Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] vs GitLab comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and GitLab are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 80% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of GitLab users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 5 Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] reviews

80% willing to recommend

GitLab

Read 91 GitLab reviews

26,574 Views
9,567 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

GitLab

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] and GitLab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,056 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitLab

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Build Automation (3rd), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (5th), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (4th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Featured Reviews

Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque

Group CEO at Flexsolutions

An automation solution to automate the entire release process but lacks development

Automic eliminates a lot of error mishandling. If implemented, it can save a significant amount of money. It requires a substantial investment upfront because it eliminates the need for manual intervention in each process or job. Essentially, an operator oversees the releases, ensuring they are ready for release without needing to understand the intricacies of the process. This streamlines the release process and allows for monitoring at every step, reducing manual errors and providing automation, as the name "Automic" suggests. Automic offers a wide range of out-of-the-box integrations, available through its marketplace. This includes monitoring tools, release processes, and various other tools, making it a comprehensive solution.

Read full review

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Role-based workflows have transformed daily deployments and improve team collaboration

GitLab has role-based access control, so when a team member needs to make a code change, they cannot directly apply it to the environment but must put in a merge request. Once a senior reviews the code and approves it, then it is implemented across the environment, making it safer and allowing everyone to experience the process. The best features GitLab offers are version control and automation, which are the major things that stand out to me. When it comes to access, the login is very smooth, with just one login integrated with our Okta, allowing everyone to log in easily. Deployments become much easier, and that is how GitLab helps. The automation features make my work easier because we use a tool called AWX, which is connected to GitLab. Whenever we run a job on AWX, it directly checks the code and uses it. Since the code is not preserved locally but kept in the cloud, it is safe and nobody can tamper with it. When it comes to safety, that is a major thing. Automation features allow the code to be accessed from any tools we use, so the jobs we run are helping tremendously and doing their work perfectly. For pipeline tasks, we have created a significant amount of pipelines, which are all hosted in GitLab. Running the pipelines has become much easier, and they are doing a perfect job, helping tremendously in our day-to-day activities. GitLab has positively impacted my organization because previously we stored code locally on servers, leading to many risks. Since GitLab came into our environment, our integration and deployments became much easier, helping our work become much smoother. Improvements from GitLab have led to better team collaboration because when several people are working, they can all edit the code and submit it as a merge request, and once approved, it reflects directly to the main branch. Many can work at the same time. When it comes to deployments, deploying has become much faster since we started using GitLab, and even if errors occur, we can spot them easily and troubleshoot, which has helped tremendously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's the simplicity; it's very simple to use and deploy and deliver, and it works."

"The most valuable feature is the thorough coordination of software delivery across multiple environments, where multiple actors (typically business stakeholders, devs and ops engineers, release engineers, testers, and change managers) can easily cooperate to ensure a proper and repeatable delivery by combining constant follow-up on manual and automated activities."

"Its ability to automate release deployments, streamline release scope, and reduce the cost of and time for deployment."

"Its extensive range of available connectors eliminates the need for manual code writing when implementing solutions, thus reducing coding efforts."

"The second valuable aspect is its capability to drive external systems like deployment automation engines or to integrate with Agile Central."

"CDD is primarily used for showing end users (managers, business teams, project managers, and release managers) what is happening with each release. The status and reporting features are very important. Automation reduces time to deploy. It also allows us to do more with releases and testing prior to production, better guaranteeing a smooth deployment."

"The most valuable feature for me is the fact that you can easily design a pipeline to promote applications from a development environment up to a production environment, and the team can become autonomous in designing those pipelines."

"The most valuable features of Automic Continuous Delivery Director are the UI, release planning, and tracking, and you can do your soft and hard freeze through CDP."

"GitLab integrates well with other platforms."

"Continuous integration with deployment is very powerful, which is a significant reason for migrating from TFS to GitLab."

"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution's most valuable features are pipelines."

"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."

"The code merging capability is something that we use very frequently."

"My advice for others looking into this product is to go for it; GitLab is the future."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"We would like to have a more user-friendly interface. It is already very friendly, but as soon as you start to have many applications with many tasks, the applications should be easier to manipulate on the screen."

"Automic Continuous Delivery Director can improve the integrations. We have 25 but would like more."

"Unfortunately, today in CDD, we don't have that capacity to integrate the testing yet."

"Reporting and dashboarding could be improved. Release pipelines should be creatable via templates as well as easily integrable/chained together. Visual navigation could also be improved when the pipelines become too large."

"CDD and RA should be two modules in the same product. They do not automatically “talk” to each other. and they require endpoint definition."

"We have rolled out the SAFe model, but what we would like to have is better integration with Agile Central, for instance, or at least at the plugin level, where we would select only certain stories instead of many stories in the sprint."

"The product's development has been stopped. It focuses on maintaining existing products."

"As a partner, sometimes it's difficult to get support. They have a really complicated procedure for their support."

"The solution could be faster."

"The technology could be made simpler to use, it should not be overly complex."

"In my experience, GitLab is stable; however, sometimes it takes much time to start the runner and gets stuck in a pending situation, possibly due to traffic issues."

"The initial setup was quite challenging because it takes some time to understand how to pull out or push the code."

"We'd like to see better integration with the Atlassian ecosystem. There needs to be better and native integration."

"GitLab is not responding quickly enough to our request. Technical support could be better and their response time needs improvement to respond more quickly."

"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free trial available that people can try. The solution has a subscription and it is based on the users that use the solution."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"This is an open-source solution."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"The price is okay."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,056 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

35%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The setup cost for GitLab is minimal since the team has its own minimal resource balancing. The costing falls into an intermediate stage and is impactful across all results within the team. It allo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

There are many improvements that GitLab can implement, such as addressing the issue of caching. Currently, when I have multiple tasks to merge or attempt multiple merges, the CI/CD and overall GitL...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitLab?

My main use case for GitLab is as a version control system that we are using. Currently, I am working on an end-to-end AI pipeline, and I have deployed my whole code using GitLab so that all things...

See all answers

Comparisons

Arcad DROPS vs Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]

Compared 26% of the time

Digital.ai Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]

Compared 22% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 29% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Jenkins vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

Veracode vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

October 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

September 2026

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

CA CDD, CA Continuous Delivery Director

Fuzzit

Overview

CA Continuous Delivery Director is a powerful pipeline planning, orchestration and analytics solution that enables teams to eliminate spreadsheets, automate test processes and continually improve the delivery of revenue-generating features to end customers. The solution works with the most popular commercial and open source DevOps solutions to orchestrate the pipeline from planning through production. It is also the core of the continuous delivery ecosystem from CA, which includes development, testing and deployment solutions. CA Continuous Delivery Director enables effortless continuous delivery of high-quality, innovative applications from high-performance, collaborative teams.

Broadcom

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

Sample Customers

United Airlines

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,056 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.