SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Synopsys API Security Testing comparison

Sonar and Black Duck are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Black Duck is ranked #38. Sonar holds a 22.7% mindshare in SAST, compared to Black Duck’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Sonar users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 116 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

33,394 Views
11,287 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Synopsys API Security Testing

Read 1 Synopsys API Security Testing review

224 Views
83 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Synopsys API Security Testing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

SonarQube Server and Synopsys API Security Testing are competing products in software quality and security management. Synopsys API Security Testing leads with its comprehensive API security testing capabilities, while SonarQube is preferred for its pricing and support.

Features: SonarQube Server focuses on code quality analysis, offering detailed reports and integration with development workflows. It provides code vulnerability detection, supports multiple programming languages, and has active directory integration. Synopsys API Security Testing focuses on API security, equipped to uncover vulnerabilities across API endpoints. It features automated API security scans, dynamic application security testing (DAST) capabilities, and integration with popular CI/CD tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server is known for its straightforward deployment and effective customer support, ensuring easy integration into systems. Synopsys API Security Testing, despite offering extensive support, can be complex to deploy due to advanced configuration requirements. SonarQube's setup is user-friendly, while Synopsys caters to complex organizational needs.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube Server is cost-effective with a notable ROI, appealing to teams focused on code quality. Synopsys API Security Testing has a higher upfront cost but provides substantial ROI with its advanced security features. SonarQube is affordable compared to Synopsys's investment in cutting-edge API security.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

116

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Synopsys API Security Testing

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

38th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 22.7%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Synopsys API Security Testing is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Sthembiso Zondi

Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com

Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support

The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.

Read full review

UmarQureshi

Security Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Useful threat vectors, beneficial results, but implementation needed support

We are using Synopsys API Security Testing for scanning APIs for risks and vulnerabilities and to understand our posture before deployment within our business The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares. I have been…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We advise all of our developers to have this solution in place."

"The solution can verify vulnerabilities, code smells, and hotspots. It makes the software more secure and it helps make a junior or novice developer sharper."

"The overall quality of the indicator is good."

"This has improved our organization because it has helped to find Security Vulnerabilities."

"There's plenty of documentation available to users."

"Apart from the security point of view, I like that it makes it easy to detect code smells and other issues in terms of code quality and standards."

"SonarQube is designed well making it easy to use, simple to identify issues and find solutions to problems."

"Can tweak rules and feed them into our build pipelines."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

"The most valuable features of Synopsys API Security Testing are the metrics, results, and threat vectors that it shares."

Cons

"The product needs to integrate other security tools for security scanning."

"If you don't have any experience with the configuration or how to configure the files, it can be complicated."

"The BPM language is important and should be considered in SonarQube."

"In the next release, I would like to have notifications because now, it is a bit difficult. I think that's a feature which we could add there and it would benefit the users as well. For every full request, they should be able to see their bugs or vulnerability directly on the surface."

"If there was an official Docker image of SonarQube that could easily integrate into the pipeline would help the user to plug in and plug out and use it directly without any custom configuration. I am not sure if this is being offered already in an update but it would be very helpful."

"I find it is light on the security side."

"The solution could improve the management reports by making them easier to understand for the technical team that needs to review them."

"An improvement is with false positives. Sometimes the tool can say there is an issue in your code but, really, you have to do things in a certain way due to external dependencies, and I think it's very hard to indicate this is the case."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

"The solution required us to use our team and we spoke to Synopsys API Security Testing's support to do the implementation. We use two people from our team for the implementation. and one person for maintenance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a user and a consumer of this solution, it can be pricey for my company to support and use, even though there are many benefits. For this reason, we use the free version. In the future, as our product cycles develop and evolve at a more steady pace, we hope to invest in the licensing for this tool."

"This product is open source and very convenient."

"I am satisfied with the pricing."

"SonarQube price is a little bit higher than Kiuwan's. Kiuwan also gives a little bit of flexibility in terms of pricing."

"The free version of SonarQube does everything that we need it to."

"I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this."

"SonarQube is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Insurance Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 13% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 13% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 6% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Invicti vs Synopsys API Security Testing

Compared 100% of the time

More Synopsys API Security Testing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

June 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

June 2025

Download Synopsys API Security Testing product report

Also Known As

Sonar

No data available

Interactive Demo

Sonar

Demo not available

Black Duck

Overview

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

AppSec testing optimized for the needs of API developers
APIs provide open, flexible interfaces that enable applications and services to talk to each other. But these characteristics can also make it difficult to build secure software—and even more difficult for traditional AppSec tools to test it.

Black Duck

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.