Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Citrix XenServer vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Citrix and Red Hat are both solutions in the Server Virtualization Software category. Citrix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.5, while Red Hat is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Citrix holds a 4.9% mindshare in SVS, compared to Red Hat’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Citrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
Citrix XenServer
Read 52 Citrix XenServer reviews
  • 6,908 Views
  • 5,260 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Red Hat OpenShift
Read 62 Red Hat OpenShift reviews
  • 837 Views
  • 730 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on May 13, 2025

Citrix XenServer and Red Hat OpenShift compete in the virtualization and orchestration solution category, each targeting different client needs. Red Hat OpenShift takes the upper hand with its comprehensive Kubernetes-based orchestration, multi-cloud support, and enhanced security features.

Features: Citrix XenServer provides a free virtualization suite with high performance and scalability, particularly valuable for Windows server environments. It offers XenMotion for seamless migration and supports unlimited virtual machines. OpenShift, on the other hand, is known for its robust Kubernetes integration, offering advanced security, container management, and multi-cloud flexibility. It simplifies container orchestration and enhances DevOps processes, making it a preferred choice for cloud-native applications.

Room for Improvement: XenServer could benefit from broader Linux support, a web-based management interface, and improved third-party integrations. These enhancements would expand its appeal beyond Windows-centric environments. OpenShift requires better documentation, a simpler initial setup process, and more support for legacy applications. Improved autoscaling and integration with diverse vendor solutions are also noted for future development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: XenServer is predominantly deployed on-premises, emphasizing enterprise control but relying heavily on an effective tier 1 support filter, which leads to mixed results. OpenShift offers flexibility with on-premises and cloud deployments and is well-regarded for its thorough customer support, although licensing complexities can impede the process.

Pricing and ROI: Citrix XenServer appeals with its cost-effective model, especially beneficial for small to medium enterprises due to options for free use. Its ROI is attributed to reduced infrastructure and operational expenses. OpenShift is considered more costly but offers extensive support and comprehensive cloud services, providing significant operational efficiencies and scalability benefits when strategically deployed.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Citrix XenServer vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer vs. Red Hat OpenShift
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Citrix XenServer offers cost savings and enhanced efficiency through virtualization, justifying the investment despite higher initial costs.
Sentiment score
7.8
Red Hat OpenShift improves productivity, offers cost savings, enhances system stability, and provides 15% ROI, especially in privacy-focused sectors.
My clients generally maintain their Citrix infrastructure without shifting, suggesting stability and reliable operation as Citrix XenServer is fully established.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
With OpenShift combined with IBM Cloud App integration, I can spin an integration server in a second as compared to traditional methods, which could take days or weeks.
Moving to OpenShift resulted in increased system stability and reduced downtime, which contributed to operational efficiency.
It is always advisable to get the bare minimum that you need, and then add more when necessary.
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat OpenShift report
Tonatiuh Torres Zamorano - PeerSpot reviewerMikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
JU
Pratul Shukla - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.8
Citrix XenServer's customer service varies in effectiveness, with challenges in response times and support access, especially for complex issues.
Sentiment score
6.8
Red Hat OpenShift support is mixed, praised for expertise but criticized for slow responses and varying experiences based on subscription.
With valid licenses, we can access hotfixes, service packs, knowledge base, self-help tools, diagnostics, downloads, live chat, and phone support.
They do not provide adequate support for midsize businesses.
There appear to be very few engineers at Citrix who understand the problems.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
Red Hat's technical support is responsive and effective.
I have been pretty happy in the past with getting support from Red Hat.
Red Hat's technical support is good, and I would rate it a nine out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat OpenShift report
SP
Filip Fronczak - PeerSpot reviewerVivekKumar10 - PeerSpot reviewer
JU
UM
AJ
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Citrix XenServer offers effective scalability and integration, appreciated for its ease, cost-effectiveness, and support for enterprise growth.
Sentiment score
7.5
Red Hat OpenShift offers efficient scalability with automated features, easy deployment, and adaptability, despite cost and infrastructure considerations.
Familiarity with Linux can enhance its performance and usability.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
The on-demand provisioning of pods and auto-scaling, whether horizontal or vertical, is the best part.
OpenShift's horizontal pod scaling is more effective and efficient than that used in Kubernetes, making it a superior choice for scalability.
Red Hat OpenShift scales excellently, with a rating of ten out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat OpenShift report
Tonatiuh Torres Zamorano - PeerSpot reviewer
UM
Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
SA
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Citrix XenServer is reliable for SMBs, supports high uptimes, but may occasionally face minor issues, especially with backups.
Sentiment score
7.7
Red Hat OpenShift is praised for stability, reliability, and features like Blue-Green deployment, with minor issues quickly resolved.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
It provides better performance yet requires more resources compared to vanilla Kubernetes.
I've had my cluster running for over four years.
It performs well under load, providing the desired output.
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat OpenShift report
Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
JU
SA
 

