We performed a comparison between Acronis Disaster Recovery and Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Our customers use Acronis Disaster Recovery for data backup."
"One key feature is it encrypts your data at rest which is really good."
"The backup and recovery options work flawlessly."
"The solution can be improved by including a load balancer."
"Performance-wise, it works efficiently for backup and recovery compared to other tools."
"Acronis Disaster Recovery has good scalability."
"The most valuable features of the product for me are its backup and recovery functionalities."
"Patch management, backup, and disaster recovery have been the solution's most valuable features for our data protection strategy."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ease of use."
"We haven't needed anyone to maintain or deploy the solution. The traditional Nutanix administrator can administer the solution."
"Hyper-convergence gives me the ability to patch my firmware, software, and hypervisors with a single click. That is extremely useful."
"It offers synchronous data replication, allowing us to sync our recovery data every hour and efficiently send applications to remote sites."
"The solution is stable."
"It is a very secure and scalable solution, and their support is also outstanding."
"They could provide pricing models considering the requirements of various countries and organizations."
"The product should improve compute points."
"The solution covers specific versions of Windows and Linux, and it would be good if other Linux versions or some special appliances could work in the Acronis Disaster Recovery environment."
"The cost is acceptable."
"I wish the Disaster Recovery system could do more, like integrating irregularity features and combining VLP functionalities."
"Acronis Disaster Recovery should provide software information wherein I can change my setup to collect more information."
"The documentation can be improved, this would have helped."
"In the future, I would like to see cross-platform support."
"The product is more costly than other platforms. The price could be better."
"The solution needs improvement in cost."
"For moving the data for DR, we are using Megaport. We are using a Megaport link between the data centers, so we have a third party for the site-to-site connectivity between the data centers. If such connectivity is available from the Nutanix side, it would be helpful for us."
"I think that Nutanix should support public clouds instead of the Nutanix data centers."
"They need better reporting on the environment."
"The pricing could be better."
More Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Acronis Disaster Recovery is ranked 10th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 10 reviews while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is ranked 3rd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 6 reviews. Acronis Disaster Recovery is rated 8.4, while Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Acronis Disaster Recovery writes "Easy to implement and provides good features like patch management and disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service writes "Affordable, highly scalable, and outstanding support". Acronis Disaster Recovery is most compared with Arcserve UDP, Azure Site Recovery and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service is most compared with Zerto, VMware SRM, Azure Site Recovery, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Acronis Disaster Recovery vs. Nutanix Disaster Recovery as a Service report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
