Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Citrix XenServer Logo

Top 10 Citrix XenServer Alternatives

Vendor: Citrix
4.1 out of 5
3,823 followers
Start review

Top Citrix XenServer Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Citrix XenServer based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, and Hyper-V. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Citrix XenServer surpasses its competitors by offering powerful virtualization solutions with robust management capabilities, superior performance, and advanced security features, making it an ideal choice for businesses seeking efficient and scalable virtual environments.

Citrix Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Citrix, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Citrix XenServer Logo
Proxmox VE
4.3 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
Proxmox VE
4.3 out of 5
Citrix XenServer offers advanced features like live migration and storage integration, catering to various user levels with a Windows management tool. In comparison, Proxmox VE is valued for its open-source flexibility, combining virtualization types with a web interface and cost-effectiveness.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. Proxmox VE Report
Citrix XenServer often incurs higher setup costs due to licensing fees, while Proxmox VE is more budget-friendly with its open-source model.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer often incurs higher setup costs due to licensing fees, while Proxmox VE is more budget-friendly with its open-source model.
Citrix XenServer Logo
VMware vSphere
4.4 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
VMware vSphere
4.4 out of 5
Citrix XenServer offers a cost-effective, open-source virtualization platform with features like live migration and active directory integration. In comparison, VMware vSphere provides a comprehensive suite including high availability and distributed resource scheduling, ideal for enterprises despite its higher cost and complex licensing.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. VMware vSphere Report
Citrix XenServer offers a lower setup cost, appealing for budget-conscious organizations, while VMware vSphere presents a higher initial investment justified by its robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer offers a lower setup cost, appealing for budget-conscious organizations, while VMware vSphere presents a higher initial investment justified by its robust features.
Citrix XenServer Logo
Hyper-V
4.0 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
Hyper-V
4.0 out of 5
Citrix XenServer offers flexibility with its open-source approach and useful management features. In comparison, Hyper-V provides seamless integration with Microsoft ecosystems, making it appealing for Windows environments. Citrix is ideal for those valuing open-source, while Hyper-V benefits from Microsoft tool compatibility.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. Hyper-V Report
Citrix XenServer has a higher setup cost than Hyper-V, which is known for its cost-efficient initialization. Citrix XenServer's premium features contribute to its price, while Hyper-V offers competitive pricing with essential capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer has a higher setup cost than Hyper-V, which is known for its cost-efficient initialization. Citrix XenServer's premium features contribute to its price, while Hyper-V offers competitive pricing with essential capabilities.
Citrix XenServer Logo
KVM
4.0 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
KVM
4.0 out of 5
Citrix XenServer offers user-friendly management convenient for less technical users with easy VM migration and active directory integration. In comparison, KVM attracts those familiar with Linux environments due to its flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing with its open-source nature and hardware compatibility.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. KVM Report
Citrix XenServer has a lower setup cost compared to KVM, making it a more economical choice for initial deployment. KVM's setup involves higher expenses, reflecting its comprehensive enterprise capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer has a lower setup cost compared to KVM, making it a more economical choice for initial deployment. KVM's setup involves higher expenses, reflecting its comprehensive enterprise capabilities.
Citrix XenServer Logo
Citrix XenServer Logo
Oracle VM VirtualBox
4.1 out of 5
Citrix XenServer provides a robust VDI solution with essential features and strong security, appealing for stable and scalable virtual desktop environments. In comparison, Oracle VM VirtualBox offers a versatile open-source platform suitable for smaller setups, praised for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox Report
Citrix XenServer involves higher setup costs with advanced management features, while Oracle VM VirtualBox offers a more affordable initial setup, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer involves higher setup costs with advanced management features, while Oracle VM VirtualBox offers a more affordable initial setup, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.
Citrix XenServer Logo
Red Hat OpenShift
4.2 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
Red Hat OpenShift
4.2 out of 5
Citrix XenServer offers high-performance virtualization with ease of setup, ideal for cost-effective on-premises solutions. In comparison, Red Hat OpenShift excels in container management and application deployment, making it suitable for cloud-native environments with robust CI/CD support.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report
Citrix XenServer is praised for its affordable setup costs, whereas Red Hat OpenShift is critiqued for higher initial expenses, creating a notable cost disparity between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer is praised for its affordable setup costs, whereas Red Hat OpenShift is critiqued for higher initial expenses, creating a notable cost disparity between the two platforms.
Citrix XenServer Logo
