What advice do you have for others considering Orchestrated Service Virtualization?

I would rate Tricentis Tosca an 8 out of 10 because they don't provide live chat support. Adding this feature would make it easier to use. Tricentis Tosca is a licensed tool, and currently we don't get much information from the outside world if someone is not able to use it. However, from the support, purchasing, and licensing perspectives, it is superior compared to other tools. It ranks among the top five automation tools available. Overall review rating: 8 out of 10.

Overall, I rate Tricentis Tosca as a ten out of ten.

The main issue with Tricentis Tosca is its cost, which is very high. Although using Tosca can reduce the number of testers needed compared to open-source tools like Selenium, companies might still need to focus on resources. I would recommend Tricentis reduce the cost of its licenses. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten as I am satisfied with it.

Overall, I would rate Tricentis Tosca eight out of ten. I can recommend it to other users for enterprise customers.

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten; it is not a ten because I don't know everything about it.

I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.

From an environmental standpoint, we’ve noticed that some existing scripts stop working whenever a new upgrade or patch is applied. This leads to a time-consuming process of identifying the root cause. We eventually realized that after upgrading the task coverage, the scripts failed because they could no longer identify certain objects or elements. The issue arises without clear information on why the identification failed. The application would launch as usual from a specific location, but the scripts suddenly stopped working after the modules were changed or updated. Overall, I rate the solution as five out of ten since I face challenges with the environment setup, user management, and other aspects.

I rate the platform an eight out of ten.

In terms of what has significantly improved test automation in Tricentis Tosca, I would say that it is traceability. In Tosca, we can trace the user cases and all the test cases to any extent. We can measure test coverage. From the user-front, it is easy to work with the tool. Speaking about how the risk-based testing approach of Tosca impacts our clients' testing outcomes, I would say that when we start working on a client, we do some assessments to understand the maturity level of the client based on the past. Also, we work and provide some demo specials, show the features the tool has, and then provide some solutions. Tosca is not very good for test management. Tricentis has some other tools, like qTest, which is a good option. I recommend the tool to others. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.

I usually recommend the solution to companies that use SAP. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. Price is one limitation. There are certifications available, and once you pass, you become certified. The interface is completely codeless. I use it as an enterprise solution, and it saves money for companies. It saves money for companies, especially for automation. For example, with an automation task, executing the three different lead steps can be complex and require some programming, which can lead to issues.

Tricentis Tosca offers robust support for risk-based testing through its model-based testing approach. This methodology includes a risk analysis component that helps cover various test scenarios, including combinatorial testing and CVD, thus ensuring comprehensive test coverage. While the impact on testing processes might not be significant regarding productivity, Tosca's scriptless nature streamlines test case automation and maintenance, making it accessible to functional analysts without scripting expertise. Additionally, it integrates with test data management tools, such as CA Test Data Manager (TDM), to ensure updated and relevant data availability for test case execution. Regarding recommendation, it is well-suited for legacy or packaged applications but may not be optimal for web-driven projects where Selenium offers superior functionality. However, considering Tosca's roadmap, which heavily aligns with SAP and other packaged applications, it remains a preferable option for enterprises with diverse testing requirements. I rate it a seven.

Speaking about the feature of the product that has the largest impact on our company's testing process, I would say that I use Selenium to take care of the coding part. In Tricentis Tosca, we can't use Git code, considering the user-based experience and UI for the testing process. Speaking about the codeless test creation feature in Tricentis Tosca, I would say that in some of the software where the quality assurance team does the verification, Selenium is used by quality analysts. In Selenium, we used to write the codes to check basic stuff. In Tricentis Tosca, we don't have to write any scripts. Integrating the product into my company's CI/CD pipeline affected the release cycles in a good way. For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing. Considering the emerging trends in the automation space, I would say that Tricentis Tosca is a good software. I rate the tool a seven and a half out of ten.

Test data management capabilities are very proprietary and very specific. We have to compare the test data anyhow. In the end, we consolidated the two solutions. One was the open-source solution for test automation, and the other was for specific protocols. We decided to have only two types of solutions. Integrating with Jenkins or Jira requires some setup and configuration, and achieving compatibility with our existing systems, including Jenkins and our test governance processes, hasn't been straightforward. As of now, we haven't achieved a fully integrated solution. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

It is recommended to start with training sessions to understand how to use the tool effectively. Pricing might vary based on your organization's specific needs and requirements, so exploring the pricing options is advised. I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Cost is a significant factor. Tosca has strong features that may not be suitable for every product or project. Tosca should provide a free community learning platform for individuals to explore Tosca before making a purchasing decision. Tosca is primarily focused on SAP environments. SAP is a player in the IT landscape. Tosca's scope extends beyond just SAP to address various testing needs across different domains within IT. Tosca has strong integration with SAP systems. Tosca is a comprehensive test automation tool that caters to various domains, including medical, fintech, e-commerce, B2B, B2C, communication applications, and other role-based applications. Tosca can also be applied to automate testing across a wide range of IT industry sectors. It's a well-known tool in the market for its versatility and effectiveness in test automation beyond the SAP ecosystem. We are working with the MBT approach. Tosca is compatible with SDET practices, and its main purpose is achieved through model-based test automation. Tricentis Tosca offers built-in libraries for integration purposes, allowing users to implement various integrations seamlessly. Test cases can be executed by configuring AWS, Azure, or DFS integrations. These integrations are built-in and provide capabilities that enhance convenience and flexibility. Tosca is a robust and competent solution, leveraging cutting-edge technologies to capture locators, record test cases, and execute actions across various UI platforms. It is compatible with the latest technologies like TypeScript, JavaScript, Angular, and other user interface platforms. I highly recommend this solution for those who are considering purchasing it Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I rate Tricentis Tosca an eight out of ten.

So, if you need to accelerate the delivery of your solution and leverage the low-code, no-code platform, that's where you can actually bring in quite a lot of automation with the region type in Tricentis Tosca. Maintaining your test scenarios, running them immediately to create mind maps, and then using new-generation tools like xMine to integrate with Tricentis Tosca can significantly reduce the testing cycle time from a typical 20-35% of the software engineering cycle to as low as 10%. This can significantly improve the turnaround time for decision-making. I would rate it a seven out of ten. There are lots of alternatives that are available at a good price point. So when you are working with large customers who have big budgets, bigger budgets, certain places are something that they are going to take up. When they are working with medium-sized customers, potentially, the signatures could actually address that.

For maintenance, only one person who is an admin is required. The solution's features are good. I think whoever wants to use it should understand the tool's capabilities first before taking a dive so they can try a PoC with the tool and then go ahead to use it. I rate the product a seven out of ten.

I would recommend this solution for browser testing because it's stable, and you can test a lot with it. It has a good user interface for testing and when managing you don't have to do a record all the time. It can be easy to maintain and use scripts. For SAP and embedded browser apps it doesn't work fine. Also it is not suitable anymore for users without a technical background. Tricentis is a growing organization and Tosca is not holding the standards it used to have. I rate Tricentis Tosca a six out of ten.

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. It needs additional support for industry-standard protocols. My advice to anyone looking to implement this solution would be to bring in an expert to make sure that the initial setup is done correctly and then build upon that.