IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

IBM CICS OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

IBM CICS is #1 ranked solution in top Transaction Processing tools. PeerSpot users give IBM CICS an average rating of 10 out of 10. IBM CICS is most commonly compared to Oracle Tuxedo: IBM CICS vs Oracle Tuxedo.
What is IBM CICS?

IBM CICS is a set of enterprise application servers with exceptional transactional performance and connectivity for mission-critical transactions. CICS applications are written in a wealth of languages, from Java to COBOL - all hosted in a highly scalable and secure environment.

IBM CICS was previously known as CICS.

IBM CICS Customers

Equens, EVRY, HSBC Bank Argentina, Garanti Bank, HDI-Gerling


IBM CICS Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
BearGFR - PeerSpot reviewer
zOS/Mainframe Operating Systems Software Consultant at zResource
Real User
A high-performing and reliable solution with mixed language support
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of this solution are speed, resiliency, evolution, and mixed language support."
  • "I'd like for the CPSM component to be more flexible in terms of maintenance deployment."

What is our primary use case?

It's only THE most successful software product of all time, on any platform. Worldwide, CICS processes approximately 1.6 million transactions per second, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.  You can bet that every banking, financial, investment, and insurance transaction that runs anywhere in the world is going to touch CICS at some point in its path.

How has it helped my organization?

There simply is no other platform that is capable of matching it in terms of processing capacity, flexibility, and reliability/availability.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of this solution are speed, resiliency, evolution, and mixed language support.

What needs improvement?

I'd like for the CPSM component to be more flexible in terms of maintenance deployment.  Some of the constraints it imposes on rolling out preventive service can complicate the process in a large systems complex (sysplex) consisting of many logical partitions (LPARs).

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for more than forty years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It runs on mainframes.  Nothing else need be said.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Considering that it runs on both the 'smallest' DOS/VSE system to the largest zOS Parallel Sysplex configurations in the world (I know of one customer who manages over 20,000 distinct CICS instances), I'd have to say that its scalability is unmatched on any platform.

How are customer service and support?

In my experience, the support structure and personnel beginning with level 1 all the way up to and including the architectural and development team at IBM are the best and most capable of any that exist on the planet.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Considering that in 1969 when CICS was first deployed, there *was* no other solution, no.

How was the initial setup?

Standard SMP/e installation process.

What about the implementation team?

In house

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

See above

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.