We performed a comparison between enable.sc and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.sc has a user-friendly interface and fewer false positives, while Trend Micro Cloud One has good workload management and technical control. Tenable.sc excels in accurate detection, prioritization, and automation, while Trend Micro Cloud One provides excellent virtual patching, login inspection, and container security. Tenable.sc needs to improve its penetration testing, pricing, GUI, reporting, vendor training, and accuracy of vulnerability assessments. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One needs to enhance its pricing, automation, robustness, licensing, marketing documentation, local agent logs, alerts, and flexibility.
Service and Support: Tenable.sc's customer service has received mixed feedback, with users reporting delays and unhelpful information. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has received largely positive reviews for their customer service, with customers praising the responsiveness and knowledge of the support team.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.sc has a simple and uncomplicated initial setup process, which can be completed quickly in just one day. In contrast, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup is more complex and can take anywhere from several hours to a month, depending on the technical expertise and environmental complexity involved. Furthermore, Cloud One necessitates daily monitoring for vulnerabilities and problems.
Pricing: Tenable.sc charges based on the number of IP addresses and has additional costs for advanced support, while some find it reasonable and others consider it expensive. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the middle range and they offer additional services for a better infrastructure picture. The price has decreased by 25% in recent years.
ROI: Tenable.sc offers cost savings by reducing the need for additional manpower, ensuring a positive return on investment. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One is known for its versatility and seamless integration capabilities.
Comparison Results: Tenable.sc is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One for vulnerability scanning and reporting, according to user reviews. Tenable.sc offers more sophisticated scanning capabilities, timely updates, and fewer false positives than its competitors. While Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its virtual patching and login inspection features, users have reported high pricing, complex initial setup, and inadequate marketing documentation.
"The security baseline and vulnerability assessments is the valuable feature."
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"The product supports out-of-the-box reporting with context about the asset and allows us to perform complex custom queries on UI."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"Tenable also helps us to focus resources on the vulnerabilities that are most likely to be exploited. And since it is continuously updated, it allows us to reevaluate quickly if there are new vulnerabilities found..."
"It's a very useful tool."
"The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."
"Tenable.sc is user-friendly."
"One of the most valuable features is their distributed scan model for allotting engines to work together as a pool and handle multiple scans at once, across multiple environments. Automatic scanning distribution is a distinguishing feature of their toolset."
"The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"The solution's container security could be improved."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"We wish there were a way, beyond providing visibility and automated remediation, to wait on a given remediation, due to a critical aspect, such as the cost associated with a particular upgrade... We would like to see preventive controls that can be applied through Wiz to protect against vulnerabilities that we're not going to be able to remediate immediately."
"Support could be faster."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
"The reporting needs a lot of work on the template."
"For downloading reports, we have to go to the scan and then we have to go to the reports and download the Excel or CSV or PDF. I think these menus and clicks can be minimized."
"The integration is very good, although it still needs to improve."
"The reporting side can be improved. The dashboards are nice, but exporting things out for reports for management was a little tough."
"The tool's initial configuration is not so easy."
"The solution needs to improve its support. I would like to see a bird's eye view of my network architecture. I would also like to see the continuous view feature in the tool."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tenable Security Center is ranked 10th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 48 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 5th in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) with 17 reviews. Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Forescout Platform, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Trellix Cloud Workload Security . See our Tenable Security Center vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