Citrix XenServer Logo
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
4.3 out of 5
Citrix XenServer provides ease of use for beginners, supporting diverse OS types with high availability, suitable for small budgets. In comparison, Nutanix AHV offers multi-cloud integration and advanced storage features, presenting long-term savings with its comprehensive management capabilities and no separate license requirements.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. Nutanix AHV Virtualization Report
Citrix XenServer setup costs are lower, making it more budget-friendly, while Nutanix AHV Virtualization involves higher initial expenses but offers extensive features supporting complex environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer setup costs are lower, making it more budget-friendly, while Nutanix AHV Virtualization involves higher initial expenses but offers extensive features supporting complex environments.
Citrix XenServer Logo
Oracle VM
4.0 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
Oracle VM
4.0 out of 5
Oracle VM focuses on Oracle Database compatibility and cost reduction, catering to Oracle-heavy environments. In comparison, Citrix XenServer offers a robust free version with innovative management tools. Oracle VM suits existing Oracle users, while Citrix is ideal for those seeking free yet powerful virtualization.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. Oracle VM Report
Oracle VM offers a lower setup cost compared to Citrix XenServer's higher initial expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle VM offers a lower setup cost compared to Citrix XenServer's higher initial expenditure.
Citrix XenServer Logo
RHEV
3.9 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
RHEV
3.9 out of 5
RHEV offers robust virtualization integrated with Red Hat's ecosystem appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Citrix XenServer provides advanced management, superior scalability, and support resources, suiting businesses targeting complex configurations. RHEV's pricing attracts budget focus, while Citrix XenServer's investment ensures advanced long-term capabilities.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. RHEV Report
RHEV requires lower setup costs, making it cost-effective for small businesses, while Citrix XenServer offers advanced features with higher initial expenses, suitable for larger enterprises seeking robust virtualization solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
RHEV requires lower setup costs, making it cost-effective for small businesses, while Citrix XenServer offers advanced features with higher initial expenses, suitable for larger enterprises seeking robust virtualization solutions.
Citrix XenServer Logo
IBM PowerVM
4.3 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
IBM PowerVM
4.3 out of 5
IBM PowerVM is renowned for its robust security, stability, and flexibility in resource management. In comparison, Citrix XenServer is praised for its open-source benefits and real-time performance monitoring. PowerVM suits diverse operating systems, while XenServer appeals to Windows compatibility and affordability for SMBs.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. IBM PowerVM Report
IBM PowerVM requires a higher setup cost compared to Citrix XenServer, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense. This significant pricing difference is a key factor for businesses evaluating virtualization solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM PowerVM requires a higher setup cost compared to Citrix XenServer, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense. This significant pricing difference is a key factor for businesses evaluating virtualization solutions.
Citrix XenServer Logo
Citrix XenServer Logo
XCP-ng virtualization platform
1 out of 5
Citrix XenServer offers extensive support and enterprise-grade features, making it suitable for large organizations prioritizing comprehensive service. In comparison, XCP-ng's open-source model and cost-effectiveness attract those who value flexibility, community-driven improvements, and lower initial investment.
Citrix XenServer involves higher setup costs, while XCP-ng is known for lower initial expenses. XenServer offers robust features, but XCP-ng is more budget-friendly for entry-level virtualization.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer involves higher setup costs, while XCP-ng is known for lower initial expenses. XenServer offers robust features, but XCP-ng is more budget-friendly for entry-level virtualization.
Citrix XenServer Logo
VMware ESXi
4.2 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
VMware ESXi
4.2 out of 5
Citrix XenServer offers a free, easy-to-install virtualization platform with advanced features like VM migration. In comparison, VMware ESXi focuses on reliability and enterprise features, despite high costs. Citrix suits budget-conscious setups, while VMware attracts enterprises with strong performance needs.
Download Citrix XenServer vs. VMware ESXi Report
Citrix XenServer offers a lower initial setup cost, while VMware ESXi typically requires a higher investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer offers a lower initial setup cost, while VMware ESXi typically requires a higher investment for setup.
Citrix XenServer Logo
Xen Project
1 out of 5
Citrix XenServer Logo
Xen Project
1 out of 5
Citrix XenServer delivers enterprise-ready features and robust support, attracting those seeking a streamlined experience. In comparison, Xen Project's open-source nature and modularity appeal to those desiring customization, although it demands more technical skill and manual setup, potentially reducing initial costs.
Citrix XenServer has a straightforward setup cost, while Xen Project offers flexibility with its open-source nature and potentially lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Citrix XenServer has a straightforward setup cost, while Xen Project offers flexibility with its open-source nature and potentially lower initial expenses.

Related categories

Server Virtualization Software
PaaS Clouds
Container Management