Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] Logo

Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.0 out of 5

What is Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]?

Featured Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] reviews

 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

 

Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] reviews

Sort by:
Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque - PeerSpot user
Enterprise Solutions & Services Head at Duroob Technologies
Verified user of Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]
Mar 11, 2024
An automation solution to automate the entire release process but lacks development

Pros

"Its extensive range of available connectors eliminates the need for manual code writing when implementing solutions, thus reducing coding efforts. "

Cons

"The product's development has been stopped. It focuses on maintaining existing products."
SL
Principal Engineer - IT Quality and Release at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]
Aug 30, 2018
Ability to automate release deployments reduces deployment time

Pros

"Its ability to automate release deployments, streamline release scope, and reduce the cost of and time for deployment. "

Cons

"CDD and RA should be two modules in the same product. They do not automatically “talk” to each other. and they require endpoint definition."
Find out what your peers are saying about Release Automation. Updated May 2025
852,098 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
DevOps Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]
Dec 30, 2018
Enables us to easily design a pipeline to promote applications from development to production

Pros

"The most valuable feature for me is the fact that you can easily design a pipeline to promote applications from a development environment up to a production environment, and the team can become autonomous in designing those pipelines."

Cons

"We have rolled out the SAFe model, but what we would like to have is better integration with Agile Central, for instance, or at least at the plugin level, where we would select only certain stories instead of many stories in the sprint."
MH
Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]
May 17, 2023
Useful UI, highly stable, and flexible subscription

Pros

"The most valuable features of Automic Continuous Delivery Director are the UI, release planning, and tracking, and you can do your soft and hard freeze through CDP."

Cons

"Automic Continuous Delivery Director can improve the integrations. We have 25 but would like more."
PeerSpot user
ALM DevOps Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Verified user of Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]
Oct 5, 2018
Enables multiple stakeholders to coordinate software delivery across multiple environments

Cons

"Reporting and dashboarding could be improved. Release pipelines should be creatable via templates as well as easily integrable/chained together. Visual navigation could also be improved when the pipelines become too large."