Room For Improvement

Citrix XenServer needs better backup, integration, management, stability, compatibility, affordability, technical support, community engagement, and marketing.
Red Hat OpenShift needs better documentation, improved usability, and enhancements in security, integration, technical support, and installation processes.
Although the product is technically competitive, it is not widely known or used due to poor marketing.
Citrix needs to improve the hypervisor, specifically in security and performance.
We can implement high availability and live migration with pools, along with security and backup to enable role-based access control for safer management.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
Learning OpenShift requires complex infrastructure, needing vCenter integration, more advanced answers, active directory, and more expensive hardware.
Red Hat OpenShift's biggest disadvantage is they do not provide any private cloud setup where we can host on our site using their services.
We should aim to include VMware-like capabilities to be competitive, especially considering cost factors.
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat OpenShift report
Filip Fronczak - PeerSpot reviewerTonatiuh Torres Zamorano - PeerSpot reviewer
SP
Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewerPratul Shukla - PeerSpot reviewer
SA
 

Setup Cost

Citrix XenServer is a cost-effective alternative to VMware, though pricing can be complex and varies with needs.
Red Hat OpenShift pricing is high but potentially cost-effective for large enterprises, offering comprehensive support and enterprise capabilities.
It is cheaper compared to its competitors.
Organizations save substantial money because competing solutions, such as VMware, cost double or triple.
The pricing and licensing policy of Citrix XenServer is not transparent and quite confusing.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
Initially, licensing was per CPU, with a memory cap, but the price has doubled, making it difficult to justify for clients with smaller compute needs.
Red Hat can improve on the pricing part by making it more flexible and possibly on the lower side.
The cost of OpenShift is very high, particularly with the OpenShift Plus package, which includes many products and services.
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat OpenShift report
Tonatiuh Torres Zamorano - PeerSpot reviewerVivekKumar10 - PeerSpot reviewerFilip Fronczak - PeerSpot reviewer
AJ
UM
Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Valuable Features

Citrix XenServer offers virtualization, ease of use, scalability, and strong support, ideal for small to medium businesses.
Red Hat OpenShift is valued for its security, scalability, automation, multi-cloud flexibility, and efficient management interface.
The most valuable feature is transferring and sharing applications that allow users to move files between devices, including smartphones, tablets, and computers without needing USB cables, internet connections, or data usage.
It provides secure access to applications and resources, which is crucial for us and our clients.
It is user-friendly and easy to deploy, making it an attractive option.
For more quotes and insights, download the Citrix XenServer report
Because it was centrally managed in our company, many metrics that we had to write code for were available out of the box, including utilization, CPU utilization, memory, and similar metrics.
The concept of containers and scaling on demand is a feature I appreciate the most about Red Hat OpenShift.
A valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift is its ability to handle increased loads by automatically adding nodes.
For more quotes and insights, download the Red Hat OpenShift report
SP
Filip Fronczak - PeerSpot reviewerTonatiuh Torres Zamorano - PeerSpot reviewerPratul Shukla - PeerSpot reviewer
UM
SA
 

