Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point SandBlast Network Logo

Check Point SandBlast Network Reviews

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Check Point SandBlast Network?

Check Point’s evasion-resistant technology maximizes zero-day protection without compromising business productivity. For the first time, businesses can reduce the risk of unknown attacks by implementing a prevent-first approach. Learn More about Check Point Sandblast

Get the Check Point SandBlast Network Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and more!
Check Point SandBlast Network is the #7 ranked solution in top Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions. PeerSpot users give Check Point SandBlast Network an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Check Point SandBlast Network is most commonly compared to Microsoft Defender for Office 365: Check Point SandBlast Network vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365. Check Point SandBlast Network is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 43% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 14% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point SandBlast Network
October 2025
Get the report
Helped 871,469 peers since 2012

Featured Check Point SandBlast Network reviews

Read more reviews

Check Point SandBlast Network mindshare

As of October 2025, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category stands at 4.0%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point SandBlast Network4.0%
Palo Alto Networks WildFire10.7%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint9.0%
Other76.3%
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

PeerResearch reports based on Check Point SandBlast Network reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryAdvanced Threat Protection (ATP)Oct 22, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 22, 2025Download
ComparisonCheck Point SandBlast Network vs Palo Alto Networks WildFireOct 22, 2025Download
ComparisonCheck Point SandBlast Network vs Microsoft Defender for Office 365Oct 22, 2025Download
ComparisonCheck Point SandBlast Network vs Microsoft Defender for EndpointOct 22, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Defender for Office 3654.27.7%96%53 interviewsAdd to research
Palo Alto Networks WildFire4.210.7%91%71 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Check Point SandBlast Network excels with pro-active threat prevention, zero-day protection, sandboxing, and threat extraction features. Its integration with AI for threat detection and automatic updates enhances its security capabilities. SandBlast Network effectively sanitizes emails and web downloads, supports various protocols, and provides real-time threat extraction. The ability to segregate networks and perform detailed forensic analysis while ensuring network safety against emerging threats makes it indispensable for organizations managing sensitive data.
  • "The best feature Check Point SandBlast Network offers is real-time threat extraction capabilities, which sanitizes the files, mails, and other content before reaching the end-users."
  • "Check Point SandBlast Network stops unknown malware and zero-day attacks, and we rely on it to prevent zero-day threats before they enter our enterprise network to protect our productivity, so it has to sanitize files that are delivered immediately to our users in our organization."
  • "Check Point SandBlast Network has positively impacted my organization as it's very accurate and gives almost no false positives, providing excellent threat prevention and protecting against server zero-day attacks."

Room for Improvement

Check Point SandBlast Network requires better machine learning coverage for file types and improved MDM integration. HTTPS inspection and GUI performance need refinement. Customers desire expanded file type analysis, enhanced support, better documentation, more third-party integrations, and cost reduction. Performance improvements are necessary due to increased resource demands and delay in threat emulation. Users seek improved usability, more granular tuning, and faster file scanning. Customer support response times should be quicker. Deployment complexities and cost concerns persist.
  • "When we enable sandboxing for all users, the CPU utilization of the firewall increases significantly, which could be improved."
  • "It has some performance overhead, as sandboxing takes time and real-time delivery depends on threat extraction, requiring high performance."
  • "The customer support for Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved as they are sometimes late with their responses."

ROI

Organizations utilizing Check Point SandBlast Network reported increased confidence by blocking unknown threats and risks. They noted financial gains of up to 80%, reduced incidents, regulatory compliance improvement, and business continuity. Companies experienced peace of mind with robust geographic policies enhancing network security. Time and financial savings became evident, protecting thousands of users from attacks and allowing them to work safely, boosting economic growth. Time spent on threat detection significantly decreased.

Pricing

Enterprise users found Check Point SandBlast Network pricing and licensing costs high, yet manageable with appropriate planning. A correct license set is crucial for full functionality. Costs can be negotiated, especially with a Check Point provider. Despite being relatively expensive, many consider the pricing competitive, offering a strong price-cost relationship. Annual subscriptions and additional support costs are standard. Evaluating the free trial can inform decisions based on budget and organizational needs.
  • "The product's cost is high."
  • "The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."
  • "The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Check Point SandBlast Network for advanced threat protection, focusing on sandboxing and malware inspection. It is extensively deployed for perimeter security, cloud and on-premise environments, email and file scanning, and zero-day threat prevention. SandBlast integrates well with firewalls and email gateways, using features like threat extraction and emulation to mitigate potential security risks. It offers real-time protection against phishing and social engineering attacks, ensuring a clean and secure client environment.

