PyCharm Reviews

Name: PyCharm
Brand: JetBrains
Rating: 4.3 (13 reviews)

4.3 out of 5

13 reviews
100% willing to recommend

What is PyCharm?

Be More Productive
Save time while PyCharm takes care of the routine. Focus on the bigger things and embrace the keyboard-centric approach to get the most of PyCharm's many productivity features.

Get the Static Code Analysis Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about PyCharm, OpenText Static Application Security Testing and more!

PyCharm is the #8 ranked solution in top Static Code Analysis solutions. PeerSpot users give PyCharm an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. PyCharm is most commonly compared to OpenText Static Application Security Testing: PyCharm vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing.

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

August 2025

Get the category report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Featured PyCharm reviews

Shravan Revanna

Vice President at E-Cell Ramaiah

We have integrated the tool with GitHub. PyCharm provides easy integration with GitHub, allowing us to push changes directly. Many plugins are available on PyCharm for GitHub integration, including GitHub Copilot for auto code completion and GitHub Copilot Chat for assistance with code-related queries. The solution has significantly improved my coding efficiency with its feature that shows documentation when I hover over code. This feature, which was recently introduced, is especially useful when using an inbuilt function from a Python package because it gives me immediate access to documentation and references, helping me understand how to use the function properly.

Read full review

Dan Julius

Technical lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

It's just a great all-around IDE with good language support, solid integration with source control, and helpful features like virtual environment and requirements management. It even tells you if your code is compatible with different Python versions, which is awesome. Plus, their recent AI-powered code completion is pretty cool, even if it's not perfect. We use the debugger in the lab, but not really for advanced analysis. We do the basic stuff in PyCharm, but nothing fancy. But the debugger itself is very good. So, PyCharm's debugging is helpful for our development process.

Read full review

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package. Open CV is used to develop software that involves computer vision tasks. It seems the solution is not fully updated to use the latest PyCharm packages. I would like even more support toward robotics-related software tools. For example, support of ROS, ROS 1, and ROS 2 development would ensure that I continue to use the solution.

Read full review

PyCharm mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of PyCharm in the Static Code Analysis category stands at 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Aug 17, 2025

Valuable Features

PyCharm excels with comprehensive debugging, smart code analysis, and integration with source control. Users value its intuitive environment, code completion, and syntax highlighting. It supports frameworks like Django and Flask, offers efficient unit testing, and AI-powered features for code refactoring. The IDE facilitates package installation, virtual environment management, and GitHub integration. Users appreciate error detection, hints for coding issues, and efficient code structure management, enhancing productivity in complex projects. PyCharm fits well with JetBrains' ecosystem.

"PyCharm is saving me time and money in general."
"PyCharm has an excellent user experience, and I appreciate its cross-platform capabilities."
"The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines."

Room for Improvement

PyCharm users suggest improvements in several areas. Integration with Python Notebooks and OpenCV needs enhancement. Memory and system resource usage should be reduced as it affects performance, especially on laptops. Direct connections with tools like GitLab would be valuable and navigation could be enhanced for better user experience. The price for the professional edition is high, and broader language support along with a community edition would increase accessibility and adoption.

"The refactor facility in PyCharm is not on par with the refactor facility in IntelliJ. It could be improved since IntelliJ offers many more options for refactoring."
"One issue with JetBrains tools, including PyCharm, is their heavy resource usage. They can be slow to start, especially when beginning a new project, as it takes some time to index."
"Customizing the tool can make it complicated."

Pricing

Enterprise buyers evaluating PyCharm find the pricing reasonable with free and licensed options. The Community edition is free, while the Professional edition includes a fee. Users appreciate access to all JetBrains IDEs for approximately $30 per month, viewed as worthwhile despite being slightly more expensive than some competitors. Additionally, many add-ons or packages are available. Users rate the pricing highly, citing affordability and comprehensive access to multiple development tools, enhancing productivity.

"I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."
"The price is reasonable."
"The community edition is free, which is good."

Popular Use Cases

Users primarily utilize PyCharm for Python code development and optimization of algorithms in data science, machine learning, and complex software projects. It serves various purposes including data processing, debugging, and testing. PyCharm supports frameworks like Django and Flask and is employed for developing back-end applications and microservices. Teams often use it alongside other tools such as Grafana and Pylint, and some switch between PyCharm and Visual Studio depending on their specific tasks.

Service and Support

Many users have not needed to contact PyCharm support due to its reliable performance. Those who have interacted report a mix of experiences, with some noting helpful assistance and others facing delays or lack of response. Student account verification received quick attention. In comparison to other tools like Visual Studio and Jupyter Notebook, preferences vary based on specific tasks. Some users rely on the free version without needing support interaction.

Deployment

Users found PyCharm’s initial setup straightforward and easy, with many able to start within minutes. Some reiterated its simplicity by following tutorials or clicking through basic options. A few mentioned a slightly longer time for those unfamiliar with the interface. Most users chose not to explore cloud deployment, focusing on on-premises or desktop versions. Logging in with GitHub facilitated syncing settings, and users appreciated the ability to customize while noting potential complexity in deeper configurations.

Scalability

Users find PyCharm scalable and valuable, with no performance issues on large projects. Recommended for teams working with Python, PyCharm is utilized by small and medium-sized groups, often around 10-15 members. However, expanding licenses can be challenging due to cost. Despite this, its efficiency in handling workflow is appreciated. Users rate its scalability reasonably, acknowledging its capability, yet note potential budget concerns with license expansion.

Stability

Users generally rate PyCharm favorably for its stability, with many placing it between seven and ten out of ten. It handles resources well, though some note it can be resource-heavy. Most users have not experienced problems, and bugs are resolved swiftly. There is a preference for using stable versions for production, with some using the latest versions for testing. The integration features like Docker support are appreciated, contributing positively to stability remarks.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Static Code Analysis Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.