ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Celigo Integration Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood
Ranking in Process Automation
7th
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Workload Automation (5th)
Celigo Integration Platform
Ranking in Process Automation
42nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (62nd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Celigo Integration Platform is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
Unique Categories:
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
2.6%
Workload Automation
1.5%
Business Process Management (BPM)
0.1%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
0.5%
 

Featured Reviews

Madhu Bk - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 18, 2023
Increase efficiency, saves time, and offers helpful alerts
ActiveBatch helped us to streamline our IT workflows and improve overall efficiency. It is the most essential tool in our Infrastructure now.  The best part of ActiceBatch is its user-friendly Interface, which feels easy to use even for a user with limited technical experience.  We can configure…
Use Celigo Integration Platform?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."
"It allows for lower operational overhead."
"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."
"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."
"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."
"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."
"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."
"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
792,031 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
28%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Retailer
7%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...
What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

ActiveBatch
Integrator.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital
docker, glassdoor, peloton, ringcentral, twilio, bluejeans, crossfit, arista, juniper
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, BMC and others in Process Automation. Updated: June 2024.
792,031 professionals have used our research since 2012.