizable options add to its strengths. UiPath Orchestrator provides centralized data management, efficient scheduling, and asset handling features. Its AI capabilities further bolster business process automation efficiencies.

Room for Improvement: ActiveBatch could improve its interface simplicity and enhance its monitoring dashboard, reporting capabilities, and cloud support. It would benefit from refining triggers for non-Windows solutions. UiPath Orchestrator may enhance its UI, improve exception automation, and offer a more competitive licensing cost structure. Users suggest intuitive queue interactions and better dashboard integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ActiveBatch is often on-premises with hybrid options, praised for responsive customer service, though sometimes challenged by technical escalations. UiPath Orchestrator offers diverse deployment, including public cloud, with excellent support noted for its responsiveness. User experience can vary based on deployment preferences.

Pricing and ROI: ActiveBatch is viewed as a cost-effective automation investment with flexible licensing, enhancing efficiency and reducing man-hours. UiPath Orchestrator, though priced higher, is acknowledged for its comprehensive capabilities, promising significant ROI. Users suggest pricing could be more competitive compared to tools like Power Automate.

To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. UiPath Orchestrator

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Ranking in Workload Automation

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (9th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th)

UiPath Orchestrator

Ranking in Workload Automation

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 2.8%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti

Senior Analyst at Capgemini

Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation

Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.

Read full review

Bantu Kumar

Senior Technical Director at Globant

Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management

There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive, and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Error Handling is one of the best standout features of ActiveBatch."

"It can connect to a number of third-party/legacy systems."

"From a scheduling point of view, it is pretty good."

"ActiveBatch helped us automate and schedule routine tasks such as data backups, file transfers, database updates, and report generation, which frees IT staff to focus on other studies."

"Using this tool, if there are any huge failures, we immediately get an email notification, and the proper team will be informed, at which time they can act accordingly."

"We use the main job-scheduling feature. It's the only thing we use in the tool. That's the reason we are using the tool: to reduce costs by replacing manual tasks with automated tasks and to perform regular, repetitive tasks in a more reliable way."

"It is very useful in sending confidential files through FPP servers."

"As far as centralization goes it's nice because we can see all these processes that are tied to this larger process. The commissions, FTP processing, the reporting, the file moves to the business users — all that is right there. It's very easy to read. It's easy to tie it together, visually, and see where each of these steps fits into the bigger picture."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"Assets and logs are valuable."

"It was very simple to use and allowed us to easily record and manage activities."

"UiPath Orchestrator improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management."

"UiPath Orchestrator is considered the brain of the system."

"The platform serves as a valuable tool for orchestrating solutions within an organization."

"The centralized login feature greatly helps because we can also use the Active Directory feature. We do not need to create a new user. We can connect with a user from a company, and we can add all the groups they have to set the features for a specific group. We do not need to do that for each user, and we can do that for a specific role we have in the company. I think this helps a lot."

"UiPath Orchestrator is a user-friendly solution."

"The most beneficial feature is the queue system, which allows robots to process a large volume of data simultaneously."

More UiPath Orchestrator pros

Cons

"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."

"They have some crucial design flaws within the console that still need to be worked out because it is not working exactly how we hoped to see it, e.g., just some minor things where when you hit the save button, then all of a sudden all your job's library items collapse. Then, in order to continue on with your testing, you have to open those back up. I have taken that to them, and they are like, "Yep. We know about it. We know we have some enhancements that need to be taken care of. We have more developers now." They are working towards taking the minor things that annoy us, resolving them, and getting them fixed."

"One thing I've noticed is that navigation can be difficult unless you are familiar with the structure that we have in place. If someone else had to look at our ActiveBatch console and find a job, they might not know where to find it."

"The product should be improved by providing a customization option."

"They could provide an easier installation guide or technical support to the organizations during the installation process."

"Whenever there is an overload, we are seeing crashes happening."

"There is this back and forth, where ActiveBatch says, "Your Oracle people should be dealing with this," and Oracle people say, "No, we don't know anything about ActiveBatch." Then, it all falls back on me as to what happens. Nobody is taking responsibility. This is the biggest failing for ActiveBatch."

"Some improvements can be made to the user interface."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"UiPath Orchestrator is sometimes a bit clunky, and a few things don't work in the tool as they should."

"The vision libraries that the tool provides, along with the visualization part, are areas with shortcomings in the solution where improvements are required."

"The solution must provide more AI capabilities."

"There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities."

"The tool makes the laptops slow."

"The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI."

"Regarding licensing costs and setup costs, the pricing is on the higher side compared to other RPA solutions that are entering the market, which are much cheaper, and sometimes we cannot retain customers because of this."

"The solution's deployment and architecture aspects could be improved."

More UiPath Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"The tool's licensing cost is high. I rate the tool an eight or nine on a scale from one to ten, where ten means expensive."

"Larger organizations may benefit from more favorable pricing, as the costs can be distributed across more licenses."

"The pricing is quite reasonable, particularly with the cloud version where Orchestrator is included in all other licenses at no additional cost."

"The product is quite expensive."

"The solution's price is high. We have subscribed to 15 licenses which are paid on a yearly basis. We don't pay any additional costs for support and maintenance."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive."

"I rate UiPath Orchestrator's pricing a six out of ten."

"The product’s pricing is competitive."

More UiPath Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?

Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?

Regarding licensing costs and setup costs, the pricing is on the higher side compared to other RPA solutions that are entering the market, which are much cheaper, and sometimes we cannot retain cus...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?

In future updates of UiPath Orchestrator, I would want to see something that allows typing basic details of the workflow, which can then be used to design a text message workflow. As of now, almost...

See all answers

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 17% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 14% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Automic Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 43% of the time

Control-M vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 30% of the time

VMware Aria Automation Orchestrator vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 13% of the time

More UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

August 2025

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Orchestrator

July 2025

Download UiPath Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

ActiveBatch

No data available

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

UiPath Orchestrator offers a centralized platform for managing robotic process automation tasks, featuring advanced scheduling, integration capabilities, and robust monitoring to enhance workflow efficiency across environments.

UiPath Orchestrator provides a comprehensive suite of tools for automating workflows, centralizing data management, and ensuring security compliance. Known for its ease of use, it helps businesses schedule robots, handle reports, and monitor logs centrally. It facilitates task deployment across diverse environments, simplifies document understanding, process automation, and provides insights into bot activities. While installation and complexity are areas for improvement, Orchestrator remains integral in sectors like finance, telecom, and healthcare.

What features does UiPath Orchestrator provide?

User-Friendly Interface: Easier navigation and interaction for users.
Advanced Scheduling: Enables precise coordination of automation tasks.
Centralized Data Management: Streamlines data oversight and reporting.
Robust Monitoring: Effective tracking of automated processes.
Asset Management with Encryption: Ensures secure handling of resources.
Efficient Queue System: Manages task sequences and priorities effectively.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex automation tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates seamless connection with multiple applications.
AI-Enhanced Features: Offers advanced automation capabilities.
Flexibility: Supports dynamic deployment across different environments.

Organizations leverage UiPath Orchestrator for automating workflows such as website processes and supply chain management. In industries like finance and healthcare, it is used for provisioning and data entry. It provides a framework to configure machines, create templates, and manage resources, driving efficiency and innovation.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. UiPath Orchestrator

July 2025

Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. UiPath Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. UiPath Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.