HPE BladeSystem vs Lenovo Flex System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,782 views|2,784 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Lenovo Logo
661 views|500 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and Lenovo Flex System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is easy to scale if you have the licensing.""Uptime and service are valuable for us. When we have an issue, uptime and being able to get an emergency replacement or actual service is the most important thing for us.""It is a stable, dependable solution.""The solution is very easy to use.""It provides a secure access to the console and reliable administration.""Modularity is a key feature that provides energy saving .""I have noticed that the solution does provide a very good ROI for companies.""I really appreciate the integrated Onboard Administrator, the iLO (Integrated Lights-Out) modular network, and the SAN Switches."

More HPE BladeSystem Pros →

"The initial setup is straightforward.""The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system.""The product is very user-friendly and has many resources at the enterprise level.""One of the most valuable features of this solution is its ease of use.""The Lenovo Flex System is very stable.""Flex System's best features are its performance and stability.""The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads."

More Lenovo Flex System Pros →

Cons
"Really look at it closely, but really look at the Synergy product as well. That seems to me like that's the next evolution of the BladeSystem.""The solution could improve by having more automation, such as the automatic mapping feature that is available in the Synergy Blade series.""HPE BladeSystem that we are using is currently very old. It's not too good. We haven't renewed it. I would like the solution to have more updates.""The management side of this solution could be improved.""Currently, in the case of a disk failure there is a need to remove the whole bay and as a result, to disconnect all the other disks.""The problem is that when want to expand with a new chassis, you have to do everything manually. It's not automatic.""The response time in terms of getting technical support assistance could be improved.""HPE BladeSystem can improve proactive monitoring."

More HPE BladeSystem Cons →

"The most valuable feature of the Lenovo Flex System is the storage system.""Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved.""It does not have the same module flexibility that was present in IBM Blade. On the Blade System, I was able to choose between the Cisco module, or BMC module. Since the switch to Lenovo, I have not had the same choice of modules, only the BMC modules.""Forced restarts due to free upgrades is an issue that needs to be resolved. We can manage this as we have high availability and redundancy, but without that it could be a real problem.""The solution could improve by providing more integration with other platforms.""The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one.""The product could improve its integration capabilities."

More Lenovo Flex System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Their licensing program is pretty simple."
  • "With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."
  • "The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."
  • "Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
  • "​The price could be cheaper."
  • "The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."
  • "It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
  • "It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
  • More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing."
  • "The price is interesting. I am able to quote a client based on their needs and offer them either Lenovo or Dell."
  • "There is a one-off payment to buy the equipment and the support is purchased annually."
  • "The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier."
  • "The 14 blade server allows significant room for upscaling before having to invest in another chassis. You would have to purchase another chassis much sooner in the case of an eight or nine blade server."
  • More Lenovo Flex System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
    Top Answer:Flex System's best features are its performance and stability.
    Top Answer:The is an annual license cost to use the Lenovo Flex System. If the price was less expensive and flexible overall and for additional features, our customers would be happier.
    Top Answer:Flex System's integration with the XClarity Management System could be improved.
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,782
    Comparisons
    2,784
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.9
    10th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    661
    Comparisons
    500
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    329
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
    Flex System Blade Servers, Flex System SN Series
    Learn More
    Overview
    HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

    Flex System is Lenovo’s proven, 2nd generation blade, that efficiently runs your infrastructure applications with up to 80% better density than standard rack server deployments.

    Sample Customers
    EMIS Health
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews while Lenovo Flex System is ranked 10th in Blade Servers with 7 reviews. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6, while Lenovo Flex System is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Flex System writes "Provides a high initial ceiling before upscaling is required, user-friendly and rich in resources, but has occasional stability issues". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X, whereas Lenovo Flex System is most compared with HPE Superdome X, HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series and Dell PowerEdge M. See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System report.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.