Service and Support

Check Point SandBlast Network's customer service and support show mixed experiences. Some users report a sluggish response and desire more specific support, yet consistently praise dedicated reps for addressing issues promptly. Several users express satisfaction, rating support highly despite occasional delays. Others, mostly partners, recognize good support but note complex guides and desire a smoother process. The technical assistance is called very supportive, yet improvement in response times and escalation is suggested.

Deployment

Initial setup of Check Point SandBlast Network varies by environment. Some users find it straightforward and simple, especially in cloud settings, while others encounter complexity due to lack of information or specific configurations like MTA. Setup can be easy with good experience, but challenging for beginners. Some face technical issues requiring patching. Deployment times range, with potential for quick implementation or extended processes involving multiple tiers and integration steps.

Scalability

Check Point SandBlast Network generally offers strong scalability. Many users note its capability to easily expand with added appliances or transition to cloud-based solutions. While some larger organizations have faced challenges, smaller ones seem to scale effectively. New features like Maestro impress, and its adaptability with third-party tools is appreciated. Some users mention resource-intensive needs, but feedback mostly reflects positive experiences with scaling, including successful integration and load balancing across varied company sizes.

Stability

Many users find Check Point SandBlast Network stable, reporting no disruptions during use. Some experience occasional performance issues or resource-heavy usage, causing brief cloud connectivity interruptions. A few encountered outages due to provider-side changes, while others report rare portal access difficulties. Despite these instances, high availability configurations often ensure uninterrupted operation. Frequently praised for reliability, it remains trusted for maintaining service stability under large workloads when configured correctly with appropriate resources.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Check Point SandBlast Network Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business22
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business55
Midsize Enterprise38
Large Enterprise70
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
University
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Legal Firm
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Security Firm
4%
Government
4%
Outsourcing Company
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Performing Arts
3%
Engineering Company
3%
Non Profit
2%
Construction Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Retailer
1%
Library
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Check Point SandBlast Network with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Check Point SandBlast Network

Check Point SandBlast Network customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media

Related questions

  • 44
How much do independent test results affect your security purchases?
  • 12
Holding Security Vendors Accountable
  • 9
What can businesses do to improve their security posture?
  • 10
When evaluating Advanced Threat Protection, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 118
What is your recommended cost-effective solution to detect and prevent APT attacks?
  • 61
Compromise Assessment vs Threat Hunting
  • 25
What are the main evaluation criteria for you when choosing the right vendor for brand protection services?
  • 144
Why is ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Check Point SandBlast Network
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network Logo
Symantec Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network
See all alternatives
 
Check Point SandBlast Network Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Technical Specialist at Softcell Technologies Limited4.5I use Check Point SandBlast Network for sandboxing to detect zero-day attacks. Its integration enhances security, offering real-time protection and faster response. Improvement areas include dashboard usability and file scanning speed. It outperforms Fortinet in threat detection.
Cybersecurity Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.5I use Check Point SandBlast Network to stop zero-day threats through sandboxing and file sanitization; it's reliable with wide protocol coverage, though performance overhead exists. Stability is good, but evasive malware detection could be improved.
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack4.0I've used Check Point SandBlast Network for over three years to enhance security through real-time threat extraction and sandboxing, though high CPU usage occurs; it's stable, scalable, and has effectively blocked malicious files in our Azure cloud setup.
Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees4.0I've used Check Point SandBlast Network for a year mainly for threat prevention, and it's been effective with minimal false positives, though support response and cost could improve; overall, it's boosted our security and fits our zero trust model.
Cloud computing at ITQS4.0We implemented Check Point SandBlast Network to enhance our security posture and improve network monitoring, benefiting from features like sandbox analysis and SSL inspection. However, configuration and usability could be improved, and AI and ML integration would be beneficial.
Network security architect at ATOS4.5I reviewed Check Point SandBlast Network, which enhances security through advanced threat prevention using geographic-based policies to address vulnerabilities like XSS and SQL injection. While highly secure, support response times can be inconsistent. Competitors like Fortinet and Cisco offer alternatives.
Principal Cybersecurity Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees4.5I primarily use Check Point SandBlast Network for malware inspection, specifically for file submissions. It offers rich features, excellent support, and effective deployment. Improvement is needed in integrations with third-party solutions. It saves both money and time, offering a good ROI.
Soporte técnico superior at Acobo4.0We implemented Check Point SandBlast Network to enhance our internal perimeter security and integrate with other solutions. Its forensic analysis is precise, aiding in understanding vulnerabilities. However, we desire better elasticity and third-party integration for edge analytics.