Categories and Ranking

Citrix XenServer
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat OpenShift
Ranking in Server Virtualization Software
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (3rd), Container Management (12th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (6th), Agile and DevOps Services (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Server Virtualization Software category, the mindshare of Citrix XenServer is 4.9%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 1.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Server Virtualization Software
 

Featured Reviews

VivekKumar10 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cost efficiency enables significant savings but improvement in support and backup integration is needed for enhanced reliability
In the past, we utilized the live migration feature in Citrix XenServer, but not in this project. This is a new, fresh deployment, so there is no live migration. The support of heterogeneous resource pool in Citrix XenServer depends on the deployment and customer requirements. If a customer requires heterogeneous deployment, we accommodate that. Generally, Citrix XenServer goes in straightforward vanilla deployment because it is majorly used for Citrix farms. Very few customers use it for other products or applications. Intelligent performance optimization is available in this product, but very few customers use it, and those who do aren't using it extensively. I cannot comment extensively on this feature at present.
Read full review
Pratul Shukla - PeerSpot reviewer
Adopting a flexible and efficient approach with noticeable improvements in operational costs and continued challenges in job management
Currently, one of the biggest challenges we face is with services and jobs. For spawning batches, although it has crons, it is not easy to integrate with enterprise systems such as Autosys. The entire company uses Autosys, but we are not able to integrate it effectively. We need intermediate servers to run OC utility commands and initiate the cron job. We have to do a lot of modifications to ensure our batches work properly. With physical or virtual servers, even in AWS, we are able to write and manage multiple jobs. Managing batches in Red Hat OpenShift has been a significant challenge. Integrating third parties is a challenge with Red Hat OpenShift. For example, with Elasticsearch, onboarding itself was difficult, running file beats and dealing with routing issues. It is not straightforward, especially since we have some components in AWS as. AWS has many capabilities that come out of the box and are easier to work with compared to Red Hat OpenShift. Red Hat OpenShift's biggest disadvantage is they do not provide any private cloud setup where we can host on our site using their services. The main reason we went with Red Hat OpenShift was because it is a private cloud, and we have regulatory requirements that prevent us from using public cloud.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VL
Jan 13, 2015
vSphere vs. RHEV vs. Hyper-V vs. XenServer
We have used the following functions: 1. Hypervisor: to ensure that the virtual server provide web and email services to the company, thus providing a stable operation a with single sign-on integration of an AD server and vCenter. 2. Network and Storage: centralized data server…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
30%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Hypervisor?
The core function enables multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server. This maximizes hardware utilization and efficiency.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Hypervisor?
Citrix XenServer multi-cloud includes all necessary products, allowing for a diverse deployment. Licensing includes all the server courses, Unicom, and features from Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktop...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Citrix Hypervisor?
Citrix XenServer needs to improve compatibility with other solutions and support various services hosted on it. There's also a need for more companies supporting backups for Citrix XenServer as a h...
See all answers
How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
See all answers
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
See all answers
What do you like most about OpenShift?
OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Proxmox VE vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 32% of the time
VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer Logo
VMware vSphere vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 21% of the time
Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Hyper-V vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 18% of the time
Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Nutanix AHV Virtualization vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 8% of the time
Oracle VM vs Citrix XenServer Logo
Oracle VM vs Citrix XenServer
Compared 1% of the time
More Citrix XenServer Competitors
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift Logo
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift
Compared 16% of the time
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Red Hat OpenShift Logo
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Red Hat OpenShift
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift Logo
Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift
Compared 13% of the time
Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift Logo
Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift
Compared 8% of the time
Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift Logo
Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift
Compared 7% of the time
More Red Hat OpenShift Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer
June 2025
Citrix XenServer reportDownload Citrix XenServer product report
Buyer's Guide
Red Hat OpenShift
May 2025
Red Hat OpenShift reportDownload Red Hat OpenShift product report
 

Also Known As

Hypervisor
No data available
 

Overview

Citrix XenServer provides virtualization with high availability and robust security, offering seamless VM migration and centralized management through XenCenter. Its expansive compatibility and integration enhance its appeal, particularly for SMBs.

