Red Hat Ceph Storage Reviews

Name: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Brand: Red Hat
Rating: 4.2 (27 reviews)

Vendor: Red Hat

4.2 out of 5

27 reviews
82% willing to recommend

2,557 followers

Start review

What is Red Hat Ceph Storage?

Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.

Get the Software Defined Storage (SDS) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) and more!

Red Hat Ceph Storage is the #1 ranked solution in top File and Object Storage solutions and #2 ranked solution in top Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions. PeerSpot users give Red Hat Ceph Storage an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Red Hat Ceph Storage is most commonly compared to MinIO: Red Hat Ceph Storage vs MinIO. Red Hat Ceph Storage is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 59% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 18% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

May 2025

Get the category report

Helped 853,960 peers since 2012

Featured Red Hat Ceph Storage reviews

ANDRE VINICIUS HAMERSKI

IT Private Cloud & Infrastructure Leader at Sicredi

Ceph Storage allows us to add value related to cost and offers a unique experience compared to traditional storage. We appreciate the scalability of the open-source solution, allowing us to address our growing data needs without encountering major issues. Having used it as a pilot system in Brazil, we gained significant knowledge and the ability to manage our infrastructure as code.

Read full review

Rifat Rahman

Infrastructure Architect & CEO at Tirzok Private Limited

In terms of features, I found the most valuable functions of Red Hat Ceph Storage to be limited because I didn't work with the OEM product; I worked with the open source version of it. When it comes to the capabilities of Red Hat Ceph Storage such as object, block, and file storage, I am not fully satisfied. For the synchronous nature of Ceph, I naturally avoid its object storage scenarios and prefer OpenStack Swift for this purpose. This is a personal choice, not based on benchmarking. I tested both and found flexibility with Swift. But Red Hat Ceph Storage is also fine, without issues. I generally prefer Swift because I want to separate my backup storage from the primary storage. For OpenShift or other Kubernetes cases, Red Hat Ceph Storage is fine, and Radosgw is fine, without issues. From my experience, the main benefit Red Hat Ceph Storage can provide to users is its performance and availability along with fault tolerance.

Read full review

Soner BÜYÜKATALAY

Chief Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

We use the product for archive storage, video surveillance systems, and media storage Red Hat Ceph Storage is difficult to maintain. We use CLI tools for maintenance, and the concept seems challenging. Additionally, it is difficult to expand the product due to balancing errors. It takes some time…

Read full review

Red Hat Ceph Storage mindshare

Product category:

As of June 2025, the mindshare of Red Hat Ceph Storage in the Software Defined Storage (SDS) category stands at 20.7%, down from 22.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Defined Storage (SDS)

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Jun 3, 2025

Valuable Features

Red Hat Ceph Storage's most valuable features include open-source flexibility, adaptability with varied hardware, seamless integration, and self-healing capabilities. It offers high reliability, scalability, and cost efficiency. Users appreciate its data redundancy, distributed storage capabilities, and robust performance. Its ability to deliver block and object storage from the same cluster and integration with OpenStack is highlighted as essential. The platform is noted for being cloud-native and offering a comprehensive storage experience without traditional SAN components.

"I can compare Red Hat Ceph Storage with products from other vendors; I explored quite a few, but I still find that Red Hat Ceph Storage is making the most disruption."
"Stratus allows more reliability than all the other types of computers available."
"The setup is very easy, deserving a ten out of ten."

Room for Improvement

Red Hat Ceph Storage experiences performance and stability challenges during recovery and network failures. Its documentation and guides often lack completeness leading to installation difficulties. Users find the user interface requires enhancements for easier management. Georeplication features, RDMA support, and storage capacity also require attention. The software's integration with other solutions is complicated, causing operational difficulties. High resource consumption, complicated maintenance processes, and complex installation procedures highlight areas needing development.

"When it comes to the capabilities of Red Hat Ceph Storage such as object, block, and file storage, I am not fully satisfied."
"Areas of Red Hat Ceph Storage that have room for improvement include more promotion. Many people do not know about the Stratus case, which is one of the most reliable systems available in the world, but they are not aware that a system can keep working even if there is a hardware failure."
"If troubleshooting is needed, the response should be faster."

Pricing

Red Hat Ceph Storage pricing varies based on organizational expertise. It can be bundled with OpenStack or acquired as open-source, reducing costs to potential support fees. Users often find the price reasonable, though some see it as expensive compared to traditional solutions. Licensing typically involves storage capacity, such as two hundred terabytes. Many note affordability, while others stress testing Ceph independently if costs are prohibitive.

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
"The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."
"The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."

Popular Use Cases

Red Hat Ceph Storage is primarily utilized for integration with cloud systems like OpenStack, OpenShift, and Kubernetes. Organizations commonly deploy it for cloud and block storage, virtualization, and as a backend for container platforms. It serves various applications such as media storage, archive, and surveillance. Emphasized for its reliability, it is favored by those leveraging hyperconverged systems and using automation in environments with Supermicro and Dell servers.

Service and Support

Customers generally find Red Hat’s technical support valuable but often rely on community resources and forums. Some report ineffective experiences with email communication. Support is responsive and knowledgeable for those who use it, but many prefer self-solving via available online information. While Red Hat support provides a helpful portal and phone options, several avoid using it, rating the service between seven and eight out of ten.

Deployment

Initial setup experiences vary. Many find Red Hat Ceph Storage straightforward, especially with ceph-deploy or automation tools, while others consider it complex due to its distributed nature. Understanding Ceph technology, preparing infrastructure, and managing OSDS and networking are crucial. Setup duration ranges from an hour to several days, depending on infrastructure. Adequate documentation aids deployment. Industry experts note the significance of SSD and networking speeds for optimal performance. Technical support might be necessary for deeper customization.

Scalability

Red Hat Ceph Storage exhibits strong scalability capabilities, enabling seamless expansion without significant issues. Organizations have successfully scaled by adding nodes or disks, although careful planning and configuration are required. It can scale to large capacities, meeting users' needs effectively. Concerns regarding latency and hardware considerations exist, but users rate scalability favorably. Some users report satisfactory scaling for growing data needs, though challenges may arise with specific configurations like erasure coding.

Stability

Red Hat Ceph Storage has a strong reputation for reliability, with most users experiencing satisfactory stability in normal environments. Many note its steadiness compared to proprietary offerings. However, challenges arise when expanding or altering default configurations, such as the replication factor. Users report that in production, its stability proves dependable, achieving retention across installations without catastrophic failures. Performance impacts from certain actions like recovery are mentioned, but generally, users express confidence in its stability.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Software Defined Storage (SDS) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.