SonicWall Capture Client and ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform are competitive solutions in the endpoint security category. While SonicWall offers budget-friendly pricing and support advantages, ThreatLocker holds the upper hand in terms of a robust feature set and perceived value, positioning it as a compelling choice for comprehensive endpoint protection.
Features: SonicWall Capture Client delivers remarkable performance with features like Capture ATP and web content filtering. It provides threat detection and integrated firewall capabilities that synchronize smoothly with other SonicWall network security solutions. Additionally, SonicWall Capture Client includes a multi-engine sandboxing solution known as Capture ATP, which is effective for both EDR and EPP tasks. ThreatLocker's standout features include its granular application control and zero trust architecture, which efficiently blocks unauthorized applications and isolates compromised systems. Allowlisting is key for ThreatLocker, offering comprehensive whitelisting that integrates well with zero trust principles and enhancing endpoint security.
Room for Improvement: SonicWall Capture Client could benefit from enhanced features to further extend its capabilities in providing endpoint security beyond its current firewall integrations. Improvements in threat intelligence specifics could also be beneficial. Additionally, aligning its deployment with more straightforward user controls might improve usability. ThreatLocker might enhance its offering by refining its zero trust architecture for even more granular control and reducing dependency on user interventions. Simplifying its management interface could further ease its integration into varied IT environments. Lastly, expanding native integrations with other platforms might increase its functionality.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall Capture Client is noted for its straightforward deployment process and extensive technical support, providing a smoother onboarding experience. It offers a reliable management console that enhances usability. ThreatLocker also presents an efficient deployment model, but its strength lies in customizable support services that meet specific enterprise needs. It stands out for its adaptable support, providing training until clients feel comfortable handling requests independently.
Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Client's pricing strategy is considered budget-friendly, appealing to cost-conscious buyers with a low setup cost. In contrast, ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform may have a higher upfront investment but offers extensive protection features and long-term security benefits. This investment often results in higher ROI for security-sensitive environments. Although SonicWall is initially more cost-effective, ThreatLocker delivers superior value by providing enhanced security returns.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
Partners can purchase single endpoints at prices equivalent to 1,000-endpoint deals, providing an advantage for managed security service provider partners.
While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
There are no restrictions on the scalability of SonicWall Capture Client.
SonicWall Capture Client is accessed via cloud-based management console.
The installation process is straightforward, requiring only five pilot installations to enable customers to complete the remaining installations independently.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
One of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier licenses within a single tenant, which can be problematic when users need to deploy different licenses.
XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall.
A significant limitation is that SonicWall Capture Client cannot be installed on smartphones, as there is no mobile version available.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
Machine learning is particularly effective due to SonicWall sandboxing's threat intelligence database of approximately 7.1 billion entries.
One is that users can use the sandbox of SonicWall, which is called Capture ATP for free.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 0.9% |
SonicWall Capture Client | 0.6% |
Other | 98.5% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 10 |
Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 32 |
Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Large Enterprise | 3 |
SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust endpoint security through application control and allowlisting, safeguarding servers and workstations from unauthorized software execution.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.
What are the top features of ThreatLocker?ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform is widely implemented to safeguard IT infrastructures against unauthorized access and application use. In sectors where data security is paramount, this platform enables users to prevent unauthorized software installations and control device applications, ensuring real-time threat prevention and compliance with industry regulations.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.