• Home
  • Seeker vs. WhiteHat Dynamic

Seeker vs WhiteHat Dynamic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Synopsys Logo

Seeker

Read 1 Seeker review
758 views|558 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Synopsys Logo

WhiteHat Dynamic

Read 2 WhiteHat Dynamic reviews
113 views|85 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Seeker and WhiteHat Dynamic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
San K
More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities
Anonymous User
The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples.
Using the Sentinel product allows our company to quickly identify any potential product vulnerabilities before they can be exploited with the... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year."

    • More Seeker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Seeker?
    Top Answer:A significant advantage of Seeker is that it is an interactive scanner, and we have found it to be much more effective in reducing the amount of false positives than dynamic scanners such as AppScan… more »
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seeker?
    Top Answer:The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year.
    What needs improvement with Seeker?
    Top Answer:One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    24th
    out of 67 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    758
    Comparisons
    558
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,632
    Rating
    7.0
    5th
    out of 12 in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
    Views
    113
    Comparisons
    85
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Sentinel Dynamic, WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing, Synopsys WhiteHat Dynamic
    Learn More
    Synopsys
    Synopsys
    Overview
    Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your modern web, cloud based and microservices based app security posture. It automatically verifies, prioritizes and reports on critical vulnerabilities in real time. It identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption. Seeker’s seamless integration into CI/CD workflows enables fast interactive application security testing at DevOps speed.

    WhiteHat Dynamic™ enables organizations to test applications at DevSecOps speed and enterprise-scale to build trust into their entire software portfolio. WhiteHat Dynamic combines artificial intelligence with expert security analysis, producing verified, actionable findings with near-zero false positives and yielding the most accurate results enabling organizations the need to understand, prioritize, and mitigate or remediate vulnerabilities in the shortest timeframe.

    Sample Customers
    El Al Airlines and Société Française du Radiotelephone
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Seeker is ranked 24th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review while WhiteHat Dynamic is ranked 5th in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Seeker is rated 7.0, while WhiteHat Dynamic is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Seeker writes "More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhiteHat Dynamic writes "The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples". Seeker is most compared with Synopsys API Security Testing, Coverity, Contrast Security Assess, Polaris Software Integrity Platform and SonarQube, whereas WhiteHat Dynamic is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.