IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

ScaleIO [EOL] OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

What is ScaleIO [EOL]?

ScaleIO is purposely designed to be an enterprise-grade scale-out software-defined storage solution. It applies the principles of server virtualization to standard x86 server flash and hybrid media, turning them into high performance, sharable, pools of storage. Whether your block storage needs are for traditional, modern or cloud workloads, ScaleIO has you covered.

ScaleIO [EOL] was previously known as EMC ScaleIO.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Software Defined Storage (SDS) Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: May 2022

ScaleIO [EOL] Customers

Check Point Software Technologies, Blue Central, Deltares, Sentinel Technologies, The Binding Site Group, Swisscom, Itrica

ScaleIO [EOL] Video

Archived ScaleIO [EOL] Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Manager, Service Delivery at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
MSP
Meets our customers' needs but they should move towards high-level scaling
Pros and Cons
  • "Compared to other products in this category that are competing with Dell EMC, Dell seems to us to always come out on top."
  • "There is room for improvement in the area of horizontal scaling."

What is our primary use case?

Based on customer needs we sell different solutions as consultants. It is deployed as a data center solution to enhance storage and performance.  

What is most valuable?

I do not have much information on the technical front. We use this product when it meets a customer's needs for solutions to business requirements in their data centers. I sell this product to meet customer requirements.  

What needs improvement?

I the product already has scalability features, but in terms of size maybe they could do more to work with parent storage and move to high-level scaling. That area, I feel, is a place where there could be some more options in this solution. It would be a way to improve the scalability in another direction, maybe options to scale out rather than just up.  

So far we have done very few installations. So maybe in the coming days, weeks and months, we would be able to come up with some additional features that are needed, but right now the product has the competitive features that our clients need.  

For how long have I used the solution?

We only began using the Dell ScaleIO solution (rebranded from VxFlex OS) only recently, over this last year.  

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

So far, we have not faced any particular issues with the stability of the product. We have only seen some very small issues and other glitches. Other than these small issues that we were able to resolve, there have been no complexities so far in the aspect of the stability of the product.  

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I think ScaleIO already has some features for scalability as it is part of the reason for the product. But in terms of size, maybe they should try to address parent storage. In that area, they need to have more options.  

We have done, I think, only two implementations so far. There are some more going on, but these are only in the discovery phase. In the coming year, I expect that we will pick up more clients who will be implementing this product as a solution.  

The size of the user group of one of the implementations is about 100 plus users, and the other one is somewhere between 100 to 150 plus on a team. The second is only a little larger. Scalability per user does not seem to be much of an issue.  

How are customer service and technical support?

We have been in touch with the technical support fairly frequently. It is really not for major issues. They are very good and they are always supportive. We are quite satisfied with the support team. No problem there at all.  

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have used other products from other vendors in the same category. We are using mostly Dell products for the storage and servers unless a customer comes specifically demanding another brand. Otherwise, we are pushing the Dell products. Other than that, another brand we might recommend is Cisco ACS. This is based on customer needs only.  

We use these products so that we do not create too much complication for ourselves and can best serve our clients. Comparing other products that are competing with Dell EMC (Enhanced Memory Controller), Dell seems to us to always come out on the high-side.  

How was the initial setup?

The product is still really somewhat new to us, so the people doing the installations are still gaining experience. It will take some more time for us to get our confidence with the product to truly be at the expert level. But so far we have not faced any major challenges. We have been supported by the OEM itself. So we do not find any major complexity with installing it. If we did, we have full support.  

So we need more time to get to the expert level. After we have done multiple implementations and supported them over time, we will have that extra level of knowledge from working with the product in multiple environments with varied architectures. We can not get this just from testing and use in our own environment alone.  

In our cases with current clients, it has taken extra time to implement and deploy because of client limitations. We have to take some time in the stage of planning with the clients and going through the process correctly so they divulge what they really need and we know how to implement the solution correctly to satisfy that. Implementation is not so simple as I go there and install it. We will have to work with the migration also and do proper planning to achieve the minimum downtime. A lot of the length of time needed for deployment is getting the information we need from the customer. If the process with the client were more straightforward and they knew already what they had to supply to us, the deployment will take much less time instead of spending a lot of time in discovery. The implementation has been taking almost a quarter (three months), because of the complexity.  

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Any brand we have had the opportunity to evaluate is potentially something that we can use. We can choose from almost all major brands, like Cisco, Juniper, Alcatel, Fortinet — all of the available products that we evaluate are possibilities.  

