Tenable Security Center and Snyk compete in the vulnerability management category. Based on the data comparison, Snyk seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and integration capabilities, especially for development teams.
Features: Tenable Security Center provides comprehensive vulnerability scanning with powerful dashboards, flexible policy creation, and prioritization features. It is designed for large organizations with customizable scanning options. Snyk is developer-friendly with seamless integrations and a comprehensive vulnerability database. It quickly identifies and fixes vulnerabilities, integrating with tools like Slack and GitHub.
Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could improve its query flexibility and report configuration, with better integrations and automated reporting. Snyk could enhance its language support, refine notifications, and offer improved IDE integration. Including scanning types like SAST or DAST would make Snyk more robust for security management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center is mainly deployed on-premises, affecting scalability compared to Snyk’s flexible cloud deployment options. Tenable's support receives mixed reviews with slow response times, while Snyk's support is praised for responsiveness and efficiency, with extensive documentation aiding developers.
Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is generally more expensive, suitable for large enterprises justifying the cost with its extensive features. It offers good ROI by reducing security risks. Snyk is considered more affordable for enterprises with a pricing model tailored for developer-centric environments. Its competitive pricing provides value, enabling cost-effective scalability and proactive security management.
Through the use of Tenable Security Center, my clients achieve more efficient patching and gain visibility and understanding of security operations, leading to improved resilience and infrastructure insight.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
Longer response times and less thorough assistance.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
I can scale it extensively with the use of agents, allowing scanning in restrictive environments and loosely connected devices.
Scalability is a bit limited with Tenable Security Center.
The stability of the solution is outstanding.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys.
The reports and plugins for reports and scans could benefit from enhancements.
Translating reports into European languages is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pricing.
The product is somewhat pricey, reflecting its valuable features and status as a high-quality solution in the vulnerability management market.
The cost of Tenable Security Center is reasonable for our company.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
The most valuable features of Tenable Security Center for my clients are Vulnerability Priority Rating (VPR) and Asset Criticality Scoring.
The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping.
Tenable Security Center provides an overall score of vulnerabilities, comparing an organization with others in the same industry.
Snyk's AI Trust Platform empowers developers to innovate securely in AI-driven environments, ensuring rapid and secure software development with enhanced policy governance.
Snyk’s platform integrates AI-ready engines across the software development lifecycle, offering broad coverage with high speed and accuracy essential for fast-paced coding environments. AI-driven features include visibility, prioritization, and tailored security policies that enable proactive threat prevention and quick remediation. By focusing on LLM engineering and AI code analysis, Snyk supports secure and productive development processes. The platform's partnerships, including GenAI code assistants, enhance AI application security by addressing new threats and code velocity challenges.
What are the key features of Snyk?Snyk is implemented across industries focusing on agile development and DevSecOps, enhancing software delivery speed and security. It is widely used for continuous monitoring and adherence to security and licensing standards, especially in environments relying on Docker image security and CI/CD pipeline integration.
Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.
Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.
We monitor all Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
