Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
HPE BladeSystem Logo

HPE BladeSystem Reviews

Vendor: Hewlett Packard Enterprise
4.3 out of 5
Badge Leader
1,207 followers
Start review

What is HPE BladeSystem?

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Get the HPE BladeSystem Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem, HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge M and more!
HPE BladeSystem is the #3 ranked solution in top Blade Servers. PeerSpot users give HPE BladeSystem an average rating of 8.6 out of 10. HPE BladeSystem is most commonly compared to HPE Synergy: HPE BladeSystem vs HPE Synergy. HPE BladeSystem is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 58% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
HPE BladeSystem
May 2025
Get the report
Helped 855,752 peers since 2012

Featured HPE BladeSystem reviews

Read more reviews

HPE BladeSystem mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem in the Blade Servers category stands at 14.1%, down from 16.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers

PeerResearch reports based on HPE BladeSystem reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryBlade ServersJun 11, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 11, 2025Download
ComparisonHPE BladeSystem vs HPE SynergyJun 11, 2025Download
ComparisonHPE BladeSystem vs Dell PowerEdge MJun 11, 2025Download
ComparisonHPE BladeSystem vs Cisco UCS B-SeriesJun 11, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
HPE Synergy4.221.3%91%90 interviewsAdd to research
Dell PowerEdge M4.318.1%95%26 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

HPE BladeSystem valued for stability, reliability, and manageability. It provides high performance, modular design, and scalability. Users appreciate centralized management, ease of integration, and flexibility. Configuration and deployment are efficient. iLO remote management and Virtual Connect reduce complexity and support redundancy. The compact footprint saves space while robust architecture supports virtualization. Cost-effective, energy-efficient, and easy to upgrade, it also offers comprehensive support and interoperability with existing infrastructure.
  • "The monitoring and support HP provides is far better compared to other systems, and if we are using HP servers along with HP tools such as HP Service Manager and HP OpenView for integrating server management and automating incident management systems, it is quite helpful and the best in the market currently."
  • "The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use."
  • "The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use."

Room for Improvement

HPE BladeSystem users highlight several areas needing improvement. They note limited scalability and manageability challenges hinder performance and agility. Users experience firmware compatibility issues between different generations of blades, affecting migrations. The management interfaces require streamlining for better user experience and faster configuration processes. A centralized console for blade and data center management is desired. Enhanced documentation and training resources are requested. Integration with existing systems and improved support from HPE is also emphasized by users.
  • "Improving HPE BladeSystem could involve enhancing the customization features which are currently less robust than other tools in the market that offer drag and drop modules."
  • "The setup process is complex."
  • "In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors."

ROI

HPE BladeSystem shows substantial financial benefits with improved remote access and firmware upgrades, leading to reduced downtime and significant savings. Despite higher initial costs, operational expenses decrease over time, achieving a 25%-30% ROI with long-term cost efficiency and increased capacity. Users highlight a two-year ROI due to reduced energy costs, with many acknowledging long-term usage beyond typical hardware cycles, enhancing their investment value. Positive economic impacts are noted with minimal downtime financial loss.

Pricing

HPE BladeSystem is considered expensive by many users, with costs ranging from $100,000 to over $1 million. Pricing can be competitive depending on features included, but some find it comparable to, or higher than, alternatives like Dell. Licensing complexity and potential extra costs for features like Insight Control Suite are noted, though some appreciate prompt licensing processes. Many users advise careful scaling to avoid unnecessary initial expenses and recommend consulting with HPE for tailored solutions.
  • "Regarding the cost, HPE BladeSystem is not cheap. The solution and its support are costly, and there are challenges with renewal and pricing, especially in Nigeria, due to the dollar rate and FX issues. However, it is reliable. I don't have specific figures for licensing costs, as the procurement and finance departments handle them."
  • "The pricing is competitive."
  • "The product’s price is high compared to one of its competitors."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations utilize HPE BladeSystem primarily for virtualization, supporting VMware, Hyper-V, and various enterprise applications. They leverage it for SQL servers, application hosting, TV broadcasting, media services, and telecommunication systems. It is favored for its reliability, server density, and manageability. Users employ it across sectors such as finance, education, and telecommunications for high availability, ERP systems like SAP, and virtual environments, ensuring optimal performance and seamless computing capabilities for mission-critical operations.

Service and Support

HPE BladeSystem customer service is outstanding, receiving high praise for fast, effective assistance. Technical support varies; users appreciate fast escalation and expertise but report inconsistency, lengthy processes, and delays. Some users encounter frustration with initial support tiers, while others benefit from proactive advanced support options. Service quality can depend on regional factors and support contracts, often resulting in satisfactory outcomes but with noted areas for improvement. Resellers and partners play a key role in customer satisfaction.

Deployment

HPE BladeSystem’s initial setup is frequently described as straightforward and quick, aided by Smart Start kits, templates, and documentation. Some users highlight seamless integration and simplicity, while others mention complexity depending on system configurations and network setups. Training requirements vary, with less experienced teams needing additional support. Vendor assistance is often valuable, and outsourcing is common. Challenges arise in network integration, especially with Virtual Connect, but experienced teams find it manageable.