What other advice do I have?

We have come across only two use cases. We are recommending Dell because of the features. We try to convince the customers when meeting with them to move over to Dell as a newer, better solution compared to what they might already have. Of course, this is while we show them the benefits of everything. We clarifying the complexity of usage of other products, and the ease-of-use of the Dell solution. Compared to the other solutions, we basically explain to them why this is a better choice.  

On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate ScaleIO overall at around six to seven. It is closer to a seven.  

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Infrastructure Services System Administrator with 1,001-5,000 employees
User
Automatic rebalancing is the feature saving administration time
Pros and Cons
  • "Automatic rebalancing is the feature saving administration time."
  • "We are using it as the primary virtualization storage (both for internal corporate users and external customers) for VMware and Hyper-V virtualization platforms."
  • "It would be nice to set minimum IOPS per volume, besides just the maximum, to be able to satisfy this demand from customers out-of-the-box, not by calculating number of disks, etc."
  • "Ecosystem around the product: There is no built-in system for viewing history data, such as volume IOPS. We have to provide graphing by Prometheus and Grafana, which would be a good new feature in ScaleIO."

What is our primary use case?

We are using it as the primary virtualization storage (both for internal corporate users and external customers) for VMware and Hyper-V virtualization platforms.

How has it helped my organization?

The idea was born from pre-sales requests for storage resources. The primary goal was to have a storage solution where you do not have to invest a large amount of money just to start, and have idle resources, yet have a locally supported enterprise solution on commodity hardware. In other words, have a pay-as-you-grow, horizontally scaled solution, where front-end controllers are not the bottleneck.

What is most valuable?

Automatic rebalancing is the feature saving administration time, and also auto rebuilding. Enterprise storage IOPS limiting is also good.

What needs improvement?

  • Ecosystem around the product: There is no built-in system for viewing history data, such as volume IOPS. We have to provide graphing by Prometheus and Grafana, which would be a good new feature in ScaleIO
  • The next good new feature would be moving volumes between different storage pools, e.g., from a SAS pool to a SSD pool. 
  • It would be nice to set minimum IOPS per volume, besides just the maximum, to be able to satisfy this demand from customers out-of-the-box, not by calculating number of disks, etc. 
  • It would be nice to have better integration with monitoring and other vendor provisioning and orchestration tools. I am aware that this is a hard to achieve task, where it is necessary for product not to be proprietary and to become industry standard.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Software Defined Storage (SDS)
May 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Red Hat, Nutanix and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: May 2022.
597,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Joe Huang - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Real User
They know how to present important data, including data flow and each drive's IOPS/bandwidth.
Pros and Cons
  • "They know how to clearly present any important data, including data flow and each drive's IOPS/bandwidth; and allow the user to easily monitor bottlenecks and problems"
  • "If they could introduce a write cache feature, the product would be perfect overall."

How has it helped my organization?

I just worry about capacity; performance is never a problem.

What is most valuable?

The ScaleIO UI: EMC has been working with storage for a long time. Therefore, they know how to clearly present any important data, including data flow and each drive's IOPS/bandwidth; and allow the user to easily monitor bottlenecks and problems, especially the rebuild and rebalance status of child objects. It controls them, as well as maintaining them well.

What needs improvement?

If they could introduce a write cache feature, the product would be perfect overall.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We have not encountered any stability issues. Meta Data Manager (MDM) is a lightweight process in version 2.0 . The design of MDM totally considers the chance for data loss because the MDM group can be extended to 10 roles to protect the meta data.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Actually, ScaleIO has a limitation of 1000 nodes. We only built up 20 nodes as SDS; that's enough for us.

How are customer service and technical support?

There are rich reviews, articles and people who are expert and full of passion to solve your problems in their forum.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used vSAN.

We switched because ScaleIO is a pioneer in all-flash; therefore, I applied that in our lab.

How was the initial setup?

First, you should know the concept of data flow in your product so that setup is not a big deal. Then, you should understand the structure of ScaleIO; that is useful for installation.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented by ourselves.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing this product, we did not evaluate other options.

What other advice do I have?

Maybe they could support more data types. That way, it would be like setting a gateway to convert any data you want (file or object).

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are an OEM partner.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Red Hat, Nutanix, and more!
Updated: May 2022
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report and find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Red Hat, Nutanix, and more!