What is your primary use case for Ubiquiti Wireless?

I use Ubiquiti Wireless ( /products/ubiquiti-wireless-reviews ) to connect various devices such as radio terminals, laptops, and phones to our software for production management through a wireless connection.

Right now I am testing SNMP, and version three SNMP is proving a little bit difficult.

Our primary use case for Ubiquiti Wireless ( /products/ubiquiti-wireless-reviews ) involves working in a retail environment. We have access points deployed in the shop.

We are using Ubiquiti Wireless in a small environment. I am also involved in selling and using Ubiquiti products. We have been using products such as the Pro, AC Pro as an access point, and UDM Pro Plus for over ten years.

We primarily use the product for our financial management and CRM needs. It’s integrated into our ERP system, which supports our sales, marketing, and customer service operations.

It is used in an office environment. We had an incorrect deployment. Office Ubiquiti access points were deployed in the warehouse, and they start to fail when you reach above 90 degrees. In the warehouse ceiling, it's well over 90 degrees, so four of them failed. Rather than just replace them, I decided to use outdoor access points inside the warehouse. They can survive extreme temperatures. It's more my preference that I prefer Ruckus. There are only three big top names: Cisco, Aruba, and Ruckus. Cisco is only there because of brand recognition, but I've always appreciated Ruckus for Wi-Fi over any other brand because they truly sell a "set it and forget it" system. If you're the IT guy and you're a one-man operation, you look for things that can heal themselves and provide their own maintenance. Other systems require a lot of heavy lifting. Ruckus doesn't. It costs more, but you get what you pay for. So, that's one of the reasons I would have replaced it with Ruckus down the road anyway. It was just convenient that these failures are taking place now.

We use the tool internally and for client portfolios.

I use the solution in my company for our different clients who use Ubiquiti Wireless, considering that it is a fairly reliable tool. The tool provides a yearly subscription for a service. The product has a web interface on which you can log in, ensuring that it is always available while allowing you to see what is going on in your environment. You can control the features of the tool. You can use the tool for mapping or building features and to check various access points. With the product in place, you can look at the access points of more than 200 devices, and it can also handle more devices as it allows users to add other access points. With Ubiquiti Wireless, the actual range for the access point is fairly good. The product has features like controller migrations.

My company uses the product to deal with the Wi-Fi networking part for our customers to provide Wi-Fi coverage for our customers.

In my company, we use Ubiquiti Wireless since it is a very simple product that is very useful for the IT team in our company who manages our office network.

I primarily use the solution within small networks.

Ubiquiti wireless is quite good for us, especially in terms of price and functionality. We often provide maintenance services to companies for their internal land areas, and we rent or sell access points to them for Wi-Fi access. Additionally, we provide support for their internal network, which is why we use Ubiquiti access points.

At home, I use it for myself. There are no captive portals or anything like that, only wireless access. Only wifi.

We primarily use the solution for wireless connectivity. It's for mobile management. It can manage my switches and everything via mobile.

We have approximately 60 branches and they all use access points, and they are controlled by one software controller in our headquarters. We use it only for normal Wi-Fi and guests.

This solution is widely used in Iraq. We primarily use the solution as an access point for hotels. If you want to install a wireless system, you use the products called Unifi access points, and it has a couple of models, like the UAP-AC-LR and a UAP-AC-Pro. This is for making a system for wireless setups for hotels, hospitals, and universities.

Ubiquiti Wireless is used for networking for academic use.

We are using Ubiquiti Wireless in our company when our invites or customers come into building and they want to connect their devices, such as notebooks and phones.

The solution has an easy configuration. We use this solution for showcases at our organization. We use it in the case of UB-KIT for guests and production for the wireless WLAN segment.

We use it to set up wireless WANs ranging from a single access point in a small business to 100 apartments in an accommodation complex.

We primarily use the solution for small businesses.

We primarily use the solution for a wireless connection for our hotel and resort.

We primarily use the solution for wireless connectivity to the internet in the office. You can roam around and stay connected easily.

The primary use cases of this solution include home use and hospitality, for example: small cafes, etc. It's used in most small businesses where they just need a few ITs and they need simple management, which also means that they're not too worried about the security.

We use this solution as wifi wireless points and controllers.

We deployed it alongside Linksys. The way I'm using it is the way I have used Linksys. We can use it for WLAN deployments and outdoor wireless connectivity. We can use it for wireless hotspots - the long range type.

It's useful for me because I can extend more devices to my clients so that they can connect in the summertime. In the summertime, you have high traffic because everyone is on vacation, and they can connect to a wireless solution.

I used it briefly, primarily for a small deployment. That included the controller and a couple of access points. The deployment took place over the course of a few months. It was just for wireless connectivity in an office setup.

Our primary use case is for office networking. We are customers of Ubiquiti and I'm the IT and software manager.

We use the solution to connect our buildings and stations together.

The primary use case is to provide wireless access.

We use it mostly for our office network.

We use the solution for big houses and sometimes in hotels.

We have offices scattered around the building and some of them may be used for phoning in to access conference calls. Also, when someone comes in with a laptop, they can be wirelessly connected to our network. This is easier than using a wired connection.

We mostly use Ubiquiti Wireless for small business wireless solutions.

We use the solution for small operations, for example, offices and hotels.

We've used this solution for consulting and industrial companies.

We primarily use the solution for wireless office or home networks.

We are a solution provider and Ubiquiti is one of the wireless products that we implement for our customers. We also implement wired products, such as switches and gateways. We primarily used this product for building industrial networks in production and manufacturing companies, especially warehouses. This includes offices, as well.

We use Ubiquiti and part of our network infrastructure.

Our primary use case is for wireless networking but we've done more work on the industrial side. I've done work in medical, construction, and business corporates. There are quite a couple of corporate installations as well, but mostly in warehousing and that kind of thing.

Our primary use case is for point to point communication. We also design our clients' platforms. We are internet providers.

We are a solution provider and this is one of the wireless solutions that we set up for my clients. Normally, we do office wireless solutions. I've done one or two home wireless solutions for people that can afford Ubiquity products. Mostly, we've implemented Ubiquity in warehouses. I've also installed it in a medical scenario and in a restaurant solution.

We use this solution for point to point. For example, if we have an ISP and you want to feed a company with bandwidth, we use the "add point to point" feature for wifi. We use it as an access point, but if you are talking about manifestation, this is for a very limited range, evaluated in a limited number of people. If you want to have a real ISP business, you need a different solution. It can be installed inside a system, and then you use that setup to broadcast a signal. It's very stable in most cases if we don't have Microsoft. We use the on-premises version of the solution.

I use Ubiquiti Wireless for WiFi deployment in my flat in Switzerland where I have one access point and two switches. The flat is about 80 to 100 square meters, so one access point is enough. I have also installed it in my parents' two-family house where there are four access points. The house has three floors so requires more access points to cover the whole area. A lot also depends on the thickness of the building's walls. If you want good coverage and you're using the 5Ghz frequency band, I think you need one access point per 60 square meters.

We are a system integrator and this is one of the solutions that we provide to our customers. This solution is used for an on-premises WiFi access point.

We want to have full control over the product so we use it on-premises. Our main customer base is in the city of Leyden for free outdoor wifi usage. We have about 100 access points around the city. We do interlinks and point links, as well as in harbors, campsites, and anywhere there is demand locally. We do service other cities, but Leyden is the main city. We do testing and development with routing data over wireless networks.

We mostly use the solution for Wi-Fi access points. Mostly it's indoors, but sometimes it's outdoors as well.