![Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab | 4.2 | 29.7% | 97% | 91 interviewsAdd to research |
| Microsoft Azure DevOps | 4.1 | 30.7% | 95% | 137 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.
Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] was previously known as CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform.
BET365, Charter Communications, TASC
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.0 | I find Automic excellent for complex enterprise deployments and flexible workflows. Despite its complex initial setup and stability issues, including data loss, and my customers' concerns about its high price, I rate it 8/10. |
| Project Manager at a financial services firm | 4.0 | I primarily use it for job run file transfers, appreciating the agents and event monitor. However, file transfers are slow and resource-intensive, and setup is complex. I'd rate it higher with faster transfers and easier installation. |
| IT Process Automation Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | I find Automic Continuous Delivery Automation great for web service deployment, especially its IT process automation. It's stable, scalable, and has good support. However, the new user interface needs improvement. I rate it 7/10. |
| Enterprise Architect at SPAR Business Service GmbH | 4.0 | This umbrella system integrates well into our environment, providing stable releases and excellent support. We've seen significant stability improvements. Cloud integration, especially Google Cloud, would be beneficial. |
| Administrator at a recruiting/HR firm with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | We use Automic Release Automation for deployments but encounter stability issues and terrible technical support for technical problems. User management needs significant improvement. I would recommend Automic Workload Automation for better flexibility. |
| Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees | No summary available | |
| IT Technician at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I absolutely recommend this stable, scalable product. Its key feature is showing resolved deployment problems, improving reporting. While initial setup is complex, I hope to integrate CD Directives to unify release management. |
| Managing Partner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | This product greatly boosted our bank's release frequency and efficiency through reliable, self-service deployments. My only suggestion is to enhance the dashboard to display package states across the entire application platform. |
![GitLab vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/WpxktyJQ456REi1ECfLL2n8d.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/GqfBeX9zWxZG3rC5hyrUo9Aq.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/9pv58sxiauagk0b37vs2fjbq5dbq.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/yq4AkUBxN1r2iKWsE66CeUuu.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/vrgt1zpi8gqi3wy9lt9smu963yx9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Nolio Release Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Plutora vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/QB8bBFx3aYMhyczww1UFNxxJ.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/ecwtjjlwilx2g4qujp0d5nz7cwsn.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}