Citrix XenServer is recognized for its user-friendly virtualization capabilities, facilitating dynamic scalability and efficient resource management. It supports a wide range of operating systems and integrates with Citrix solutions for improved operations. Businesses benefit from its affordability and ease of deployment. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements in third-party tool integration, network and backup management, and storage flexibility. High costs, limited Linux support, system complexity, technical support, and hardware compatibility remain challenges. An updated and intuitive interface is in demand for more seamless operations across platforms.

What are the key features of Citrix XenServer?
  • User-Friendly Virtualization: Simplifies virtualization operations with efficient management tools.
  • High Availability: Ensures continuous access to virtualized resources.
  • Robust Security: Protects virtual environments with comprehensive security protocols.
  • Seamless VM Migration: Facilitates easy migration of virtual machines across environments.
  • Centralized Management: XenCenter provides centralized control for resource management.
  • Dynamic Scalability: Supports scaling of resources as per business requirements.
  • Real-Time Performance Monitoring: Enables monitoring and optimizing of system performance actively.
  • Unlimited Virtual Machines: Offers the capacity for deploying numerous virtual machines without limitations.
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
  • Cost Efficiency: Competitive pricing model reduces virtualization costs.
  • Comprehensive Virtualization: Complete solution for desktop and server virtualization needs.
  • Ease of Deployment: Quick and straightforward setup process minimizes downtime.
  • Integration with Citrix Solutions: Enhances functionality with existing Citrix technologies.

In diverse industries, Citrix XenServer is leveraged for server and desktop virtualization, cloud automation, and infrastructure management. Many deploy it for virtual desktop infrastructure, application delivery, on-premises data centers, and to support Citrix application delivery like XenApp and XenDesktop. Enterprises migrating from VMware often find Citrix XenServer cost-efficient for these applications, serving as a main computing platform for enterprise applications including ERP systems and SQL Servers.

Citrix

Red Hat OpenShift offers a robust, scalable platform with strong security and automation, suitable for container orchestration, application deployment, and microservices architecture.

Designed to modernize applications by transitioning from legacy systems to cloud-native environments, Red Hat OpenShift provides powerful CI/CD integration and Kubernetes compatibility. Its security features, multi-cloud support, and source-to-image functionality enhance deployment flexibility. While the GUI offers user-friendly navigation, users benefit from its cloud-agnostic nature and efficient lifecycle management. However, improvements are needed in documentation, configuration complexity, and integration with third-party platforms. Pricing and high resource demands can also be challenging for wider adoption.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift?
  • Security: Comprehensive security features ensure safe deployments and operations.
  • Scalability: Auto-scaling and monitoring capabilities cater to high-demand environments.
  • CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration for efficient continuous deployment processes.
  • Cloud Compatibility: Supports multi-cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
  • GUI: Simplifies platform management and enhances usability.
What benefits and ROI should users look for?
  • Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations reduce time and resource investments.
  • Enhanced Flexibility: Adapt quickly to changing demands and environments.
  • Quick Deployment: Fast application deployment supports agile project timelines.
  • Robust Support: Access to dependable customer support services.

Red Hat OpenShift is strategically implemented for diverse industries focusing on container orchestration and application modernization. Organizations leverage it for migrating applications to cloud-native environments and managing CI/CD pipelines. Its functionality facilitates efficient resource management and microservices architecture adoption, supporting enterprise-level DevOps practices. Users employ it across cloud and on-premises platforms to drive performance improvements.

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

U.S. Army Shared Services Center, SoftLayer, Educational Services of America, Independent Bank, and SK Telecom.
UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Buyer's Guide
Citrix XenServer vs. Red Hat OpenShift
June 2025
Free Report: Citrix XenServer vs. Red Hat OpenShift
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix XenServer vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Citrix XenServer vs. Red Hat OpenShift report.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.