Scalability

HPE BladeSystem demonstrates strong scalability, accommodating diverse organizational needs. Users report flexibly expanding infrastructure with additional blades, easily managing increased demands. BladeSystem supports both small to medium enterprises and larger setups, supporting expansion via modular components and upgrades in storage or memory. Despite occasional challenges with older generations and manual configurations, users consistently describe BladeSystem as meeting their capacity demands effectively. Enhanced integration options are noted, particularly when using complementary software solutions.

Stability

HPE BladeSystem stability is rated highly due to its robust performance and minimal downtime. Users report it remains stable with few incidents, often related to outdated firmware. Firmware updates promptly address any stability issues, and HP's support is responsive, ensuring reliability. Despite minor hardware malfunctions, users agree its stability spans several years. The infrastructure is noted for being highly dependable, with maintenance primarily for planned updates without unexpected disruptions.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our HPE BladeSystem Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Real Estate/Law Firm
5%
University
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Retailer
3%
Non Profit
3%
Construction Company
3%
Insurance Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Hospitality Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%

Compare HPE BladeSystem with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about HPE BladeSystem

HPE BladeSystem was previously known as HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem.

HPE BladeSystem customers

EMIS Health

Related questions

  • 63
How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?
  • 6
When evaluating Blade Servers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 115
Does anyone have statistics on how often a fire occurs in a computer room?
  • 16
DELL EMC Blade Servers vs UCS Blade Servers - which are the best?
  • 8
Use cases for Lenovo SN550 ThinkSystem SN550 Blade server
  • 4
Why is Blade Servers important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Blade Servers

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem Logo
HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem
Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE BladeSystem Logo
Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE BladeSystem
HPE Superdome X vs HPE BladeSystem Logo
HPE Superdome X vs HPE BladeSystem
Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem Logo
Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem
Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE BladeSystem Logo
Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE BladeSystem
HPE NonStop vs HPE BladeSystem Logo
HPE NonStop vs HPE BladeSystem
Lenovo Flex System vs HPE BladeSystem Logo
Lenovo Flex System vs HPE BladeSystem
Fujitsu CX1000 vs HPE BladeSystem Logo
Fujitsu CX1000 vs HPE BladeSystem
See all alternatives
 

HPE BladeSystem reviews

Sort by:
KP
Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG
Verified user of HPE BladeSystem
Jun 5, 2025
Reliability and reasonable pricing enhance data center management

Pros

"The monitoring and support HP provides is far better compared to other systems, and if we are using HP servers along with HP tools such as HP Service Manager and HP OpenView for integrating server management and automating incident management systems, it is quite helpful and the best in the market currently."

Cons

"Improving HPE BladeSystem could involve enhancing the customization features which are currently less robust than other tools in the market that offer drag and drop modules."

What is our primary use case?

The typical use case for HPE BladeSystem is a reliable one. The monitoring and support HP provides is far better compared to other systems, and if we are using HP servers along with HP tools such as HP Service Manager and HP OpenView for integrating server management and automating incident management systems, it is quite helpful and the best in the market currently.

We currently manage, test, and implement HPE solutions as a customer and end user.

What is most valuable?

The best features of HPE BladeSystem include its reliability, which is something we are currently using.

The cost is quite reasonable compared to other competitors.

The integration of storage and networking components within the HPE BladeSystem is quite beneficial as it is easily interoperable if we are using the same system for monitoring with the same software, which eliminates interoperability issues. We also use Nutanix and VMware, and when we have separate systems for them, it creates configuration changes and issues that are not present when using a single system.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementer
Read full review (677 words)
PeerSpot user
Asst. Manager at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Verified user of HPE BladeSystem
Feb 25, 2025
Consistently reliable system meets our needs effectively

Pros

"The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use."

Cons

"In general, there is a 10% to 15% price gap compared to competitors."

What is our primary use case?

We are using HP BladeSystem for our internal applications.

What is most valuable?

The feature I find most valuable is the ease of use. It is quite a stable system, and I rarely have to call HP support for issues. The system's reliability is also commendable.

*Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Read full review (314 words)
Buyer's Guide
HPE BladeSystem
Download free report
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem. Updated May 2025
855,752 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fatai Akinwande - PeerSpot user
Specialist Datacenter and Server at IHS Towers
Verified user of HPE BladeSystem
Sep 11, 2024
Enables you to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView feature

Pros

"Currently, we're using HPE BladeSystem BL460, but we're planning to migrate to the Synergy System as part of our strategy since the OEM support for the BL460 will eventually end. The most valuable features are its high computing capability and availability. Additionally, the ability to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView solution that comes with the HP Converge system is incredibly beneficial. The efficientand unique environment makes it an excellent fit for our needs. "

Cons

"In terms of improvements, I'd suggest enhancing the stability of the HPE BladeSystem, especially regarding network connectivity. We once had an issue where a system didn’t communicate with the network, and it took a while to diagnose the problem. Eventually, we discovered it was a motherboard issue, but we initially thought it was the network card. Improving the onboard administratordashboard to provide more granular insights, like clearly identifying faultycomponents, would make troubleshooting much more efficient. Aside from that, the system is superb and has been reliable. "

What is our primary use case?

We use HPE BladeSystem primarily for high availability. It's installed on an HP Converge BladeSystem, and we utilize ten of the sixteen available slots. All ten HPE BladeSystems are clustered, which allows us to leverage their high computing capability to spin up hundreds of VMs. This setup provides us with the performance we need. I work in IT within a telecom infrastructure company and am one of the IT infrastructure engineers responsible for managing the data center infrastructure.

What is most valuable?

Currently, we're using HPE BladeSystem BL460, but we're planning to migrate to the Synergy System as part of our strategy since the OEM support for the BL460 will eventually end. The most valuable features are its high computing capability and availability. Additionally, the ability to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView solution that comes with the HP Converge system is incredibly beneficial. The efficientand unique environment makes it an excellent fit for our needs.

*Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Read full review (663 words)
RonnieYazdani - PeerSpot user
Head of Sales at Omgea Exim Ltd
Verified user of HPE BladeSystem
Oct 27, 2024
Robust connectivity and low latency enhance management efficiency with prompt support

Pros

"The robustness and the connectivity between all servers and the storage aspect are the most beneficial features of HPE BladeSystem. "

Cons

"Creating an integrated solution could make HPE BladeSystem more appealing."

What is our primary use case?

We are actually a reseller and consultant for HPE BladeSystem. We work in various industries such as finance, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, education, and hospitality.

How has it helped my organization?

The management console for all servers and virtual machines is centralized on one dashboard, which enhances management efficiency.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
Read full review (424 words)
JuanDuque - PeerSpot user
Manager of Capacity and Control Management at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of HPE BladeSystem
Aug 11, 2022
Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up

Pros

"The product has been simple to set up."

Cons

"It could always use new tools. "

What is our primary use case?

I'm working just with the Generation 9 and Generation 10 as Generation 8 is obsolete. We are leaving that kind of solution. These generations are a little bit obsolete since the processor, and the spec of the Blades are behind a newer HP solution.  

Right now, we're using that with a Citrix server and use it with VMware SX 7.0.

What is most valuable?

It's scalable, and it's stable.

The product has been simple to set up.

*Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Read full review (772 words)
PeerSpot user
Network and Telecommunication Section Manager at a consumer goods company with 501-1,000 employees
Verified user of HPE BladeSystem
Nov 18, 2024
Stable, reliable performance with no downtime in a decade

Pros

"We were pleased with the stability of the system as there were no downtimes for the last ten years due to hardware failures. "

Cons

"The support from HPE has not been satisfactory in the last two to three years."

What is our primary use case?

We have our ERP system, which is SAP, running on the blade servers. Additionally, we have business applications like intelligent tools and network operations tools running on the BladeSystem, all running on the VMware platform.

How has it helped my organization?

We never faced downtime due to hardware failure. The BladeSystem provided stable performance and we were satisfied with the contract from HPE, which renewed every year.

*Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Read full review (558 words)
JN
Senior IT Operations Specialist at Denel
Verified user of HPE BladeSystem
Jun 23, 2023
A reliable product used for virtualization while also providing significant scalability

Pros

"Basically, in a cluster, it works really nicely, especially within a cluster environment. Also, it's easily configurable."

Cons

"HPE BladeSystem that we are using is currently very old. It's not too good. We haven't renewed it. I would like the solution to have more updates."

What is our primary use case?

I was using the solution for virtualization. I used it for all Microsoft products, Unix and Linux.

What is most valuable?

Basically, in a cluster, it works really nicely, especially within a cluster environment. Also, it's easily configurable.

*Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Read full review (399 words)
WG
Systems Analyst at BCFSA
Verified user of HPE BladeSystem
Aug 6, 2022
Good service, reliable, and remotely accessible through the iLO feature

Pros

"Uptime and service are valuable for us. When we have an issue, uptime and being able to get an emergency replacement or actual service is the most important thing for us."

Cons

"I am not sure if iLO is included or if there is a separate license. If it is not included, it should be included in the license. It is such a valuable feature especially because people are working remotely. "

What is our primary use case?

Most of our things are low intensity on the compute side. It is just redundancy and backup. We have some legacy apps that are web applications on .NET. They're all Windows servers.

We also have some file servers. When it comes to the file servers, we are getting away from that and moving everything to the cloud. It is mainly going to be used to maintain our legacy infrastructure, and it is mostly going to be for .NET and low-intensity things.

What is most valuable?

Uptime and service are valuable for us. When we have an issue, uptime and being able to get an emergency replacement or actual service is the most important thing for us.

With iLO and other features, our experience has been really good especially when a lot of people are working remote or offsite. The iLO feature gives us the ability to get onto our server when we're remote. In the case of any issues, we can access it and reboot it if we need to.

*Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Read full review (833 words)